切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 92 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2024.02.002

论著

胆管内乳头状肿瘤手术切除的临床回顾性分析
梁倚华1, 廖冰2, 陆世旬3, 蔡木炎3, 王霁朏4, 张仲平1, 叶伟佳1, 赖佳明1, 梁力建1, 殷晓煜1, 陈东1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院肝胆胰外科中心
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院病理科
    3. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院放射科
    4. 510060 广州,中山大学肿瘤防治中心病理科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈东
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2019A1515011466)

Retrospective analysis of surgical resection of intraductal papillary tumor of the bile duct

Yihua Liang1, Bing Liao2, Shixun Lu3, Muyan Cai3, Jifei Wang1, Zhongping Zhang1, Weijia Ye1, Jiaming Lai1, Lijian Liang1, Xiaoyu Yin1, Dong Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery , Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Department of Pathology,4Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2024-02-20 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Dong Chen
引用本文:

梁倚华, 廖冰, 陆世旬, 蔡木炎, 王霁朏, 张仲平, 叶伟佳, 赖佳明, 梁力建, 殷晓煜, 陈东. 胆管内乳头状肿瘤手术切除的临床回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 92-98.

Yihua Liang, Bing Liao, Shixun Lu, Muyan Cai, Jifei Wang, Zhongping Zhang, Weijia Ye, Jiaming Lai, Lijian Liang, Xiaoyu Yin, Dong Chen. Retrospective analysis of surgical resection of intraductal papillary tumor of the bile duct[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 92-98.

目的

通过大样本手术切除病例分析,探讨胆管内乳头状肿瘤(IPNB)的临床特征和治疗策略。

方法

回顾性分析2006 年9 月至2022 年10 月,国内2 个大型医疗中心收治的94 例手术切除IPNB 患者资料。结果 (1)IPNB 术前仅21.3%(20/94)正确诊断,38.3%(36/94)术前诊断为胆管癌,MRI(MRCP)术前诊断正确性相对较高(24.1%,13/54)。典型影像学表现为胆管扩张合并胆管内肿物,新发现胆总管末端鸟嘴样狭窄也是一个重要特征。(2)38 例(40.4%)肿瘤位于左半肝,为最常见发病部位;IPNB 伴低级别、高级别上皮内瘤变各15 例(16.0%)、33 例(35.1%),为良性肿瘤;浸润性癌46 例(48.9%),为恶性肿瘤;肿瘤部位、多发肿瘤、分泌黏液与IPNB 良恶性无关。(3)患者均手术切除,其中肝切除72 例,肝外胆管切除合并胆肠吻合9 例,Whipple 13 例,R0 切除率为95.7%;61 例行淋巴结清扫,淋巴结阳性率3.3%(2/61)。(4)术后1、3、5、10 年生存率分别为91.1%、82.0%、73.5%、44.0%;单因素分析显示体质量是否下降、CA125 是否升高、肿瘤良恶性与患者远期预后有关(P<0.05);多因素分析显示恶性肿瘤是远期预后的独立危险因素(OR=2.479,95% CI:1.127~5.453,P=0.024)。与良性IPNB 相比,恶性IPNB 的中位生存时间更短(14.3 年vs 8.4 年,P<0.05)。

结论

IPNB 术前难以正确诊断,近半数为浸润性癌,淋巴结阳性率低;术前需明确胆管内肿物位置及病变范围,必要时术中胆道镜检查;注意留取胆管切缘术中冰冻活检,以达到根治性切除;术后可选择性辅助治疗;IPNB 远期预后良好,恶性肿瘤是其独立危险因素。

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) through a large sample case analysis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of the data of 94 patients with IPNB, admitted to two large medical centers in China from September 2006 to October 2022.

