切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 110 -114. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.02.005

论著

胆道镜下放置胆道支架在胆总管结石并急性胆管炎中的应用
陈浩1, 林梁1, 马克强1, 黄健斌1, 邱旭彬1, 曹天生1,()   
  1. 1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院 南方医科大学附属花都医院肝胆胰疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-08 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 曹天生
  • 基金资助:
    广州市花都区人民医院院内重点学科(2022—2025年)项目(YNZDXK202201)

Application of biliary stent placement under choledochoscope for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis

Hao Chen1, Liang Lin1, Keqiang Ma1, Jianbin Huang1, Xubin Qiu1, Tiansheng Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Hernia Surgery, Huadu District People’s Hospital of Guangzhou, Huadu Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510800, China
  • Received:2022-11-08 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Tiansheng Cao
引用本文:

陈浩, 林梁, 马克强, 黄健斌, 邱旭彬, 曹天生. 胆道镜下放置胆道支架在胆总管结石并急性胆管炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 110-114.

Hao Chen, Liang Lin, Keqiang Ma, Jianbin Huang, Xubin Qiu, Tiansheng Cao. Application of biliary stent placement under choledochoscope for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 110-114.

目的

对比胆囊结石合并胆总管结石、急性胆管炎患者行腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架与行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的差异。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2022年7月收治的66例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石、急性胆管炎患者资料,其中33例行LCBDE一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架(LCBDE组),33例行ERCP+LC术(ERCP组)。

结果

两组患者术后3 d内炎性指标下降趋势差异无统计学意义。LCBDE组患者术后胰腺炎发生率低于ERCP组(P=0.009),住院总费用更低(t=38.970,P=0.008)。随访6个月,LCBDE组术后出现胆漏、胆道感染、切口感染各1例,两组总并发症发生率均为9.09%(3/33),差异无统计学意义(P=0.500)。

结论

对于胆总管结石合并急性胆管炎患者,行LCBDE一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架是安全有效的。

Objective

To compare the difference between modified biliary stent placement in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and primary suture and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis.

Methods

From June 2021 to July 2022, the clinical data of 66 patients with gallstone, choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 cases were treated with LCBDE and primary suture with modified biliary stent (LCBDE group), and 33 cases with ERCP+LC (ERCP group).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the change trend of postoperative inflammatory indexes within 3 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative pancreatitis in LCBDE group was lower than that in ERCP group (P=0.009), and the total cost of hospitalization was lower (t=38.970, P=0.008). Following up for 6 months, there was 1 case of bile leakage, 1 case of biliary tract infection and 1 case of incision infection in the LCBDE group, with no statistically significant difference in the total complication rate with ERCP group (9.09% vs 9.09%, P=0.500).

Conclusion

The application of modified biliary stent placement in LCBDE and primary suture is safe and effective for patients with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis.

图1 手术过程 术中可见炎性水肿的胆囊(A);胆总管扩张,直径大于8 mm(B);切开胆总管取石后,导丝探查可通过胆总管开口(C);胆道镜下置入胆道支架(D);支架侧翼完全进入胆道(E);胆总管一期缝合(F)
表1 两组胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者围手术期一般临床资料比较
组别 LCBDE组 ERCP组 统计值 P
例数 33 33    
性别     0.243 0.622
16(48.48) 18(54.55) 0.154 0.132
17(51.52) 15(45.45) 0.176 0.098
年龄(岁)a 53.27±8.06 49.30±7.05 0.235 1.021
白细胞计数(×109/L)a        
术前 7.82±1.05 10.77±1.34 0.012 0.986
术后3 d 7.83±1.03 9.83±1.21 0.321 0.635
C反应蛋白(mg/L)a        
术前 15.22±1.89 17.17±2.01 0.123 0.874
术后3 d 33.72±3.12 33.39±5.31 0.456 0.352
降钙素原(μg/L)a        
术前 2.34±0.15 0.12±0.01 0.056 0.098
术后3 d 1.02±0.02 1.20±0.03 0.253 1.650
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L)a        
术前 284.70±50.12 35.91±5.20 1.324 0.051
术后3 d 93.75±10.23 108.94±11.23 0.698 0.210
γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(U/L)a        
术前 422.97±89.03 320.54±56.21 2.698 0.064
术后3 d 222.85±12.31 181.70.81±13.12 0.985 0.098
总胆红素(μmol/L)a        
术前 86.7±3.42 47.84±5.15 1.874 0.078
术后3 d 31.01±5.31 30.12±5.23 0.321 1.256
淀粉酶(U/L)a        
术前 144.38±8.56 564.03±101.10 3.685 0.053
术后3 d 87.91±15.63 94.11±18.53 1.365 0.035
合并疾病        
高血压 8(24.24) 7(21.21) 0.986 0.875
心脑血管病 5(15.15) 2(6.06) 0.236 0.062
糖尿病 0(0) 1(3.03) 0.025 0.058
ASA分级        
10(30.30) 11(33.33) 0.984 0.867
14(42.42) 21(63.64) 0.754 0.587
9(27.27) 0(0) 1.265 0.012b
0(0) 1(3.03) 0.635 0.514
结石直径(cm) 1.40±0.12 0.66±0.03 0.521 0.060
结石数量(个) 1.96±0.65 1.30±0.08 0.765 0.124
结石嵌顿 3(9.09) 1(3.03) 0.241 0.071
[1]
Liu B, Wu DS, Cao PK, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic extraction and balloon dilation for simultaneous gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: A novel technique[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(33): 3799-3805.
[2]
Palermo M, Fendrich I, Ronchi A, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using a single-operator cholangioscope[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(9): 989-992.
[3]
Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(9): 3763-3776.
[4]
李超, 汪宏, 刘玉海, 等. 双镜联合胆总管探查术胆管自脱落支架置入与T管引流的临床疗效比较[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 112-115.
[5]
Xu Y, Dong C, Ma K, et al. Spontaneously removed biliary stent drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(39): e5011.
[6]
Padmore G, Sutherland FR, Ball CG. The art and craft of biliary T-tube use[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021, 91(2): e46-e49.
[7]
徐垚, 安东均, 冯金鸽, 等. 胆总管探查一期缝合鼻胆管引流与T管引流治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(4): 288-292.
[8]
Liu D, Cao F, Liu J, et al. Risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 1.
[9]
Yin Y, He K, Xia X. Comparison of primary suture and t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative choledochoscopy in the treatment of secondary common bile duct stones: A single-center retrospective analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(6): 612-619.
[10]
王国泰, 杨兴武, 王旗, 等. 一期与分期微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019, 34(12): 1056-1059.
[11]
王海龙, 索灵宇, 韩唯杰, 等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆管可控式自脱支架治疗胆总管结石合并胆管炎的临床观察[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(5): 374-378.
[12]
赵培忠. 腹胆双镜下胆囊切除联合胆总管探查取石一期缝合术治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的疗效观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2018, 42(4): 431-432.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要