切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 260 -264. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.04.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

术前渐进性气腹在切口疝治疗中的应用
汤福鑫1, 陈双1,()   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科,广东省结直肠盆底疾病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-25 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 陈双

Application of preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum in treating complex incisional hernia repair

Fuxin Tang1, Shuang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2018-01-25 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuang Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Shuang, Email:
引用本文:

汤福鑫, 陈双. 术前渐进性气腹在切口疝治疗中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 260-264.

Fuxin Tang, Shuang Chen. Application of preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum in treating complex incisional hernia repair[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 260-264.

目的

分析术前渐进性气腹(PPP)在复杂切口疝治疗中的应用效果和安全性。

方法

采用回顾性横断面研究方法,收集2015年1月至2017年2月中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝和腹壁外科收治的21例采用PPP行切口疝修补术患者的临床资料,患者在气腹前后均行腹部CT检查,计算疝囊容积、腹腔容积。

结果

21例患者均完成气腹,平均气腹时间(16.6±1.8)d,平均注入的空气量(3.7±0.9)L;4例(19.0%)发生与PPP相关的并发症,包括1例皮下气肿和3例肩胛痛;气腹前后平均疝囊容积分别是(901.0±430.8)ml和(1 115.1±481.9)ml,腹腔容积分别是(6 741.9±1 746.9)ml和(8 962.3±2 272.9)ml,(疝囊容积/腹腔总容积)×100%分别是(12±5)%和(11±4)%,差异均有统计学意义(t=11.3、12.4、2.9,均P<0.01);气腹后疝囊容积与腹腔容积平均分别增加26.0%、33.7%,多数患者疝内容物自发性减少。21例患者均顺利完成手术,无一例发生肠管损伤,平均手术时间和术后住院天数分别为(180.1±50.6)min、(11.4±9.0)d,腹壁缺损均完全关闭;术后出现血清肿2例,呼吸困难1例,肺炎1例,均经对症治疗后好转,未出现腹腔高压、心肺功能衰竭等严重并发症。平均随访时间(13.0±8.0)个月,无一例疝复发。

结论

PPP应用于切口疝安全有效,允许疝内容物完全回纳腹腔。

Objective

To analyze the efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) prior to elective repair of the complex incisional hernia.

Methods

This retrospective study assessed twenty-one patients between January 2015 and February 2017 with complex incisional hernias. All patients underwent serial computed tomography of the abdomen with volume measurements of the peritoneal cavity and hernia sac before and after pneumoperitoneum.

Results

Twenty-one patients successfully completed the pneumoperitoneum. The mean overall duration of pneumoperitoneum was (16.6±1.8) days, the mean insufflated volume of air was (3.7±0.9) L; 4 patients (19.0%) suffered from pneumoperitoneum-related complications, consisting of one subcutaneous emphysema and three of scapular pain. Before and after PPP, the mean volume of the incisional hernia (VIH) was (901.0±430.8) ml, (1 115.1±481.9) ml, the mean volume of the abdominal cavity (VAbC) was (6 741.9±1 746.9) ml, (8 962.3±2 272.9) ml, VIH/(VIH+VAbC)×100% was (12±5)% and (11±4)%, the differences were statistically significant (t=11.3, 12.4, 2.9, all P<0.01). The mean gain in volume of the hernia sac was 214 ml (26.0%) and the abdominal cavity was 2 220 ml (33.7%) after PPP. Most patients showed spontaneous reduction of the hernia contents. The operations of all patients were successful, no bowel injury was found, the mean operative time and postoperative length of stay were (180.1±50.6) min, (11.4±9.0) d. Complete closure of the abdominal wall defect was performed in all patients. Postoperatively, there were 2 cases of seroma, 1 case of dyspnea, 1 case of pneumonia, all patients were better after symptomatic treatment. There were no patients experiencing abdominal hypertension and cardiorespiratory failure postoperatively. After a mean follow-up of (13.0±8.0) months, there were no hernia recurrences.

Conclusions

PPP is a useful adjunct in complex ventral hernia repair, allowing the reintroduction of herniated content into the abdominal cavity. Simultaneously, pneumoperitoneum has an acceptable overall morbidity.

