切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05) : 314 -317. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.05.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

结肠全切除对比结肠次全切除对顽固性慢传输型便秘疗效观察
许文卿1,()   
  1. 1. 516000 广东省惠州市第一人民医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-25 出版日期:2017-10-01
  • 通信作者: 许文卿

Comparative study of total colectomy with subtotal colectomy for intractable slow transit constipation

Wenqing Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency, the First People's Hospital of Huizhou, Huizhou 516000, China
  • Received:2017-05-25 Published:2017-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenqing Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Wenqing, Email:
引用本文:

许文卿. 结肠全切除对比结肠次全切除对顽固性慢传输型便秘疗效观察[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(05): 314-317.

Wenqing Xu. Comparative study of total colectomy with subtotal colectomy for intractable slow transit constipation[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(05): 314-317.

目的

探讨结肠全切除对比结肠次全切除对顽固性慢传输型便秘(STC)临床疗效。

方法

选取2014年1月至2016年1月惠州市第一人民医院收治并确诊为STC患者78例,依据随机数字表法将其随机分为全切除组(39例,行结肠全切除、回直肠吻合术)和次全切除组(39例,行结肠次全切除、逆蠕动盲直肠吻合术),记录两组患者手术时间、术中出血量,以及术后住院时间、2周内止泻药使用比率、并发症情况和Wexner肛门失禁评分,并对患者随访12个月,随访内容包含Wexner便秘评分、顽固性腹泻率和患者满意度。

结果

两组患者术中出血量、手术时间和术后排气时间对比差异无统计学意义;全切除组术后住院时间、止泻药使用比率均高于次全切除组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.016,P=0.021;χ2=4.993,P=0.008)。两组患者术后Wexner便秘评分逐渐降低,术后12个月时全切除组评分明显低于次全切除组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.100,P=0.007);两组患者术后顽固性腹泻率对比差异无统计学意义,全切除组患者满意度高于次全切除组,便秘复发率低于次全切除组,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=3.175、4.905、3.884,P=0.227、0.027、0.019)。

结论

结肠全切除手术和结肠次切除手术在顽固性慢传输型便秘治疗中都有较好的疗效,结肠次全切除手术后患者短期内效果较好,而结肠全切除患者的长期效果较好。

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of total colectomy with subtotal colectomy for intractable slow transit constipation (STC).

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2016, seventy-eight cases of STC were diagnosed in the First People's Hospital of Huizhou City, and according to random number table method randomly divided into total resection group (39 cases underwent total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis) and subtotal resection group (39 cases underwent subtotal colectomy and antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy). Data of patients were recorded with operation time, bleeding volume during operation, and postoperative hospitalization time in 2 weeks, antidiarrheals use ratio, complications and Wexner incontinence score, and patients were followed up for 12 months for Wexner constipation score, intractable diarrhea rate and patient satisfaction.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding volume, exhaust time and operative time. Postoperative hospitalization time and antidiarrheal use ratios of the total resection group was higher than the subtotal resection group, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.016, P=0.021; χ2=4.993, P=0.008). Postoperative Wexner constipation score decreased gradually after 12 months, and total resection group were significantly lower than subtotal group, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.100, P=0.007). There was no significant difference for intractable diarrhea rate, while patients satisfaction and constipation recurrence is higher in total resection group than the subtotal resection group, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=3.175, 4.905, 3.884, P=0.227, 0.027, 0.019).

Conclusions

Total resection of the colon and secondary resection of the colon have good effect in the treatment of intractable STC. The short term effect is better for the total resection of the colon, and the long term effect for subtotal resection.

