切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (05) : 420 -423. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2010.05.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

扩大肝部分切除术后入肝门静脉动脉化对大鼠血流动力学的影响
熊大芾1, 张百萌2, 关晓东2, 刘琦2, 蔡潮农2, 郭辉3, 李坚2,()   
  1. 1. 519000 珠海市第二人民医院
    2. 中山大学附属第五医院普外3科
    3. 中山大学附属第五医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-24 出版日期:2010-10-01
  • 通信作者: 李坚
  • 基金资助:
    珠海市科技局医药卫生重大项目(PB20081002)

Hymodynamics study with rats of portal vein arterialization after extended hepatectomy

Da-fu XIONG1, Bai-meng ZHANG2, Xiao-dong GUAN2, Qi LIU2, Chao-nong CAI2, Hui GUO3, Jian LI2,()   

  1. 1. the Second People’s Hospital, Zhuhai 519000, China
  • Received:2010-04-24 Published:2010-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jian LI
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: LI Jian, Email:
引用本文:

熊大芾, 张百萌, 关晓东, 刘琦, 蔡潮农, 郭辉, 李坚. 扩大肝部分切除术后入肝门静脉动脉化对大鼠血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2010, 04(05): 420-423.

Da-fu XIONG, Bai-meng ZHANG, Xiao-dong GUAN, Qi LIU, Chao-nong CAI, Hui GUO, Jian LI. Hymodynamics study with rats of portal vein arterialization after extended hepatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2010, 04(05): 420-423.

目的

对大鼠行扩大肝部分切除术后利用右肾动脉行入肝门静脉动脉化加门腔分流术,研究该术式对大鼠门静脉血流动力学的影响。

方法

Sprague-Dawley大鼠130只,分为A组(动脉化组)47只,行70%扩大肝部分切除术后,用右肾动脉行门静脉动脉化加门腔分流术;B组(肝切组)43只,行70%扩大肝部分切除及右肾切除,阻断门静脉10 min;C组(对照组)40只,仅行右肾切除及门静脉主干游离。分别于术后第2、7、14、28天检测门静脉压力、内径和血流量。

结果

A组及B组手术成功率分别为85.1%和93.0%,差异无统计学意义,C组手术成功率100%。术后各时间点A组与B、C组比较,入肝门静脉压力、门静脉内径、血流速度和入肝血流量变化均较后两组更明显(P<0.01);A组入肝门静脉压力随时间推移有下降趋势,于术后第14天(12.7±0.7)cm H2O达到稳态,与术后第28天(12.4±0.6)cm H2O比较,差异无统计学意义;而A组门静脉内径、血流速度和入肝血流量在术后各时间点间相比差异无统计学意义。B组术后门静脉血流速度均较C组增快(P<0.05),门静脉血流量在术后14~28 d较C组增加(P<0.05)。

结论

大鼠扩大肝部分切除术后行入肝门静脉动脉化模型稳定可靠,手术成功率理想,动脉化术后门静脉压力明显升高,门静脉内径出现扩张以适应压力变化,入肝血流量明显增加。门静脉血流动力学指标在术后早期即发生改变并取得稳态。

Ojective

To investigate the effects of portal vein arterialization(PVA) associated with portacaval shunt after extended hepatectomy on hepatic hemodynamics.

Methods

One hundred and thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A(PVA group), PVA associated with portocaval shunt after 70% PH; Group B(PH group),70% PH associated with right nephrectomy; Group C(control group), right nephrectomy only. The success rate of operation was and calculated, the pressure, diameter, blood flow velocity and inflow blood of portal vein were investigated at day 2, 7, 14, 28 days after operation, respectively.

Results

The success rate of operation in Group A, B and Group C were 85.1%, 93% and 100%, respectively. There was no significant difference between Group A and B. In Group A, the pressure, diameter, blood flow velocity and blood inflow of portal vein increased significantly and kept a stable higher level after surgery compared with the other two groups, P<0.01. The portal vein pressure reached the peak at postoperative 2 days and fell slowly with the passage of time, then remained stably 14 days after surgery in Group A. From postoperative 14 to 28 days, the blood inflow of portal vein in Group B were higher than Group C, P<0.05. And blood flow velocity in Group B was always faster than Group C after surgery.

Conclusion

The risk of PVA associated with portocaval shunt after extended hepatectomy procedure is not increased, the hymodynamics of the portal vein achieve a new balance at a higher level in 2 days and kept stable within 28 days after surgery.

图4 大鼠70%肝部分切除,切除肝左外叶及左内+中叶
表1 3组大鼠术后入肝脏门静脉压力(cm H2O)(n=10,±s
图7 门静脉动脉化后可见血流由腹主动脉如肾动脉进入门静脉,门静脉内径扩张
表2 3组入肝门静脉内径、最大血流速、血流量的情况(±s, n=10)
1
Ott R,Bohner C,Muller S, et al. Outcome of patients with pre existing portal vein thrombosis undergoing arterialization of the portal vein during liver transplantation. Transpl Int, 2003, 16(1): 15-20.
2
Maggi U,Camagni S,Reggiani P, et al. Portal vein arterialization for hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplantation: a case report, Doppler-ultrasound aspects, and review of the literature. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(4): 1369-1374.
3
Ott R,Schuppan D,Tannapfel A, et al. Portal vein arterialization as a technical option in liver transplantation: impact on function, regeneration,and morphology of the liver following hemihepatectomy in pigs. Liver Int, 2003, 23(1): 54-62.
4
Nardo B.,Puviani L.,Prezzi D., et al. Protective effect of portal vein arterialization in acute liver failureinduced by hepatectomy in normal and fatty liver rat. Transplantation Proc, 2006, 38(10): 3249-3250.
5
Piecuch J,Orkisz W,Gabriel A, et al. Liver regeneration following portal blood arterialization and splenectomy in acute hepatic failure. Hepatogastroent erology, 2007, 54(77): 1546-1550.
6
李坚,刘琦,关晓东, 等. 利用右肾动脉行入肝门静脉动脉化加门腔分流术的实验研究. 中华普通外科杂志, 2010, 25(3): 227-230.
7
刘琦,李坚,关晓东, 等. 入肝门静脉动脉化加门腔分流术对肝硬化大鼠血流动力学的影响. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2010, 4(2): 109-113.
8
Higgins GM,Anderson RM. Experimental pathology of the liver: Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol, 1931, 12: 186-202.
9
Shimizu Y,Miyazaki M,Shimizu H, et al. Beneficial effects of arterialization of the portal vein on extended hepatectomy. Br J Surg, 2000, 87(6): 784-789.
10
陈永亮,黄志强,赵建更, 等. 部分门静脉动脉化重建肝血流的实验研究. 中华普通外科杂志, 2002, 17(5): 289-290.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[8] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[9] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
[10] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[11] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[12] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
[13] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[14] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?