切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 174 -176. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.03.005

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

论著

腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术56例临床研究
伍万权1,()   
  1. 1. 232052 淮南,安徽省淮南新华医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-22 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 伍万权

Clinical study of laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer: a report of 56 cases

Wanquan Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Anhui Province Xinhua Hospital of Huainan City, Huainan 232052, China
  • Received:2017-12-22 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wanquan Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Wanquan, Email:
引用本文:

伍万权. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术56例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 174-176.

Wanquan Wu. Clinical study of laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer: a report of 56 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 174-176.

目的

从手术路径、手术技巧、造瘘及吻合等方面分享腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术技巧经验。

方法

回顾性分析安徽省淮南新华医院2015年1月到2016年9月成功开展的56例行腹腔镜直肠癌根治患者临床资料,结合手术体验探讨手术体会及技巧。

结果

56例患者手术及麻醉过程顺利,均采用标准腹腔镜直肠癌根治术,包括腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术(Miles)17例(30.36%);经腹直肠癌切除术(Dixon)35例(62.50%),其中6例行预防性末端回肠造口术;经腹直肠癌切除、近端造口、远端封闭手术(Hartmann)4例(7.14%)。腹腔镜手术时间为120~230(162±43)min,出血量为10~400(74±50.5)ml。术后病理:Ⅱ期19例,Ⅲ期35例,Ⅳ期2例。术后2例(3.57%)出现肠梗阻,保守治疗治愈,3例(5.36%)切口感染,1例(1.78%)肺部感染,予以相应处理后痊愈出院。随访12~34个月,未见复发病例。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术路径及技巧各异,在遵循肿瘤手术一般原则及操作熟练的情况下,具有安全有效、微创精细、精准等优势。

Objective

To share the experience of laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer from the aspects of surgical procedures, surgical techniques, fistulas and anastomosis.

Methods

From January 2015 to September 2016, the clinical data of fifty-six cases undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in Xinhua Hospital of Huainan City were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The laparoscopic radical resection and anesthesia process were smooth in the 56 patients. There were 17 cases (30.36%), 35 cases(62.50%), and 4 cases(7.14%) performed by Miles, Dixon and Hartmann operation, respectively, including 6 cases of prophylactic terminal ileostomy in the Dixon group. The laparoscopic operation time was 120-230 (162±43) min, the amount of bleeding was 10-400 (74±50.5) ml. Postoperative pathology showed 19 cases in stage Ⅱ, 35 in stage Ⅲ, and 2 in stage Ⅳ. Postoperative complications found 2 (3.57%) of intestinal obstruction, 3 (5.36%) of incision infection, and 1 (1.78%) of pulmonary infection. All cases were cured and discharged. No recurrence was found after 12-34 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

The path and skills of laparoscopic colorectal cancer is not exactly the same. Following the basic principles and skills of tumor surgery, laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery is safe, effective, minimally invasive, and precise.

[1]
Mckay GD, Morgan MJ, Wong SK, et al. Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 55(1): 42-50.
[2]
Mizrahi I, Mazeh H. Role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer: a review[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(17): 4900-4907.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠手术手术入路选择专家共识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(4): 415-419.
[4]
Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F, et al. Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(1): 89-97.
[5]
Zheng MH, Zhang S, Feng B. Complete mesocolic excision: Lessons from anatomy translating to better oncologic outcome[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2016, 8(3): 235-239.
[6]
Wang G. Comparative analysis and interpretation of NCCN, NICE and ESMO guidelines for colorectal cancer[J]. China Oncol, 2015, 25(11): 849-853.
[7]
孙琳婧,吴瑞青,杨拥军, 等. 降低后腹腔镜术中气腹压力对老年患者血管内皮细胞的影响研究[J]. 中外医疗, 2017, 36(26): 28-29.
[8]
崔宏帅. 腹腔镜Mile’s术后经腹膜外与经腹膜内造口疗效对比研究[D]. 重庆医科大学, 2016.
[9]
胡毕文,曹晨曦,沈桂鑫, 等. 直肠肛管恶性肿瘤腹会阴联合切除术中两种途径腹膜外乙状结肠造口的比较[J]. 浙江医学, 2016, 38(3):198-200.
[10]
Faerden AE, Naimy N, Wiik P, et al. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: difference in outcome for low and high rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 48(12): 2224-2231.
[11]
邵乐寨,孙吉冰,张怀华, 等. 腹腔镜低位保肛术治疗早期直肠癌的临床效果观察[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2016, 19(2): 138-140.
[12]
贝迪恺,李军,张苏展. 精确评估分层:结直肠癌外科的发展方向[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(3): 269-273.
[13]
黄新,申亚伟,郑晨, 等. 196例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术精准切除及保留盆腔神经的治疗体会[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(17): 2747-2750.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[12] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?