表1 两组顽固性慢性传输型便秘患者基本临床资料比较
表2 两组顽固性慢性传输型便秘患者围手术期情况比较
表3 两组顽固性慢性传输型便秘患者术后并发症情况[例(%),χ2检验]
表4 两组顽固性慢性传输型便秘患者术后Wexner便秘评分对比(t检验)
[1]
高峰,杨增强,徐明, 等. 慢传输型便秘结肠次全切除术后盲肠直肠吻合方式的探讨[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 4(2):37-40.
[2]
龚文敬,赵希忠,任叔阳, 等. 经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘10例报告[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(1):72-75.
[3]
Fan WC, Huang CC, Sung A, et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction and intraabdominal ileorectal anastomosis for slow-transit constipation (with video)[J]. J Visc Surg, 2016, 153(4):309-310.
[4]
蔺兵虎. 逆蠕动盲肠直肠吻合术与结肠全切除回直肠吻合术治疗重度顽固性慢传输型便秘的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2015, 16(4):275-277.
[5]
吴磊,钱群,江从庆. 结肠次全切除、逆蠕动盲肠直肠吻合术治疗慢传输型便秘[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2010, 18(4):282-283.
[6]
Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of faecal incontinence[J]. Dis colon Rectum, 1993, 36(1):77-97.
[7]
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, et al. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996, 39(5):681-685.
[8]
刘新光. 解读功能性肠病罗马Ⅲ诊断标准[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2006, 26(21):1691-1693.
[9]
Sun JW, Gu JN, Du P, et al. Comparison of two types of colectomy in treating slow transit constipation with or without melanosis coli[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(33):9736-9740.
[10]
蔺兵虎. 逆蠕动盲肠直肠吻合术与结肠全切除回直肠吻合术治疗重度顽固性慢传输型便秘的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2015,19(4):275-277.
[11]
Ghellal A, Trilling B, Izard G, et al. Permanent ileostomy as the last surgical option for severe slow-transit constipation[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2015, 19(6):373-374.
[12]
姚永良,杨珮,保红平. 腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘并发症的临床分析[J]. 云南医药, 2016, 11(3):293-295.
[13]
Marchesi F, Rapacchi C, Cecchini S, et al. Late surgical complications of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic caeco-rectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: a critical analysis[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2015, 87(7):31-36.
[14]
余思,吴小剑,兰平, 等. 两种术式治疗合并直肠前突的慢传输型便秘的效果比较[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2010, 4(3):232-236.
[15]
Monterrubio C, Pascual-Pasto G, Cano F, et al. SN-38-loaded nanofiber matrices for local control of pediatric solid tumors after subtotal resection surgery[J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 79(8):69-77.
[16]
谢尚奎,任东林,鲜振宇, 等. 全结肠切除联合全直肠保留治疗结肠慢传输型便秘[J]. 广东医学, 2015, 33(6):873-874.
[1] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 郑民华, 马君俊. 不断推进中国腹腔镜直肠癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 473-476.
[4] 常剑, 邱峰, 毛郁琪. 摄食抑制因子-1与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后肝转移的关系分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 502-505.
[5] 甄勇, 张超, 张尊庶, 孙弢. NOSES左半结肠癌根治术功能性端端吻合与Overlap吻合对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 69-72.
[6] 何吉鑫, 杨燕妮, 王继伟, 李建国, 谢铭. 肠道菌群及肠道代谢产物参与慢性便秘发生机制的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 495-499.
[7] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[8] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[9] 周启阳, 何宋兵, 胡优, 陈昕, 周雨迪, 周晓俊. 第四代达芬奇机器人单孔加一腹腔镜全结肠切除术治疗慢传输型便秘一例(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 348-352.
[10] 路继永, 王帅, 张成仁, 吴德望, 杨熊飞. 腹腔镜右半结肠切除应用现状[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 221-227.
[11] 张睿, 陈艳妮, 侯孝涛, 陈浩, 麻琦瑶, 倪敏. 老年出口梗阻型便秘患者肛门直肠测压特点分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 139-144.
[12] 杨程鹏, 金佳, 王明祥, 戴光耀. 直肠黏膜环切联合阴道后壁折叠治疗出口梗阻型便秘的效果观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 471-474.
[13] 许新意, 岳婧婧, 高玲, 曾禹沙, 李婧婧, 冯克, 薛雅红. 经会阴超声与MRI排粪造影诊断女性出口梗阻型便秘的临床价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 342-348.
[14] 郑秀丽, 倪敏. 功能性便秘患者的直肠肛门抑制反射特征分析100例[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 870-875.
[15] 沈彬艳, 金黑鹰, 张心怡, 杨怡雯, 王永通, 张春霞, 叶晓瑞. 超声排粪造影在盆底失弛缓便秘诊断中的价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 626-629.
阅读次数
全文


摘要