切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 218 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2011.03.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的学习曲线
郑朝旭1,(), 王俊1, 陈流华1, 余俊峰1, 阮莹2   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院微创外科
    2. 中山大学中山医学院
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-05 出版日期:2011-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郑朝旭
  • 基金资助:
    广东省科技计划项目(2010B031600212)

Learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Chao-xu ZHENG1,(), Jun WANG1, Liu-hua CHEN1, Jun-feng YU1, Ying RUAN2   

  1. 1. Department of Minimal Invasive Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2011-03-05 Published:2011-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Chao-xu ZHENG
  • About author:
    Corresonding author: ZHENG Chao-xu, Email:
引用本文:

郑朝旭, 王俊, 陈流华, 余俊峰, 阮莹. 腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的学习曲线[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 05(03): 218-222.

Chao-xu ZHENG, Jun WANG, Liu-hua CHEN, Jun-feng YU, Ying RUAN. Learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2011, 05(03): 218-222.

目的

评估腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)不同阶段的手术效果,探讨LS的学习曲线问题。

方法

回顾性分析2003年5月至2010年3月期间同一主刀医生完成的105例LS治疗ITP的临床资料。按入院顺序分为A、B、C 3组,每组35例,比较3组手术时间、术中出血量、术后48 h总引流量、并发症发生率及术后住院时间等效果指标。

结果

所有患者无需中转传统手术。线性回归分析显示手术例数与手术时间、术中出血量均呈线性关系(相关系数分别为-0.408和-0.234,P值分别为<0.001和0.016)。3组手术时间分别为(125.0±33.5)min、(111.8±26.3)min和(100.1±25.7)min(P=0.002),术中出血量分别为(95.7±166.0)ml、(64.3±100.8)ml和(38.3±34.3)ml(P=0.007)。两两比较,A组与C组手术时间和术中出血量差异有显著性(P值分别为0.001和0.002)。3组术后48小时总引流量、并发症发生率及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义。

结论

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜是安全可行的。随着手术例数增加,手术时间和术中出血量逐渐减少。学习曲线约为35例,可达到较熟练程度。

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at different stages in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura(ITP), and to define the learning curve of LS.

Methods

The clinical data of 105 cases of LS performed for ITP by same surgeon between May 2003 and March 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The cases were divided into group A, B and C with 35 cases in each group according to the sequence of hospitalization. The surgical outcomes of three group, including operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, estimated 48-hour volumes of postoperative drainage, major morbidity, and postoperative hospitalization time, were compared subsequently.

Results

No convertion to traditional operation was needed in all the patients. There were linear relationships between operative number and operative time or estimated intraoperative blood loss (correlation coefficients were -0.408 and -0.234, respectively, P<0.001 and 0.016, respectively). Operative times of three groups were (125.0±33.5) min, (111.8±26.3) min, and (100.1±25.7) min, respectively (P=0.002). Estimated intraoperative blood losses were (95.7±166.0) ml, (64.3±100.8) ml, and (38.3±34.3) ml, respectively(P=0.007). When comparing between two groups, statistical diferences of operative times and estimated intraoperative blood losses were found between goup A and C (P values were 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). There were no significant diferences of estimated 48-hour volumes of postoperative drainage, major morbidity, and postoperative hospitalization time among three groups.

Conclusions

LS for ITP is safe and feasible. Operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss decrease significantly with the increase of operative number. The learning curve is about 35 cases to reach proficiency.

表1 3组术前一般资料的比较(各35例)
图1 病例数与手术时间的直线回归分析(相关系数=-0.408,P<0.001)
图2 病例数与术中出血量的直线回归分析(相关系数=-0.234,P=0.016)
表2 3组手术效果的比较(各35例)
1
Bellows CF, Sweeney JF. Laparoscopic splenectomy: present status and future perspective. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2006, 3(1): 95-104.
2
Targarona EM, Trias M. Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen. World J Surg, 2007, 31(6): 1363-1364.
3
Bell RL, Reinhardt KE, Cho E, et al. A ten-year, single institution experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. JSLS, 2005, 9(2):163-168.
4
Pomp A, Gagner M, Salky B, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: a selected retrospective review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2005, 15(3): 139-143.
5
Winslow ER, Brunt M. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery, 2003, 134(4): 647-655.
6
Willsher PC. Laparoscopic splenectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2007, 77(9):714-715.
7
Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Belli S, et al. Reaching proficiency in laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Gastroenterol, 2009, 15(32): 4005-4008.
8
Peters MB Jr, Camacho D, Ojeda H, et al. Defining the learning curve for laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(5): 522-525.
9
Chan SW, Hensman C, Waxman BP, et al. Technical developments and a team approach leads to an improved outcome: lessons learnt implementing laparoscopic splenectomy. ANZ J Surg, 2002, 72(7): 523-527.
[1] 黄泽, 张梓榆, 杨青宇, 赖声清, 李海燕. 乳腺腔镜手术临床应用现状及训练路径[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 122-125.
[2] 陈亚峰, 李江斌, 王栋, 臧莉, 鲁建国, 董瑞. 腹腔镜脾切除术在巨脾脾动脉栓塞后远期治疗中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 571-574.
[3] 耿志达, 俞星新, 刘雨, 梁英健. 脾切除术后门静脉血栓形成及其机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 110-113.
[4] 方昌华, 杜霖, 陈鑫楠, 王昊, 王文帝, 张成伟, 秦海翔, 邱雪峰, 庄君龙, 徐林峰, 郭宏骞, 张古田. 以累积和分析法研究保留耻骨后间隙机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 319-325.
[5] 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱辰, 成向明, 魏云飞, 袁琳, 苏健, 朱清毅. 单一术者机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术学习曲线分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 30-35.
[6] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[7] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[8] 陈亚峰, 李江斌, 王栋, 鲁建国, 董瑞. 脾动脉栓塞术后远期腹腔镜巨脾切除术一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 454-456.
[9] 许语阳, 吕云福, 王葆春. 乙肝后肝硬化门静脉高压症脾肿大外科治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 469-473.
[10] 杨林青, 任松, 纪泛扑, 张健, 蒋安, 张丽, 安鹏, 王林, 李宗芳. 揿针疗法对门静脉高压症脾切除断流术后胃肠功能的调节作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 322-326.
[11] 李硕, 周金婵, 李宇, 王卫东. 腹腔镜脾部分切除术在脾脏良性占位性病变中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 96-102.
[12] 张苗苗, 雷蕾, 徐庶钦, 冒健骐, 白纪刚, 耿智敏, 吕毅, 严小鹏. 磁锚定两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 77-81.
[13] 张智春, 周远达, 曾庆昇, 李鹏, 杨红杰, 孙轶. 以CUSUM方法分析腹腔镜层面优先入路直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术的学习曲线[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 200-206.
[14] 刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南. SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-80.
[15] 谭小云, 张靖, 刘珍银, 陈昆山, 夏杰军, 张明, 郭轶群, 陈穗颜. 盲法与超声引导下进行儿童股动脉穿刺的自身对照研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-5,18.
阅读次数
全文


摘要