切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 193 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.03.007

论著

经鼻空肠营养管置入技术在全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中的应用:附视频
郭洪海, 胡奕炀, 田园, 庞悦, 杨家轩, 杨沛刚, 丁平安, 赵群()   
  1. 050011 石家庄,河北医科大学第四医院外三科 河北省胃癌精准诊断与综合治疗重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-04 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 赵群
  • 基金资助:
    政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目(2019012); 河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(ZD2019139); 河北适宜卫生技术库入库项目(2019024)

Application of transnasal jejunal nutrition tube placement in total da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: video attached

Honghai Guo, Yiyang Hu, Yuan Tian, Yue Pang, Jiaxuan Yang, Peigang Yang, Ping’an Ding, Qun Zhao()   

  1. The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
  • Received:2022-11-04 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Qun Zhao
引用本文:

郭洪海, 胡奕炀, 田园, 庞悦, 杨家轩, 杨沛刚, 丁平安, 赵群. 经鼻空肠营养管置入技术在全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中的应用:附视频[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 193-196.

Honghai Guo, Yiyang Hu, Yuan Tian, Yue Pang, Jiaxuan Yang, Peigang Yang, Ping’an Ding, Qun Zhao. Application of transnasal jejunal nutrition tube placement in total da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: video attached[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 193-196.

目的

探讨并总结经鼻空肠营养管置入技术在全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中的应用技巧及体会,以及置管过程中常见问题及解决方法。

方法

收集2019年12月至2021年9月河北医科大学第四医院行全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中置入经鼻空肠营养管的192例患者资料,总结操作步骤,记录术中营养管置入时间、术后经管行肠内营养开始时间、首次排气时间、肠内营养并发症等情况。

结果

192例患者中远端胃切除129例(均为毕Ⅱ式+Braun’s吻合),全胃切除39例(均为食管-空肠π式吻合),近端胃切除24例(均为空肠间置吻合),置管满意183例(95.31%),置管耗时(3.65±2.15)min,术后肠内营养开始时间为(16.59±2.43)h,首次排气时间为(3.26±1.52)d;除11例(5.73%)出现喂养不耐受外,181例(94.27%)耐受良好。

结论

全达芬奇机器人下胃癌根治术中经鼻置入空肠营养管安全有效,整体上不影响手术时长,是早期开展肠内营养治疗的基础。

Objective

To summarize the application skills, experience, common problems and solutions in the process of naso-jejunal feeding tube placement in total da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy.

Methods

192 cases with gastric cancer undergoing naso-jejunal feeding tube placement during total da Vinci robotic D2 radical gastrectomy in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between December 2019 and September 2021 were reviewed. The time of naso-jejunal tube insertion, enteral nutrition through tube after operation, first exhaust, and the enteral nutrition-related complications were recorded.

Results

129 cases underwent distal gastrectomy (Billroth’sⅡ+Braun’s anastomosis), 39 cases underwent total gastrectomy (esophageal jejunal π anastomosis), and 24 cases underwent proximal gastrectomy (jejunal interposition anastomosis). 183 cases were satisfied with catheterization, the average time of tube placement was (3.65±2.15) min, the time of enteral nutrition after operation was (16.59±2.43) h, and the time of first exhaust was (3.26±1.52) d. Except for 11 cases with feeding intolerance, the rest of the patients had good tolerance.

Conclusions

The placement of transnasal jejunal nutrition tube in total da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy is safe and effective, which does not affect the length of operation as a whole, and is the basis for early enteral nutrition therapy.

图1 全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中经鼻空肠营养管置入过程关键要点 残胃-空肠共同开口完成后机械臂辅助经鼻空肠营养管通过吻合口(A);进入空肠输出襻内3~4 cm(B);于空肠内下行(C);机械臂摆正空肠位置辅助空肠营养管通过空肠-空肠侧侧吻合口(D);食管-空肠吻合中机械臂辅助经鼻空肠营养管进入空肠远端(E);近端胃中经鼻空肠营养管通过残胃-空肠吻合(F)
图2 经鼻空肠营养管置入过程中常见问题 远端胃中鼻胃管无法通过残胃-空肠吻合口(A);进入残胃-空肠输入襻(B);空肠痉挛阻碍鼻胃管通过(C);全胃切除中鼻胃管无法通过食管-空肠吻合口(D)
[1]
Li B, Liu HY, Guo SH, et al. Impact of early postoperative enteral nutrition on clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2015, 14(2): 7136-7141.
[2]
Kubota T, Shoda K, Konishi H, et al. Nutrition update in gastric cancer surgery[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(4): 360-368.
[3]
陈大伟, 崔龙, 全志伟, 等. 2 092例肠内营养置管方法分析[J]. 中华临床营养杂志, 2009, 17(3): 141-143.
[4]
Sun C, Lv B, Zheng W, et al. The learning curve in blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tubes: data from a multicentre, prospective observational study[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(5): 1884-1896.
[5]
Portanova M. Successful enteral nutrition in the treatment of esophagojejunal fistula after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2010, 8: 71.
[6]
Tao Z, Zhang Y, Zhu S, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing jejunostomy and nasogastric feeding in minimally invasive mcKeown esophagectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(10): 2187-2196.
[7]
Zhang Z, Xu X, Ding J, et al. Comparison of postpyloric tube feeding and gastric tube feeding in intensive care unit patients: A meta-analysis[J]. Nutr Clin Pract, 2013, 28(3): 371-380.
[8]
Zhao Q, Li Y, Yu B, et al. Effects of preoperative enteral nutrition on postoperative recent nutritional status in patients with siewert Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Nutr Cancer, 2018, 70(6): 895-903.
[9]
陈宁, 何中元, 赵良柱. 肠内营养支持治疗在食管癌术后吻合口瘘患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(9): 1062-1064.
[10]
陈平, 丁国平, 郑祺, 等. 快速康复外科理念在胃癌围手术期中的应用[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2010, 19(6): 669-672.
[11]
Guerrini GP, Esposito G, Magistri P, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the largest meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 82: 210-228.
[12]
Chang W, Wei Y, Ren L, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic rectal surgery-from the real word data of 1 145 consecutive cases in China[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(9): 4079-4088.
[13]
Shin HJ, Son SY, Wang B, et al. Long-term comparison of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-weighted analysis of 2 084 consecutive patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(1): 128-137.
[14]
田园, 林叶成, 李勇, 等. 达芬奇机器人胃癌手术学习曲线[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(3): 151-155.
[15]
Tian Y, Lin Y, Guo H, et al. Safety and efficacy of carbon nanoparticle suspension injection and indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection during robotic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(5): 3209-3216.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[6] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[7] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[8] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[9] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[10] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[11] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[12] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[13] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[14] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[15] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?