切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 274 -278. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.04.004

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

术前外周血炎性指标联合糖蛋白抗原19-9对结肠癌早期诊断及预后评估的价值
叶序卷1, 姚兰1, 刘世呈1, 戴红梅2,()   
  1. 1. 644000 宜宾市第二人民医院肿瘤五科
    2. 610014 成都市第三人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-29 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 戴红梅
  • 基金资助:
    2018年四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(18PJ126,18PJ112); 2016年四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(16PJ049)

Values of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio, platelet/lymphocyte count ratio combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of colon cancer

Xujuan Ye1, Lan Yao1, Shicheng Liu1, Hongmei Dai2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, the Second People’s Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin 644000, China
    2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610014, China
  • Received:2019-01-29 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongmei Dai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dai Hongmei, Email:
引用本文:

叶序卷, 姚兰, 刘世呈, 戴红梅. 术前外周血炎性指标联合糖蛋白抗原19-9对结肠癌早期诊断及预后评估的价值[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 274-278.

Xujuan Ye, Lan Yao, Shicheng Liu, Hongmei Dai. Values of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio, platelet/lymphocyte count ratio combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 274-278.

目的

探讨术前外周血炎性相关指标中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞计数比值(NLR)、血小板-淋巴细胞计数比值(PLR)联合糖蛋白抗原19-9(CA19-9)对结肠癌早期诊断及预后评估的应用价值。

方法

选取2015年5月至2017年3月宜宾市第二人民医院收治的189例结肠癌患者为结肠癌组,另选取同期健康体检志愿者72例为对照组。受试者均进行外周血常规检查并计算NLR及PLR比值,采用电化学发光法检测血清CA19-9水平,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析NLR、PLR、CA19-9对结肠癌的诊断效能。根据NLR、PLR、CA19-9以及联合检测结果分为阳性组与阴性组,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析不同检测指标对结肠癌患者预后评估的应用价值。

结果

与对照组相比,结肠癌组患者NLR、PLR比值及CA19-9水平均显著升高(P<0.05);ROC分析显示NLR曲线下面积(AUC)为0.787,敏感度为62.96%,特异度为79.17%,准确性为67.43%;PLR检测的AUC为0.776,敏感度为65.61%,特异度为76.39%,准确性为68.58%;CA19-9 AUC为0.735,敏感度为61.90%,特异度为84.72%,准确性为68.20%;三项联合检测敏感度为91.01%,特异度为97.22%,准确性为92.72%;Kaplan-Meier分析显示NLR、PLR、CA19-9及联合检测阳性组患者OS均分别显著低于各阴性组(P<0.05),仅联合检测风险比(HR)最高,HR=2.188(χ2=15.167,P<0.001,95%CI=1.310~3.656)。

结论

NLR、PLR联合CA19-9检测可提高临床早期诊断结肠癌的敏感度及准确性,且三项联合检测对结肠癌患者预后评估具有重要指导意义。

Objective

To investigate the value of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte count ratio (PLR) combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of colon cancer.

Methods

From May 2015 to March 2017, one hundred and eighty-nine patients with colon cancer admitted to the Second People’s Hospital of Yibin City were selected as colon cancer group, and 72 healthy volunteers were selected as control group. All the subjects underwent routine blood tests and NLR and PLR were calculated, serum CA19-9 level was detected by electrochemiluminescence, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of NLR, PLR and CA19-9 for colon cancer. According to the results of NLR, PLR, CA19-9 and combined detection, the patients were divided into positive group and negative group. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the application value of different detection indicators in prognosis evaluation of patients with colon cancer.