Results

(1) Only 21.3% (20/94) of IPNB patients were correctly diagnosed before surgery, and 38.3% (36/94) were misdiagnosed as cholangiocarcinoma.Compared to other preoperative examinations, MRI/MRCP had a higher diagnostic accuracy of 24.1% (13/54).The typical imaging manifestation was bile duct dilation combined with intraductal tumor, and the newly recognized finding of specific characteristic as bird's beak like stenosis at the end of the common bile duct might be an important feature.(2) 38 cases of tumors were located in the left liver, accounting for 40.4%, which is the most common location.Pathologically, IPNB with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were 15 cases (16.0%),high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were 33 cases (35.1%), and invasive cancer were 46 cases (48.9%).The first two were defined as benign tumors, while the latter was defined as malignant tumors.The location of the tumor and whether it secretes mucus were not related to the malignancy of IPNB.(3) All patients underwent surgical resection, including 72 cases of liver resection, 9 cases of extrahepatic bile duct resection combined with biliary intestinal anastomosis, and 13 cases of Whipple.The R0 resection rate was 95.7%, with 61 cases undergoing lymph node dissection and the lymph node positivity rate was 3.3% (2/61).(4) The postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 91.1%, 82.0%, 73.5%, and 44.0%, respectively.Univariate analysis showed that weight loss, CA125 elevation, tumor malignancy were related to long-term prognosis of patients (P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that tumor malignancy alone was an independent risk factor for long-term prognosis (OR=2.479, 95% CI: 1.127-5.453, P=0.024).Compared with benign IPNB,malignant IPNB had shorter survival time, with median survival time of 14.3 and 8.4 years, respectively(P<0.05).

Conclusions

IPNB is difficult to be diagnosed correctly before surgery, with nearly half being invasive cancer and a low lymph node positivity rate.Radical resection surgery should clarify the extent of the lesion before surgery, and if necessary, intraoperative cholangioscopy needs to be performed.In order to attain radical resection, the cutting edge of the bile duct should be provided for intraoperative frozen biopsy.Selective adjuvant treatment can be performed after surgery.The long-term prognosis of IPNB is good, and tumor malignancy is an independent risk factor.

