切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 110 -114. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.02.005

论著

胆道镜下放置胆道支架在胆总管结石并急性胆管炎中的应用
陈浩1, 林梁1, 马克强1, 黄健斌1, 邱旭彬1, 曹天生1,()   
  1. 1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院 南方医科大学附属花都医院肝胆胰疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-08 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 曹天生
  • 基金资助:
    广州市花都区人民医院院内重点学科(2022—2025年)项目(YNZDXK202201)

Application of biliary stent placement under choledochoscope for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis

Hao Chen1, Liang Lin1, Keqiang Ma1, Jianbin Huang1, Xubin Qiu1, Tiansheng Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Hernia Surgery, Huadu District People’s Hospital of Guangzhou, Huadu Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510800, China
  • Received:2022-11-08 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Tiansheng Cao
引用本文:

陈浩, 林梁, 马克强, 黄健斌, 邱旭彬, 曹天生. 胆道镜下放置胆道支架在胆总管结石并急性胆管炎中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 110-114.

Hao Chen, Liang Lin, Keqiang Ma, Jianbin Huang, Xubin Qiu, Tiansheng Cao. Application of biliary stent placement under choledochoscope for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 110-114.

目的

对比胆囊结石合并胆总管结石、急性胆管炎患者行腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架与行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的差异。

方法

回顾性分析2021年6月至2022年7月收治的66例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石、急性胆管炎患者资料,其中33例行LCBDE一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架(LCBDE组),33例行ERCP+LC术(ERCP组)。

结果

两组患者术后3 d内炎性指标下降趋势差异无统计学意义。LCBDE组患者术后胰腺炎发生率低于ERCP组(P=0.009),住院总费用更低(t=38.970,P=0.008)。随访6个月,LCBDE组术后出现胆漏、胆道感染、切口感染各1例,两组总并发症发生率均为9.09%(3/33),差异无统计学意义(P=0.500)。

结论

对于胆总管结石合并急性胆管炎患者,行LCBDE一期缝合术中应用改良胆道支架是安全有效的。

Objective

To compare the difference between modified biliary stent placement in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and primary suture and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallstone with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis.

Methods

From June 2021 to July 2022, the clinical data of 66 patients with gallstone, choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 cases were treated with LCBDE and primary suture with modified biliary stent (LCBDE group), and 33 cases with ERCP+LC (ERCP group).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the change trend of postoperative inflammatory indexes within 3 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative pancreatitis in LCBDE group was lower than that in ERCP group (P=0.009), and the total cost of hospitalization was lower (t=38.970, P=0.008). Following up for 6 months, there was 1 case of bile leakage, 1 case of biliary tract infection and 1 case of incision infection in the LCBDE group, with no statistically significant difference in the total complication rate with ERCP group (9.09% vs 9.09%, P=0.500).

Conclusion

The application of modified biliary stent placement in LCBDE and primary suture is safe and effective for patients with choledocholithiasis and acute cholangitis.

图1 手术过程 术中可见炎性水肿的胆囊(A);胆总管扩张,直径大于8 mm(B);切开胆总管取石后,导丝探查可通过胆总管开口(C);胆道镜下置入胆道支架(D);支架侧翼完全进入胆道(E);胆总管一期缝合(F)
表1 两组胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者围手术期一般临床资料比较
组别 LCBDE组 ERCP组 统计值 P
例数 33 33    
性别     0.243 0.622
16(48.48) 18(54.55) 0.154 0.132
17(51.52) 15(45.45) 0.176 0.098
年龄(岁)a 53.27±8.06 49.30±7.05 0.235 1.021
白细胞计数(×109/L)a        
术前 7.82±1.05 10.77±1.34 0.012 0.986
术后3 d 7.83±1.03 9.83±1.21 0.321 0.635
C反应蛋白(mg/L)a        
术前 15.22±1.89 17.17±2.01 0.123 0.874
术后3 d 33.72±3.12 33.39±5.31 0.456 0.352
降钙素原(μg/L)a        
术前 2.34±0.15 0.12±0.01 0.056 0.098
术后3 d 1.02±0.02 1.20±0.03 0.253 1.650
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L)a        
术前 284.70±50.12 35.91±5.20 1.324 0.051
术后3 d 93.75±10.23 108.94±11.23 0.698 0.210
γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(U/L)a        
术前 422.97±89.03 320.54±56.21 2.698 0.064
术后3 d 222.85±12.31 181.70.81±13.12 0.985 0.098
总胆红素(μmol/L)a        
术前 86.7±3.42 47.84±5.15 1.874 0.078
术后3 d 31.01±5.31 30.12±5.23 0.321 1.256
淀粉酶(U/L)a        
术前 144.38±8.56 564.03±101.10 3.685 0.053
术后3 d 87.91±15.63 94.11±18.53 1.365 0.035
合并疾病        
高血压 8(24.24) 7(21.21) 0.986 0.875
心脑血管病 5(15.15) 2(6.06) 0.236 0.062
糖尿病 0(0) 1(3.03) 0.025 0.058
ASA分级        
10(30.30) 11(33.33) 0.984 0.867
14(42.42) 21(63.64) 0.754 0.587
9(27.27) 0(0) 1.265 0.012b
0(0) 1(3.03) 0.635 0.514
结石直径(cm) 1.40±0.12 0.66±0.03 0.521 0.060
结石数量(个) 1.96±0.65 1.30±0.08 0.765 0.124
结石嵌顿 3(9.09) 1(3.03) 0.241 0.071
[1]
Liu B, Wu DS, Cao PK, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic extraction and balloon dilation for simultaneous gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: A novel technique[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(33): 3799-3805.
[2]
Palermo M, Fendrich I, Ronchi A, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using a single-operator cholangioscope[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(9): 989-992.
[3]
Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(9): 3763-3776.
[4]
李超, 汪宏, 刘玉海, 等. 双镜联合胆总管探查术胆管自脱落支架置入与T管引流的临床疗效比较[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 112-115.
[5]
Xu Y, Dong C, Ma K, et al. Spontaneously removed biliary stent drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(39): e5011.
[6]
Padmore G, Sutherland FR, Ball CG. The art and craft of biliary T-tube use[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021, 91(2): e46-e49.
[7]
徐垚, 安东均, 冯金鸽, 等. 胆总管探查一期缝合鼻胆管引流与T管引流治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(4): 288-292.
[8]
Liu D, Cao F, Liu J, et al. Risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 1.
[9]
Yin Y, He K, Xia X. Comparison of primary suture and t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative choledochoscopy in the treatment of secondary common bile duct stones: A single-center retrospective analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(6): 612-619.
[10]
王国泰, 杨兴武, 王旗, 等. 一期与分期微创术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019, 34(12): 1056-1059.
[11]
王海龙, 索灵宇, 韩唯杰, 等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆管可控式自脱支架治疗胆总管结石合并胆管炎的临床观察[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(5): 374-378.
[12]
赵培忠. 腹胆双镜下胆囊切除联合胆总管探查取石一期缝合术治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的疗效观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2018, 42(4): 431-432.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[11] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[12] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要