切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -107. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.02.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中不同补片固定方式的中远期疗效对比研究
周雪玲1, 练贤惠1, 刘健培1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-09 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘健培
  • 基金资助:
    教育部博士点基金(新教师类)资助项目(20130171120101)

Comparative study of mid- and long-term results following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia with different mesh fixed ways

Xueling Zhou1, Xianhui Lian1, Jianpei Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2017-02-09 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianpei Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jianpei, Email:
引用本文:

周雪玲, 练贤惠, 刘健培. 腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中不同补片固定方式的中远期疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 104-107.

Xueling Zhou, Xianhui Lian, Jianpei Liu. Comparative study of mid- and long-term results following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia with different mesh fixed ways[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 104-107.

目的

对比腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中使用3D免固定补片和钉合固定平片对中远期临床疗效的影响。

方法

收集2013年1月至2014年8月在中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科行腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的131例患者住院和随访资料,比较3D免固定补片组和钉合固定平片组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛和生活质量等数据。

结果

两组患者无中转开腹病例,随访期间均未见疝复发。3D补片组的手术时间比钉合固定平片组短(t=3.061,P=0.002),术后6个月和1年慢性疼痛发生率(χ2=4.943、5.035,P=0.026、0.025)以及术后6个月、1年和2年的异物感发生率(χ2=4.185、5.035、5.035,P=0.041、0.029、0.025)均比钉合固定平片组少,术后生活质量评分比钉合固定平片组高(t=2.633、2.088、2.000,P=0.009、0.039、0.048)。

结论

腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中使用3D免固定补片可缩短手术时间,减少术后疼痛,提升生活质量,是值得推广的疝修补手术方式。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of different mesh fixed ways in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective review of one hundred and thirty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia using 3D non-stapled mesh or stapled mesh between January 2013 and August 2014 was performed. Data were compared between two groups including operation time, postoperative pain and life quality.

Results

There was no turning to open operation and postoperative recurrence in both groups, while operation time was shorter in 3D mesh group (t=3.061, P=0.002) . Compared with stapled mesh group, patients in 3D mesh group reported a lower rate of chronic pain in 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (χ2=4.943, 5.035, P=0.026, 0.025) , and a lower rate of foreign body sensation (χ2=4.185, 5.035, 5.035, P=0.041, 0.029, 0.025) , but higher scores in quality of life in 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, after primary hernia repair (t=2.633, 2.088, 2.000, P=0.009, 0.039, 0.048) .

Conclusion

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair with 3D non-staple mesh for inguinal hernia is a feasible way to shorten operation time, decrease chronic pain rate and improve quality of life.

表1 两组初发疝患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组病例术后慢性疼痛发生率的对比[n(%)]
表3 两组病例术后异物感发生率的对比[n(%)]
表4 两组病例术后生活质量(QOL-35)的对比(±s
[1]
Butters M,Redecke J,Koninger J. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs[J]. Br J Surg, 2007, 94(5): 562-565.
[2]
Takata H,Matsutani T,Hagiwara N, et al. Assessment of the incidence of chronic pain and discomfort after primary inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Surg Res, 2016, 206(2): 391-397.
[3]
Donati M,Brancato G,Giglio A, et al. Incidence of pain after inguinal hernia repair in the elderly. A retrospective historical cohort evaluation of 18-years’ experience with a mesh & plug inguinal hernia repair method on about 3 000 patients[J]. BMC Surg, 2013, 13(Suppl 2): S19.
[4]
Grebic D,Tomasic AM,Valencic L, et al. The incidence and characteristics of chronic postoperative groin pain after inguinal hernia repair with different types of prolene mesh[J]. West Indian Med J, 2015, pii: wimj. 2014. 213.
[5]
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration.Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Br J Surg, 2000, 87(7): 860-867.
[6]
Miserez M,Peeters E,Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2): 151-163.
[7]
李英儒,赖东明,温润龙, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的比较[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2012, 6(5): 413-416.
[8]
McKernan JB,Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach[J]. Surg Endosc, 1993, 7(1): 26-28.
[9]
Dulucq JL,Wintringer P,Mahajna A. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3 100 hernia repairs over 15 years[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(3): 482-486.
[10]
Loos MJ,Roumen RM,Scheltinga MR. Chronic sequelae of common elective groin hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(2): 169-173.
[11]
Alfieri S,Amid PK,Campanelli G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3): 239-249.
[12]
Amid PK. Causes, prevention, and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy neuropathic inguinodynia: triple neurectomy with proximal end implantation[J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(4): 343-349.
[13]
Paajanen H,Ronka K,Laurema A. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three meshes in lichtenstein hernia repair: 2- and 5-year outcome of recurrences and chronic pain[J]. Int J Surg, 2013, 11(1): 81-84.
[14]
Stark E,Oestreich K,Wendl K, et al. Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(9): 878-881.
[15]
Amato G,Romano G,Agrusa A, et al. Biologic response of inguinal hernia prosthetics: a comparative study of conventional static meshes versus 3D dynamic implants[J]. Artif Organs, 2015, 39(1): E10-E23.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要