切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 346 -349. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.05.007

论著

IPST-3D补片应用于造口旁疝治疗的效果分析:附视频
曹金鑫1, 朱熠林1,(), 刘雨辰1, 邹振玉1   
  1. 1. 100043 北京,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-19 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 朱熠林

IPST-3D mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernia repair: A retrospective analysis (video attached)

Jinxin Cao1, Yilin Zhu1,(), Yuchen Liu1, Zhenyu Zou1   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2022-07-19 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yilin Zhu
引用本文:

曹金鑫, 朱熠林, 刘雨辰, 邹振玉. IPST-3D补片应用于造口旁疝治疗的效果分析:附视频[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 346-349.

Jinxin Cao, Yilin Zhu, Yuchen Liu, Zhenyu Zou. IPST-3D mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernia repair: A retrospective analysis (video attached)[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 346-349.

目的

评估IPST-3D补片治疗造口旁疝的临床效果。

方法

采用病例检索筛查和随访方式,选择2015年1月至2021年5月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院符合纳入标准并获得完整随访资料的造口旁疝患者546例,获得患者知情同意后,收集患者住院期间资料并随访出院后情况,评估IPST-3D补片在造口旁疝手术中的应用效果。

结果

546例患者中男271例,年龄(67.06±9.15)岁,平均造口旁疝病程(3.83±1.55)年;73例(13.37%)行全腹腔镜手术,473例(86.63%)行复合手术;造口分型(Rubin分型)Ⅱ型149例(27.29%),Ⅱ+Ⅲ型397例(72.71%);平均疝环直径(4.18±1.03)cm,平均手术时间为(82.40±11.18)min,术中出血量为(26.72±10.35)ml,住院时间为(19.31±10.37)d;术后随访时间13~69(47.05±21.56)个月;术后复发66例(12.09%),发生术后肠梗阻35例(6.41%),造口坏死23例(4.21%),补片感染10例(1.83%),肠管损伤(含肠瘘)6例(1.10%),切口感染(含造口感染)4例(0.73%),积液2例(0.37%),出血、慢性疼痛各1例(0.18%)。

结论

采用IPST-3D补片治疗造口旁疝效果确切,建议由具有丰富经验的疝中心专科医师进行手术。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of IPST-3D mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernia repair.

Methods

From January 2015 to May 2021, a total of 546 cases undergoing parastomal hernia repair surgery with IPST-3D mesh in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital of Capital Medical University were selected as the subjects. The clinical information and postoperative follow-up data of patients were collected to evaluate the effect of IPST-3D mesh for parastomal hernia surgery.

Results

There were 271 male in the 546 cases, with an average age of (67.06±9.15), and the average course of hernia was (3.83±1.55) years. Seventy-three cases (13.37%) underwent total laparoscopic repair surgery and 473 cases (86.63%) underwent hybrid operation. The classification of hernia (Rubin): 149 cases of type Ⅱ(27.29%), 397 cases of type Ⅱ+Ⅲ(72.71%), and the average hernia ring diameter was (4.18±1.03) cm. The average operation time was (82.40±11.18) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (26.72±10.35) ml, and the hospital stay was (19.31±10.37) d. The mean duration of follow-up was (47.05±21.56) months (range of 13-69 months). Sixty-six cases (12.09%) recurred after operation. The postoperative complications were as follows: intestinal obstruction in 35 cases (6.41%), colostomy necrosis in 23 cases (4.21%), mesh infection in 10 cases (1.83%), intestinal injury (including intestinal fistula) in 6 cases (1.10%), incisional infection (including ostomy) in 4 cases (0.73%), effusion in 2 cases (0.37%), bleeding in 1 case (0.18%), and chronic pain in 1 case (0.18%).

Conclusions

The application of IPST-3D mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernia repair has satisfactory result. It is recommended that experienced hernia center specialists perform the operation.

图1 全腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术 腹腔镜下关闭疝环(A);补片剪开后置入腹腔(B);固定补片(钉枪+缝合)(C);固定补片后缝合(D)
图2 造口旁疝修补复合手术 切开造口(A);切除造口远端肠管(B);置入补片(C);关闭疝环(D);固定补片(E)
[1]
张小桥. 造口旁疝的预防[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 8(4): 263-266.
[2]
姚琪远,何凯. 造口旁疝手术治疗术式选择及技术要点[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2012, 32(6): 443-445.
[3]
Odensten C, Strigård K, Dahlberg M, et al. Parastomal hernia repair; seldom performed and seldom reported: results from a nationwide survey[J]. Scand J Surg, 2020, 109(2): 96-101.
[4]
Berger D. Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST)[J]. Hernia, 2008, 12(3): 243-246.
[5]
张剑. 造口旁疝的发生机制和预防注意事项[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 1-3.
[6]
刘乃青,孙淑香,周忠晋, 等. 腹膜外造口和盆底腹膜重建预防腹腔镜下Miles术后造口旁疝和盆底粘连梗阻[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2014, 29(10): 804-805.
[7]
许彬彬,周林秋,段建春, 等. 预防性补片置入在预防造口旁疝中应用价值的Meta分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(4): 386-398.
[8]
路夷平,叶晋生,于淼, 等. 腹腔镜造口旁疝造口重建下Keyhole修补与非重建下Keyhole修补的临床对照研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2017, 32(12): 992-996.
[9]
王莉莉,杨福全,郭自成, 等. 腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补术Sugarbaker术与Keyhole术的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 370-374.
[10]
Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E, Vironen J, Falenius V, et al. Parastomal hernia: A retrospective nationwide cohort study comparing different techniques with long-term follow-up[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(6): 1742-1749.
[11]
王帆,靳翠红,申英末, 等. DynaMesh-IPST造口专用补片在腹壁造瘘口旁疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1101-1105.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[7] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[11] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[12] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要