图1 胆管内乳头状肿瘤的典型影像学表现 病例A(MRI,T2WI)示肝左叶胆管明显扩张,内可见多发结节、斑片状影,低信号;病例B(MRCP)示胆管全程扩张,未见明显肿物,胆总管末端鸟嘴样狭窄;病例C(CT 增强扫描,动脉期)示左肝内分叶型囊实性占位,囊内可见稍低密度结节,囊腔与胆管相通
图2 胆管内乳头状肿瘤大体外观和光学显微镜下表现A 示扩张的胆管腔内稀薄的黏液(箭头所示);B 示胆管内乳头状肿物(箭头所示);C 示管腔内残留的黏液(左上角,苏木精-伊红染色,×10);D 示胆管腔内大量乳头状分支结构,由增殖的胆管上皮细胞包绕纤维血管构成(苏木精-伊红染色,×40)
表1 胆管内乳头状肿瘤患者肿瘤组织病理免疫组织化学标志物表达情况[n(%)]
表2 胆管内乳头状肿瘤患者不同手术方式的情况
表3 胆管内乳头状肿瘤预后的单因素分析结果[例(%)]
图3 胆管内乳头状肿瘤良恶性分组的生存曲线
[1]
Kubota K, Jang JY, Nakanuma Y, et al.Clinicopathological characteristics of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: A Japan-Korea collaborative study[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2020, 27(9): 581-597.
[2]
Kubo S, Tanaka S, Kinoshita M, et al.Development of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct in patients with occupational cholangiocarcinoma[J].Virchows Arch, 2023, 482(4): 745-753.
[3]
Krawczyk M, Ziarkiewicz-Wróblewska B, Podgórska J, et al.Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct - a comprehensive review[J].Adv Med Sci, 2021, 66(1): 138-147.
[4]
Minagawa N, Sato N, Mori Y, et al.A comparison between intraductal papillary neoplasms of the biliary tract (BT-IPMNs)and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas(P-IPMNs) reveals distinct clinical manifestations and outcomes[J].Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013, 39(6): 554-558.
[5]
Youn JM, Hwang S, Ahn CS, et al.Clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct of the liver: single-institution experience with 146 patients[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2022, 26(7): 1394-1405.
[6]
吴昕, 李秉璐, 郑朝纪, 等.胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤的临床病理特征与治疗策略[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(8): 876-882.
[7]
Kim JR, Jang KT, Jang JY.Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: review of updated clinicopathological and imaging characteristics[J].Br J Surg, 2023, 110(9): 1229-1240.
[8]
Gordon-Weeks AN, Jones K, Harriss E, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of current experience in treating ipnb: clinical and pathological correlates[J].Ann Surg, 2016, 263(4): 656-663.
[9]
Wan X, Shi J, Wang A, et al.Gallbladder papillary neoplasms share pathological features with intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct[J].Oncotarget, 2017, 8(19): 31532-31539.
[10]
陈东, 梁倚华, 廖冰, 等.胆管内乳头状肿瘤的研究进展[J].岭南现代临床外科, 2022, 22(2): 194-198, 204.
[11]
楼健颖, 粟伟, 魏树梅, 等.胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤的临床特征及诊治分析[J].中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(5): 350-354.
[12]
Aslam A, Wasnik AP, Shi J, et al.Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB): CT and MRI appearance with radiologypathology correlation[J].Clin Imaging, 2020, 66: 10-17.
[13]
Jeon SK, Lee JM, Yoo J, et al.Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: diagnostic value of MRI features in differentiating pathologic subclassifications-type 1 versus type 2[J].Eur Radiol,2023.
[14]
Kraus M, Klang E, Soffer S, et al.MRI features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile ducts,“ The myth about the cyst”: A systematic review[J].Eur J Radiol Open, 2023, 11:100515.
[15]
郭伟, 汪栋, 吴鸿伟.胆管内乳头状肿瘤的临床病理特征分析[J].国际外科学杂志, 2019, 46(8): 559-563.
[16]
Kim JR, Jang KT, Jang JY, et al.Clinicopathologic analysis of intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct: Korean multicenter cohort study[J].HPB (Oxford), 2020, 22(8): 1139-1148.
[17]
Nakanuma Y, Jang KT, Fukushima N, et al.A statement by the Japan-Korea expert pathologists for future clinicopathological and molecular analyses toward consensus building of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct through several opinions at the present stage[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25(3): 181-187.
[18]
Onoe S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al.A clinicopathological reappraisal of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct(IPNB): A continuous spectrum with papillary cholangiocarcinoma in 181 curatively resected cases[J].HPB (Oxford), 2021, 23(10):1525-1532.
[19]
Bagante F, Weiss M, Alexandrescu S, et al.Long-term outcomes of patients with intraductal growth sub-type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J].HPB (Oxford), 2018, 20(12): 1189-1197.
[20]
Kageyama Y, Yamaguchi R, Watanabe S, et al.Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct with rapidly progressive multicentric recurrence: A case report[J].Int J Surg Case Rep,2018, 51: 102-106.
[1] 唐浩然, 周彪, 巴特, 李洋洋. 严重烧伤后脓毒症早期诊断相关生物标记物的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(01): 70-74.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后预置造口与襻式回肠造口短期疗效评价:一项倾向性评分匹配队列研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 21-27.
[3] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[4] 韦洋, 赵远权, 王小波, 黄海, 陈洁. BCLC 0/A期肝细胞癌患者术后辅助治疗后早期复发风险分析及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 157-161.
[5] 李峥, 马晋峰. 基于炎症反应评分系统构建预测根治性术后食管胃结合部腺癌患者预后的列线图模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 170-175.
[6] 董家旭, 宋美姿, 毕讯. 射频消融术联合TSH抑制治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的效果及生存预后分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 200-203.
[7] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-8.
[8] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-17.
[9] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病诊疗中国专家共识(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 1-12.
[10] 汪玥, 陆衡, 曹洁, 陆博文. GNG4蛋白在胃肠道间质瘤中的表达及预后意义[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 6-10.
[11] 王海晶, 米思蓉, 高晶. 胃癌患者血清IGFBP1表达水平与临床病理特征的相关性及其诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 11-15.
[12] 赵鸿鹰, 江荣科, 王宇, 朱梅, 李艳芳. CEACAM19调控PI3K/AKT信号通路对胃癌发病及预后判断的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 16-22.
[13] 张海玲, 陈丹丹, 朱季军, 王晓燕, 张诗琪. 多层螺旋CT联合血清miR-17检测预测胃癌淋巴结转移风险的效果[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 23-28.
[14] 李芳芳, 刘晓红, 孙燕滨. 窄带成像技术在幽门螺杆菌感染胃早期癌变诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 29-33.
[15] 段红良, 赵红梅, 李涛, 辛建锋. 结直肠癌组织SPOCD1表达与临床病理特征及术后复发转移的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 40-45.
阅读次数
全文


摘要