Results

Compared with the control group, the NLR, PLR and CA19-9 levels in colon cancer group were significantly higher (P<0.05). ROC analysis showed that the area under curue (AUC) of NLR was 0.787, the sensitivity 62.96%, the specificity 79.17%, and the accuracy 67.43%. The AUC of PLR was 0.776, the sensitivity 65.61%, the specificity 76.39%, and the accuracy 68.58%. The AUC of CA19-9 was 0.735, the sensitivity 61.90%, the specificity 84.72%, and the accuracy 68.20%. The sensitivity of the three combined test was 91.01%, the specificity was 97.22%, the accuracy was 92.72%; the combined test was significantly higher than single tests (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) of NLR, PLR, CA19-9 and the combined tests positive group were significantly lower than those of the negative group (P<0.05), while the combined HR value was the highest, which was 2.188 (χ2=15.167, P<0.001, 95%CI=1.310-3.656).

Conclusion

NLR and PLR combined with CA19-9 test can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of early diagnosis of colon cancer, and the three combined tests have important guiding significance for prognosis evaluation of colon cancer patients.

表1 两组NLR、PLR与CA19-9水平比较(±s
表2 联合检测与单项检测对结肠癌的诊断效能分析
图1 NLR、PLR、CA19-9对结肠癌的诊断效能分析
图2 NLR对结肠癌患者预后评估价值分析
图3 PLR对结肠癌患者预后评估价值分析
图4 CA19-9对结肠癌患者预后评估价值分析
图5 联合检测对结肠癌患者预后评估价值分析
[1]
Jaganathan SK, Vellayappan MV, Narasimhan G, et al. Chemopreventive effect of apple and berry fruits against colon cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(45): 17029-17036.
[2]
Bower JE. Cancer-related fatigue-mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2014, 11(10): 597-609.
[3]
Shalapour S, Lin XJ, Bastian IN, et al. Inflammation-induced IgA+ cells dismantle anti-liver cancer immunity[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7680): 340-345.
[4]
Chen N, Liu S, Huang L, et al. Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a meta-analysis[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(34): 57460-57469.
[5]
苟维杰,刘时彦. 血清VEGF、CA19-9以及OPN水平检测对大肠癌的临床诊断和手术疗效价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2015, 36(6): 105-108.
[6]
邱绪文,王祖斌. 血清CEA、CA199、CA724、CA242与结直肠癌关系的临床研究[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2016, 19(4): 326-327.
[7]
朱琼媛,周林华,李丽莉, 等. 血清肿瘤标志物在结肠癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(1): 125-127.
[8]
Minkov P, Gulubova M, Chilingirov P, et al. The position of neutrophils-to-lymphocytes and lymphocytes-to-platelets ratio as predictive markers of progression and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2018, 6(8): 1382-1386.
[9]
Minami S, Ihara S, Komuta K. Pretreatment lymphocyte to monocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for advanced pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Med Res, 2018, 10(8): 657-664.
[10]
孙洁,孟祥军. 检测血清CA19-9和CA72-4在胰腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 江苏医药, 2015, 41(8): 892-894.
[11]
陈志奇,刘朔婕,陈波. 外周血NLR与PLR对原发性胃癌患者生存状况的评估价值[J]. 中国生化药物杂志, 2015, 35(9): 103-105.
[12]
赵忠治,王金淼,魏颖, 等. 术前外周血NLR与PLR对胃癌预后的评估价值[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2018, 24(1): 50-54.
[13]
Manson J, Cole E, De'Ath HD, et al. Early changes within the lymphocyte population are associated with the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in trauma patients[J]. Cirt Care, 2016, 20(1): 176-186.
[14]
唐承璐,刘慧敏,吕小红. 血清YKL-40、CEA、CA72-4联合检测对结肠癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2015, 19(4): 645-646.
[15]
翟润,孙万日,郭胜利. 血常规联合血清CA19-9、AFP水平检测对原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2017, 16(6): 792-794.
[16]
范润萍,徐笑红. NLR、LDH结合几种常见肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的价值[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2017, 19(6): 895-898.
[17]
Kim JH, Lee JY, Kim HK, et al. Prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ colorectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(3): 505-515.
[18]
陈洛海,张雨,陈旻湖, 等. 肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原、甲胎蛋白、糖类抗原125和糖类抗原19-9在胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤中的升高情况及其对预后评估的价值[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(9): 1002-1008.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要