切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 205 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.03.010

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

HIV感染患者手术风险评分表的设计和应用
刘保池1,(), 冯铁男1, 李垒1, 司炎辉1, 刘启领1, 张伟伟1, 刘新1   
  1. 1. 201508 上海市公共卫生临床中心外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-13 出版日期:2016-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘保池

Design and utility of surgical risk score assessment for HIV-infected patients

Baochi Liu1,(), Tienan Feng1, Lei Li1, Yanhui Si1, Qiling Liu1, Weiwei Zhang1, Xin Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China
  • Received:2015-12-13 Published:2016-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Baochi Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Baochi, Email:
引用本文:

刘保池, 冯铁男, 李垒, 司炎辉, 刘启领, 张伟伟, 刘新. HIV感染患者手术风险评分表的设计和应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(03): 205-208.

Baochi Liu, Tienan Feng, Lei Li, Yanhui Si, Qiling Liu, Weiwei Zhang, Xin Liu. Design and utility of surgical risk score assessment for HIV-infected patients[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(03): 205-208.

目的

设计HIV感染者手术风险评分表,综合分析患者手术后脓毒症和病死率风险。

方法

对2009年1月至2015年6月上海市公共卫生临床中心外科851例HIV感染手术患者的临床数据进行回顾性统计分析,将CD4 T细胞水平、手术切口分类、手术分级、机会性感染、器官功能这5项指标分别分为4个级别,分别赋予1分、2分、3分和4分,检测评估表的敏感度和特异度。

结果

手术后264例(31.0%)发生脓毒症。其中手术后30 d内死亡11例,均死于重度脓毒症,术后病死率1.3%。用评分表进行手术风险评估,分隔阈值为9.5分,>9.5分脓毒症患者的预测正确率有90%,<9.5分时对非脓毒症患者的预测正确率有90%。

结论

本文提出的手术风险评分表可以较准确地预测手术风险,帮助外科医师采用有效的预防措施。

Objective

To design an assessment system to systematically analyze the risk of de-veloping post-operative sepsis and death of HIV-infected patients.

Methods

Eight hundred and fifty-one HIV-infected patients who underwent various surgical procedures from Jan 2008 to Jun 2015 in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center were collected to conduct the retrospective statistical analysis. According the sepsis result, they were divided into two groups. Level of CD4, grade of incision, grade of surgery, opportunistic infections and organ function were scored from 1 to 4 corresponding to the serious-ness. The average score were used to calculate the sensitivity and specific value of the assessment system.

Results

Two hundred and sixty-four patients developed post-operative sepsis. The morbidity rate was 31.0%. Eleven died from serious sepsis in 30 days after surgery. The mortality rate was 1.3%. The average score of sepsis group was 11.50 while it was 7.46 in non-sepsis group. The score of sepsis group was significantly higher. When the cut-off value was set at 9.5, the sensitivity and specificity was 90%.

Conclusion

This assessment system can predict the surgery risk of HIV-infected patients and help surgeons to take preventive steps.

表1 HIV感染者手术风险评分表
图1 脓毒症、非脓毒症和脓毒症死亡3组患者的平均值与95% CI
表2 Logistics回归-以分类变量计算HIV感染各风险指标的结果
图2 基于风险评分加和的风险预测ROC评分
图3 脓毒症、非脓毒症和脓毒症死亡3组患者在各个分值的分布情况
1
Deneve JL,Shantha JG,Page AJ, et al. CD4 count is predictive of outcome in HIV-positive patients undergoing abdominal opera-tions[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 200(6): 694-700.
2
Su J,Tsun A,Zhang L, et al. Preoperative risk factors influencing the incidence of postoperative sepsis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a retrospective cohort study[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(4): 774-779.
3
Liu B,Zhang L,Guo R, et al. Anti-infective treatment in HIV-in-fected patients during perioperative period[J]. AIDS Res Ther, 2012, 9(1): 36.
4
Zhang L,Liu BC,Zhang XY, et al. Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection in HIV-infected patients[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2012, 12: 115.
5
Kedir M. Seroprevalence, pattern and outcome of HIV/AIDS among surgical patients at Gondar University Hospital[J]. Ethiop Med J, 2008, 46(1): 15-18.
6
龙宏纲,邝伟民,朱郇荣. AIDS病人施行外科手术的安全性评价[J].中国艾滋病性病, 2004, 10(3): 185-186.
7
中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病学组.艾滋病诊疗指南(2011版)[J].中华传染病杂志, 2011, 29(10): 629-640.
8
刘保池,李垒,刘立,等. HIV感染者围手术期治疗[J].中国艾滋病性病, 2010, 16(5): 453-455.
9
Stock PG,Barin B,Murphy B, et al. Outcomes of kidney trans-plantation in HIV-infected recipients[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(21): 2004-2014.
10
Owens CD,Stoessel K. Surgical site infection: epidemiology, mi-crobiology and prevention[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2008, 70(Supplement 2): 3-10.
11
Dua RS,Wajed SA,Winslet MC. Impact of HIV and AIDS on sur-gical practice[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2007, 89(4): 354-358.
12
Feng T,Feng XL,Jiang CH, et al. Sepsis risk factors associated with HIV-1 patients undergoing surgery[J]. Emerg Microbes In-fec, 2015: e59.
[1] 韩媛媛, 热孜亚·萨贝提, 冒智捷, 穆福娜依·艾尔肯, 陆晨, 桑晓红, 阿尔曼·木拉提, 张丽. 组合式血液净化治疗对脓毒症患者血清炎症因子水平和临床预后的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 272-278.
[2] 孟建标, 张庚, 焦燕娜. 脓毒症合并心功能障碍患者早期肠道微生态改变的探讨[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 279-285.
[3] 陈宇, 冯芳, 张露, 刘健. 基于生物信息学分析筛选脓毒症心肌病关键致病基因[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 286-291.
[4] 作者. 脓毒症与脓毒性休克[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 0-.
[5] 张晓燕, 肖东琼, 高沪, 陈琳, 唐发娟, 李熙鸿. 转录因子12过表达对脓毒症相关性脑病大鼠大脑皮质的保护作用及其机制[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 540-549.
[6] 魏徐, 张鸽, 伍金林. 新生儿脓毒症相关性凝血病的监测和治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 379-386.
[7] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[8] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[9] 窦上文, 邓欢, 刘邦锋, 岳高远志, 朱华财, 刘永达. 术前复查尿培养在预测微通道经皮肾镜取石术相关感染并发症中的作用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 361-366.
[10] 李伟, 卓剑, 黄川, 黄有攀. Lac、HO-1、sRAGE、CRP/ALB表达及脓毒症并发ARDS危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 514-516.
[11] 苗软昕, 乔晞. Toll样受体在脓毒症性急性肾损伤中的作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 210-214.
[12] 高超, 巢杰, 邱海波. T-bet:脓毒症免疫失衡中Th17细胞的新型调节分子[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 280-285.
[13] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
[14] 谭睿, 王晶, 於江泉, 郑瑞强. 脓毒症中高密度脂蛋白、载脂蛋白A-I和血清淀粉样蛋白A的作用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 749-753.
[15] 蔡荇, 郑瑞强. 肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症中的应用及研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 487-490.
阅读次数
全文


摘要