图1 1例患者在气腹后第4天出现纵隔气肿(箭头示)
图2 1例巨大切口疝患者气腹前疝囊、腹腔容积情况 A示气腹前1例巨大右旁正中切口疝;B为冠状位CT片,疝囊容积为2 182.10 ml,腹腔容积为7 664.15 ml
图3 建立气腹通道过程 A为建立气腹所用材料:主要由深静脉导管组件构成;B为置管技巧;C为打气方法,使空气进入腹腔;D示导管位于腹腔,膈下游离气体证实成功建立气腹通道,腹部立位片反映患者气腹第1天后注入空气容量约300 ml;E示患者注气后状态,气腹管在正确位置;F为腹部立位片,显示气腹第16天后腹腔内大量游离气体,此例注入总空气量约6 500 ml;气体的高度约10 cm,代表膈肌升高的高度
图4 左侧胸腹壁皮下气肿(箭头示)
图5 同一椎骨水平CT图像 证实气腹后疝囊和腹腔容积的增加、疝囊容积相对的减少
图6 腹部CT显示患者气腹后疝内容物不同程度的回纳
图7 1例巨大切口疝患者手术前后腹部情况对比 A为术前腹壁缺损宽度约13 cm,B为手术后6个月照片
[1]
Hoers J, Lawong G, Klinge U, et al. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years[J]. Chirurg, 2002, 73(5): 474-480.
[2]
Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10-year rospective study of incidence and attitudes[J]. Br J Surg, 1985, 72(1): 70-71.
[3]
Bisgaard T, Kokotovic D, Helgstrand F. Recurrence and Mesh-related complications after incisional hernia repair—reply[J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(5): 537.
[4]
Eker HH, Hansson BM, Buunen M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2013, 148(3): 259-263.
[5]
Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, 3: CD007781.
[6]
Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, et al. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts' meeting[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2001, 386(1): 65-73.
[7]
Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Gorfine SR, et al. Rives-Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias: experience with 57 patients[J]. Hernia, 2002, 6(3): 120-123.
[8]
Raynor RW, Del Guercio LR. The place for pneumoperitoneum in the repair of massive hernia[J]. World J Surg, 1989, 13(5): 581-585.
[9]
Oprea V, Matei O, Gheorghescu D, et al. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP) as an adjunct for surgery of hernias with loss of domain[J]. Chirurgia, 2014, 109(5): 664-669.
[10]
Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Fuks D, et al. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum preparation (the Goni Moreno protocol) prior to large incisional hernia surgery: volumetric, respiratory and clinical impacts. A prospective study[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(1): 33-40.
[11]
Mavrodin CI, Pariza G, Ion D, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome-A major complication of large incisional hernia surgery[J]. Chirurgia, 2013, 108(3): 414-417.
[12]
Elstner KE, Jacombs ASW, Read JW, et al. Laparoscopic repair of complex ventral hernia facilitated by pre-operative chemical component relaxation using botulinum toxin A[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(2): 209-219.
[13]
中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(6): 487-489.
[14]
Bueno-Lledó J, Torregrosa Gallud A, Ballester N, et al. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum and botulinum toxin type A in patients with large incisional hernia[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(2): 233-243.
[15]
Dumont F, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, et al. Progressive pneumoperitoneum increases the length of abdominal muscles[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(2): 183-187.
[16]
Alyami M, Passot G, Voiglio E, et al. Feasibility of catheter placement under ultrasound guidance for progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum for large incisional hernia with loss of domain[J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39(12): 2878-2884.
[17]
Mcadory RS, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum for hernias with loss of domain[J]. Am Surg, 2009, 75(6): 504-508.
[18]
Quraishi AH, Borkar MM, Mastud MM, et al. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for repair of a large incisional hernia[J]. Updat Surg, 2013, 65(2): 165-168.
[19]
Renard Y, Lardière-Deguelte S, de Mestier L, et al. Management of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: A prospective series of patients prepared by progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum[J]. Surgery, 2016, 160(2): 426-435.
[20]
Mayagoitia JC, Suarez D, Arenas JC, et al. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneumin patients with abdominal-wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2006, 10(3): 213-217.
[21]
Willis S, Schumpelick V. Use of progressive pneumoperitoneum in the repair of giant hernias[J]. Hernia, 2000, 4(2): 105-111.
[1] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[9] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[10] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[11] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[12] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[13] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] 尹晖明, 韩洁, 谢承志, 邓浩, 胥宁, 李涛, 熊平. 经腹腔入路迟发性创伤性膈疝腹腔镜修补术的临床体会(附43例报道)[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 509-512.
[15] 柯文杰, 王勇. 成人腹壁硬纤维瘤切除术后腹壁组织修复重建的单中心临床研究经验[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-538.
阅读次数
全文


摘要