切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 108 -111. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.02.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后早期疼痛的疗效分析
侯泽辉1, 江志鹏1, 李英儒1, 周太成1, 马宁1, 甘文昌1, 余卓敏1, 陈双1,()   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科;广东省结直肠盆底疾病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 陈双

Clinical effect of local cooling on early postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair

Zehui Hou1, Zhipeng Jiang1, Yingru Li1, Taicheng Zhou1, Ning Ma1, Wenchang Gan1, Zhuomin Yu1, Shuang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2016-12-05 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuang Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Shuang, Email:
引用本文:

侯泽辉, 江志鹏, 李英儒, 周太成, 马宁, 甘文昌, 余卓敏, 陈双. 局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后早期疼痛的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 108-111.

Zehui Hou, Zhipeng Jiang, Yingru Li, Taicheng Zhou, Ning Ma, Wenchang Gan, Zhuomin Yu, Shuang Chen. Clinical effect of local cooling on early postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 108-111.

目的

评价局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后早期疼痛的疗效。

方法

选取2015年3月至2016年1月中山大学附属第六医院收治的单侧原发性腹股沟疝患者81例,随机分为冰敷组40例和对照组41例,手术均采用局麻下常规无张力疝修补术,对照组术后予常规治疗,冰敷组在常规治疗的基础上加用局部冰敷。观察两组术后疼痛VAS评分,镇痛药使用数量,术后切口炎症反应情况。

结果

术后冰敷组的疼痛评分及镇痛药的使用数量明显低于对照组,术后30 min至48 h的疼痛评分及镇痛药使用数量的差异有统计学意义(t=2.563、6.779、10.376、2.771、4.491、7.679, P=0.017、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001;χ2=4.767,P=0.029);两组术后的切口均顺利愈合,但冰敷组的切口炎症反应发生率(12.5%)低于对照组(31.7%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.588, P=0.032);冰敷30 min后皮温可降至(12.29±0.73)℃并稳定维持,开始获得较好的镇痛效果。

结论

局部冰敷是一种安全、有效地减少腹股沟疝术后早期疼痛的方法,简单易行,值得临床推广。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of local cooling on early postoperative pain after open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

Eighty-one patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia enrolled in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from March 2015 to January 2016 were randomly divided into cooling group with 40 cases and control group with 41 cases. All patients underwent conventional tension-free inguinal hernia repair by local anesthesia. The cooling group received conventional postoperative treatment and local cooling, while the control group received only conventional treatment. The following data were observed and compared between two groups: VAS degree of pain, the amount of analgesic drug and inflammatory reaction of incision after operation.

Results

The average VAS score and the amount of analgesic drug of cooling group was less than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (t=2.563, 6.779, 10.376, 2.771, 4.491, 7.679, P=0.017, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001; χ2=4.767, P=0.029). Incision of the two groups healed well, but the incidence of incision inflammation of cooling group was less than control group, with statistically significant difference (12.5% vs 31.7%, χ2=4.588, P=0.032). After 30 minutes’ cooling, the skin temperature could be reduced to (12.29±0.73)℃ and remained to be analgesic.

Conclusion

Local cooling is safe and effective to reduce the early postoperative pain after inguinal hernia surgery, which is easy to operate and deserves to be popularized in clinical work.

表1 冰敷组与对照组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组行无张力疝修补术的腹股沟疝患者手术情况
图1 冰敷组的"温度变化曲线"
表3 冰敷组和对照组术后VAS评分比较(±s
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组.《成人腹股沟疝、股疝治疗方案(修订稿)》[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2004, 19(2): 126.
[2]
Bay-Nielsen M,Perkins FM,Kehlet H. Danish Hernia Data Base: pain and functional impartment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study[J]. Ann Surg, 2001, 233(1): 1-7.
[3]
McHugh GA,Thomas GM. The management of pain following day-case surgery[J]. Anaesthesia, 2002, 57(3): 270-275.
[4]
Kullenberg B,Ylipaa S,Soderlund K, et al. Postoperative cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 86 patients[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(8): 1175-1179.
[5]
Hochberg J. A randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of two cold-therapy treatments following carpal tunnel release[J]. J Hand Ther, 2001, 14(3): 208-215.
[6]
Knobloch K,Kraemer R,Lichtenberg A, et al. Microcirculation of the ankle after Cryo/Cuff application in healthy volunteers[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2006, 27(3): 250-255.
[7]
Schaser KD,Stover JF,Melcher I, et al. Local cooling restores microcirculatory hemodynamics after closed soft-tissue trauma in rats[J]. J Trauma, 2006, 61(3): 642-649.
[8]
Akgun K,Korpinar MA,Kallan MT, et al. Temperature changes in superficial and deep tissue layers with respect to time of cold gel pack application in dogs[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2004, 45(4): 711-718.
[9]
张博,罗从风. 骨科相关软组织损伤局部冷疗[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2009, 30(5): 293-295.
[10]
Thorlacius H,Vollmar B,Westermann S, et al. Effects of local cooling on microvascular hemodynamics and leukocyte adhesion in the striated muscle of hamsters[J]. J Trauma, 1998, 45(4): 715-719.
[1] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 易颖煜, 朱亚琴. 口颌面疼痛的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 300-306.
[4] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[9] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[10] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[11] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要