切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 418 -421. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.06.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同年龄化疗导致闭经乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗方案的选择
于亮1, 叶润仪1, 贺菲2, 孙诗瑶3, 林颖1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院甲状腺乳腺外科
    2. 518028 深圳市妇幼保健院乳腺外科
    3. 518035 深圳市第二人民医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-06 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 林颖
  • 基金资助:
    中山大学临床医学研究5010计划资助(2016007)

Optimal endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients in different age groups with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea

Liang Yu1, Runyi Ye1, Fei He2, Shiyao Sun3, Ying Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thyroid andBreast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Departmentof Breast Surgery, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen 518028, China
    3. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518035, China
  • Received:2018-08-06 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Ying, Email:
引用本文:

于亮, 叶润仪, 贺菲, 孙诗瑶, 林颖. 不同年龄化疗导致闭经乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗方案的选择[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 418-421.

Liang Yu, Runyi Ye, Fei He, Shiyao Sun, Ying Lin. Optimal endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients in different age groups with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 418-421.

目的

研究不同年龄乳腺癌患者发生化疗诱导闭经(CIA)和卵巢功能恢复(OFR)的情况,探讨不同年龄CIA乳腺癌患者内分泌药物的选择。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2015年12月于中山大学附属第一医院初次诊断并接受化疗、绝经前、有完整月经来潮情况和性激素检测随访数据的患者共123例。按年龄分为≤40岁组(35例)、>40~45岁组(34例)和>45岁组(54例),采用一般线性模型来分析各个年龄组的OFR率。

结果

≤40岁组患者中26例(74.29%)出现CIA,29例(82.86%)患者在2年内OFR;>40~45岁组及>45岁组全部出现CIA(100.00%),2年内分别有17例(50.00%)及3例(5.56%)患者OFR,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=24.42、54.97,均P<0.01)。在密切监测卵巢功能的情况下,对19例≥48岁、出现CIA、激素受体阳性高危乳腺癌患者使用芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)。使用AI时患者的中位年龄为51.08岁(48.00~54.25岁),从闭经到使用AI中位时间为9个月(2~21个月),中位随访32个月(8~68个月),无一例出现OFR。

结论

对于年龄≤45岁的CIA乳腺癌患者,由于OFR率高,内分泌药物应避免直接选用AI。对于≥51岁的CIA乳腺癌患者观察至少9个月,无OFR可开始使用AI,在使用AI时应定期监测卵巢功能。

Objective

To assess the incidence of ovarian function recovery (OFR) in women with breast cancer who were premenopausal at diagnosis and who underwent chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) during treatment, and to explore the optimal endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients in different age groups with CIA.

Methods

The data of one hundred and twenty-three women from January 2012 to December 2015 diagnosed with breast cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University was analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into ≤40 years (n=35), >40 years and ≤45 years (n=34) and >45 years (n=54) subgroups. A general linear model was used to assess incidences of OFR by agesubgroups.

Results

26 patients (74.29%) developed CIA in ≤40 years group. Of these, 29 patinets (82.86%) regained ovarian function within 2 years; 100% of patients in >40 to 45 years and >45 years groups developedCIA, and 17 (50.00%) and 3 (5.56%) of these regained ovarian function within 2 years, and this was significantly lower in those who were elder (χ2=24.42, 54.97, both P<0.01). In this retrospective study, 19 patients of median age 51.08 years (48.00 to 54.25 years) with hormone receptor positive high-risk breast cancer who had median 9 months (2 to 21 months) of CIA were treated with aromatase inhibitor (AI). None regained ovarian function with a median of 32 months (8 to 68 months) follow-up.

Conclusions

For breast cancer patients with CIA age ≤45, AI should be avoided due to the high risk of OFR. For breast cancer patients age ≥51 who have at least 9 months of CIA, AI can be chosen with monitoring ovarian function regularly.

表1 123例乳腺癌患者基本资料的比较[例(%)]
表2 123例患者化疗结束后不同时间点的OFR率
图1 CIA患者在化疗结束后2年内的卵巢功能恢复率
图2 19例CIA患者使用AI类药物后血清雌二醇(E2)值保持在绝经后水平
图3 19例CIA患者使用AI类药物后血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)值保持在绝经后水平
[1]
Geisler J, Lonning PE. Endocrine effects of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo: review of data and method limitations[J]. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2005, 95(1-5): 75-81.
[2]
Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. Invasive breast cancer version 1.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2016, 14(3): 324-354.
[3]
Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop+10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 97(4): 843-851.
[4]
Liem GS, Mo FK, Pang E, et al. Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea and menopause in young Chinese breast cancer patients: analysis on incidence, risk factors and serum hormone profiles[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e140842.
[5]
沈镇宙,宋三泰,张斌,等. 中国绝经前女性乳腺癌患者辅助治疗后绝经判断标准及芳香化酶临床应用共识(草案修正案)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2011, 21(5): 418-420.
[6]
Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(23): 3784-3796.
[7]
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472): 1687-1717.
[8]
Thurlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS, et al. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(26): 2747-2757.
[9]
Petrek JA, Naughton MJ, Case LD, et al. Incidence, time course, and determinants of menstrual bleeding after breast cancer treatment: a prospective study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(7): 1045-1051.
[10]
Mouridsen H, Giobbie-Hurder A, Goldhirsch A, et al. Letrozole therapy alone or in sequence with tamoxifen in women with breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(8): 766-776.
[11]
郁琦,周菁. 女性绝经相关时间点与症状谱在不同地区的差异[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2013, 42(8): 3-6.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[11] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 徐靖亭, 孔璐. PARP抑制剂治疗卵巢癌的耐药机制及应对策略[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 584-588.
阅读次数
全文


摘要