切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 218 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2011.03.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的学习曲线
郑朝旭1,(), 王俊1, 陈流华1, 余俊峰1, 阮莹2   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院微创外科
    2. 中山大学中山医学院
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-05 出版日期:2011-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郑朝旭
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2010B031600212)

Learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Chao-xu ZHENG1,(), Jun WANG1, Liu-hua CHEN1, Jun-feng YU1, Ying RUAN2   

  1. 1. Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2011-03-05 Published:2011-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Chao-xu ZHENG
  • About author:
    Corresonding author: ZHENG Chao-xu, Email:
引用本文:

郑朝旭, 王俊, 陈流华, 余俊峰, 阮莹. 腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 05(03): 218-222.

Chao-xu ZHENG, Jun WANG, Liu-hua CHEN, Jun-feng YU, Ying RUAN. Learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2011, 05(03): 218-222.

目的

评估腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)不同阶段的手术效果,探讨LS的学习曲线问题。

方法

回顾性分析2003年5月至2010年3月期间同一主刀医生完成的105例LS治疗ITP的临床资料。按入院顺序分为A、B、C 3组,每组35例,比较3组手术时间、术中出血量、术后48 h总引流量、并发症发生率及术后住院时间等效果指标。

结果

所有患者无需中转传统手术。线性回归分析显示手术例数与手术时间、术中出血量均呈线性关系(相关系数分别为-0.408和-0.234,P值分别为<0.001和0.016)。3组手术时间分别为(125.0±33.5)min、(111.8±26.3)min和(100.1±25.7)min(P=0.002),术中出血量分别为(95.7±166.0)ml、(64.3±100.8)ml和(38.3±34.3)ml(P=0.007)。两两比较,A组与C组手术时间和术中出血量差异有显著性(P值分别为0.001和0.002)。3组术后48小时总引流量、并发症发生率及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义。

结论

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜是安全可行的。随着手术例数增加,手术时间和术中出血量逐渐减少。学习曲线约为35例,可达到较熟练程度。

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at different stages in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura(ITP), and to define the learning curve of LS.

Methods

The clinical data of 105 cases of LS performed for ITP by same surgeon between May 2003 and March 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The cases were divided into group A, B and C with 35 cases in each group according to the sequence of hospitalization. The surgical outcomes of three group, including operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, estimated 48-hour volumes of postoperative drainage, major morbidity, and postoperative hospitalization time, were compared subsequently.

Results

No convertion to traditional operation was needed in all the patients. There were linear relationships between operative number and operative time or estimated intraoperative blood loss (correlation coefficients were -0.408 and -0.234, respectively, P<0.001 and 0.016, respectively). Operative times of three groups were (125.0±33.5) min, (111.8±26.3) min, and (100.1±25.7) min, respectively (P=0.002). Estimated intraoperative blood losses were (95.7±166.0) ml, (64.3±100.8) ml, and (38.3±34.3) ml, respectively(P=0.007). When comparing between two groups, statistical diferences of operative times and estimated intraoperative blood losses were found between goup A and C (P values were 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). There were no significant diferences of estimated 48-hour volumes of postoperative drainage, major morbidity, and postoperative hospitalization time among three groups.

Conclusions

LS for ITP is safe and feasible. Operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss decrease significantly with the increase of operative number. The learning curve is about 35 cases to reach proficiency.

表1 3组术前一般资料的比较(各35例)
图1 病例数与手术时间的直线回归分析(相关系数=-0.408,P<0.001)
图2 病例数与术中出血量的直线回归分析(相关系数=-0.234,P=0.016)
表2 3组手术效果的比较(各35例)
1
Bellows CF, Sweeney JF. Laparoscopic splenectomy: present status and future perspective. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2006, 3(1): 95-104.
2
Targarona EM, Trias M. Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen. World J Surg, 2007, 31(6): 1363-1364.
3
Bell RL, Reinhardt KE, Cho E, et al. A ten-year, single institution experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. JSLS, 2005, 9(2):163-168.
4
Pomp A, Gagner M, Salky B, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: a selected retrospective review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2005, 15(3): 139-143.
5
Winslow ER, Brunt M. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery, 2003, 134(4): 647-655.
6
Willsher PC. Laparoscopic splenectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2007, 77(9):714-715.
7
Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Belli S, et al. Reaching proficiency in laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15(32): 4005-4008.
8
Peters MB Jr, Camacho D, Ojeda H, et al. Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(5): 522-525.
9
Chan SW, Hensman C, Waxman BP, et al. Technical developments and a team approach leads to an improved outcome: lessons learnt implementing laparoscopic splenectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2002, 72(7): 523-527.
[1] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[2] 吴鹏, 许维, 王壮, 郑世海, 宋劲松. 隧道法行腹腔镜下脾切除术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 319-322.
[3] 江东根, 依力夏提·艾力, 依布拉音江·阿布力克木, 依力盼·依拉木, 冯瑶, 艾尼玩·木拉克, 艾克拜尔江·阿里木. 基层医院单一术者改良单通道腹腔镜下鞘状突环扎术学习曲线及体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 560-565.
[4] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[5] 钟魁艳, 邓黎, 姚远洋, 凌开建, 邓媛, 李秋蓉, 王延洲. "筷子技术"于经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除手术的可行性和学习曲线[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 45-50.
[6] 严斌, 缪慧娴, 王酉, 狄文, 楼微华. 经阴道内镜与单孔腹腔镜在子宫切除术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 39-44.
[7] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[8] 卓文锋, 曾桂芳, 杨思加, 赵家立, 邹宝嘉, 白子锐, 林恩, 李坚. 腹腔镜巨脾切除术:逐步打破的手术壁垒[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 783-788.
[9] 邢颖, 程石. 巨脾外科治疗现状与介入治疗序贯手术策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 253-258.
[10] 廖艳, 成伟. 腹腔镜技术在胰腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 259-264.
[11] 张宇, 余灵祥, 赵亮, 张宁, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 刘佳, 李鹏, 任辉. 利伐沙班在脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉血栓预防中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 195-199.
[12] 苏日顺, 卢逸, 庄宝鼎, 张译, 李彦杰, 徐见亮. 肝硬化脾亢脾切除术后门静脉血栓形成影响因素[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 39-44.
[13] 许英晨, 张红, 付建柱, 张立军, 计嘉军. 脾脉管瘤合并脾囊肿一例报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 93-95.
[14] 陈海鹏, 张金珠, 关旭, 赵志勋, 刘恒昌, 姜争, 刘正, 王锡山. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠及乙状结肠癌根治术的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 205-208.
[15] 邵佳申, 张志武, 孟海, 杨雍, 费琦. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和学习曲线研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 202-208.
阅读次数
全文


摘要