切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 59 -62. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.01.012

论著

不同内侧界右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫前瞻性对比研究
孙然1,(), 陈明1, 陈云1   
  1. 1. 247000 安徽省池州市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-25 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 通信作者: 孙然

D3 lymphadenectomy in right colon cancer with different medial boundaries: A prospective comparative study

Ran Sun1,(), Ming Chen1, Yun Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the People’s Hospital of Chizhou, Chizhou 247000, China
  • Received:2022-08-25 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ran Sun
引用本文:

孙然, 陈明, 陈云. 不同内侧界右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫前瞻性对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 59-62.

Ran Sun, Ming Chen, Yun Chen. D3 lymphadenectomy in right colon cancer with different medial boundaries: A prospective comparative study[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 59-62.

目的

对比分析不同内侧界右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫的临床效果。

方法

选取2018年1月至2020年12月于池州市人民医院行腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫的56例右半结肠癌患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为两组,各28例,分别以肠系膜上动脉左侧(SMA组)和肠系膜上静脉左侧(SMV组)为内侧界进行腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫。比较两组围手术期相关指标、术后并发症及术后生存情况。

结果

SMA组淋巴结清扫总数和阳性淋巴结数目较SMV组显著增多(P<0.05),两组手术时间、术中出血量及术后引流量、排气时间、住院时间、术后总并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义。术后随访35(18~54)个月,SMA组累积无病生存率(82.1% vs 71.4%)及累积总生存率(89.3% vs 78.6%)略高于SMV组,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.995、1.402,P=0.319、0.236)。

结论

以SMV左侧与SMA左侧为内侧界的腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫均是安全可行的,在保证肿瘤根治性切除的基础上,以SMA左侧为内侧界清扫淋巴结更彻底,提高了肿瘤根治程度且未显著增加手术风险,有利于改善患者预后。

Objective

To compare and analyze the clinical effects of D3 lymphadenectomy in right colon cancer with different medial boundaries.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2020, 56 patients with right colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy in the People’s Hospital of Chizhou were selected as the research objects. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 28 patients in each group. The left side of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA group) or the left side of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV group) were used as the medial boundary for laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy of right colon cancer. The perioperative related indexes, postoperative complications and postoperative survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

The total number of lymphadenectomy and positive lymph nodes in SMA group were significantly higher than those in SMV group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, exhaust time, hospital stay, and total incidence of postoperative complications. The cumulative disease-free survival rate (82.1% vs 71.4%) and cumulative overall survival rate (89.3% vs 78.6%) in SMA group were slightly higher than those in SMV group, but the differences were not statistically significant (χ2=0.995, 1.402; P=0.319, 0.236).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer with the left side of SMV or the left side of SMA as the medial boundary is safe and feasible. On the basis of ensuring the radical treatment of the tumor, the left side of SMA as the medial boundary can be used to remove the lymph node more thoroughly, improve the degree of radical treatment of the tumor without significantly increasing the risk of surgery, and is conducive to improving the prognosis of patients.

表1 两组右半结肠癌患者一般资料比较
表2 两组右半结肠癌患者围手术期相关指标比较(±s)
图1 两组右半结肠癌患者生存曲线分析 A为累积总生存率;B为累积无病生存率
[1]
Matsuda T, Yamashita K, Hasegawa H, et al. Current status and trend of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(5): 521-527.
[2]
Bai J, Liu X, Cai M, et al. Technical standardization of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy-A video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018, 20(3): 264.
[3]
秦伟, 马君俊, 冯波. 右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫的内侧界[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(4): 4.
[4]
Zhou L, Diao D, Ye K, et al. The medial border of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer: results from an exploratory pilot study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2021, 64(10): 1286-1296.
[5]
吴春晓, 付晨, 赫捷, 等. 2015年中国结直肠癌发病和死亡情况分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(4): 241-245.
[6]
Mukund K, Syulyukina N, Ramamoorthy S, et al. Right and left-sided colon cancers-specificity of molecular mechanisms in tumorigenesis and progression[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 317.
[7]
申占龙, 叶颖江. 中国腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术20年术式演变与发展[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 4.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(8): 561-585.
[9]
王颢, 赵权权. 腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术关键血管评估及处理[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(3): 267-271.
[10]
Garcia-Granero A, Pellino G, Giner F, et al. A proposal for novel standards of histopathology reporting for D3 lymphadenectomy in right colon cancer: the mesocolic sail and superior right colic vein landmarks[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2020, 63(4): 450-460.
[11]
于亮, 段绍斌, 刘郁, 等. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术血管解剖技巧:附45例报告[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(8): 750-752.
[12]
Yi X, Li H, Lu X, et al. "Caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the superior mesenteric artery for the treatment of right colon cancer: is it more in line with the principle of oncology?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(9): 4089-4100.
[13]
周乐其, 李健文, 陆爱国, 等. 以肠系膜上动脉左侧为右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫内侧界可行性研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2019, 39(7): 4.
[14]
孙跃明, 封益飞, 唐俊伟, 等. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的争议和手术技巧[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(5): 426-429.
[15]
黄泉龙, 金英虎, 王贵玉. 结肠癌CME与D3根治术:平面与血管之争[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 8(6): 4.
[16]
Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, et al. Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short-and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(6): 2721-2731.
[17]
谢斌耀, 李世红, 任旭. 腹腔镜技术用于右半结肠癌手术的安全性及入路分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 3.
[1] 沈佩儿, 张晓娅, 邱宸阳, 鲍立华. 血管腔内治疗自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 47-50.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[4] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[5] 孔宪诚, 黄建平, 阎良, 汤雪峰. 腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫结合CME与常规根治术治疗右半结肠癌的随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 510-513.
[6] 王平, 张汝一. 不同淋巴结清扫内侧界限对右半结肠癌腹腔镜根治术近中期随访评价影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 506-509.
[7] 吴岑, 俞卫卫. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中以SMA与SMV为淋巴结清扫内界的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 214-217.
[8] 张子超, 杨国山, 石文征, 侯丁丁, 刘宇萌, 赵力. 尾侧入路腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 492-492.
[9] 刘见, 张恩霖, 杨晓波, 吴淼. 从上到下"翻页式"3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术扶镜体会[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 303-306.
[10] 庄競. 左半结肠血管解剖学的再认识及其临床意义[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 459-464.
[11] 闫顺笠, 孙慧敏, 郑朝旭, 刘正, 陈海鹏, 关旭, 周思成, 周海涛, 梁建伟, 裴炜, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口经直肠切口取标本的腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术(CRC-NOSES-Ⅷ式B法)近期疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 212-219.
[12] 宁英泽, 刘军广, 蔡云龙, 饶小龙, 戎龙, 汤坚强. 改良内镜辅助经横结肠腔道取标本的腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治NOSES术(改良CRC-NOSES-Ⅷ式C法)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 547-549.
[13] 陈佳楠, 陈海鹏, 王玲玲, 刘正, 刘骞. 首荟通便胶囊在右半结肠切除手术肠道准备中的作用研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 476-481.
[14] 闫顺笠, 孙慧敏, 郑朝旭, 刘正, 陈海鹏, 关旭, 庄孟, 黄海洋, 王锡山, 裴炜. 全腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后肠梗阻一例并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 427-431.
[15] 公丕庆, 胡志前, 姚厚山. 尾侧外侧入路行腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的安全性及可行性临床分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 318-323.
阅读次数
全文


摘要