切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 279 -282. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.04.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

超高龄胆胰壶腹周围疾病行治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影的临床特征分析
岳瀚1, 胡聪1, 张少华1, 李伟男1, 李敬东1,()   
  1. 1. 637000 南充,川北医学院附属医院肝胆一科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-15 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 李敬东
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81370531); 四川省教育厅科研基金项目(16TD0025)

Clinical characteristics of ultra-elderly patients with biliary pancreatic periampullary disease treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Han Yue1, Cong Hu1, Shaohua Zhang1, Weinan Li1, Jingdong Li1,()   

  1. 1. The First Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Received:2019-04-15 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jingdong Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Jingdong, Email:
引用本文:

岳瀚, 胡聪, 张少华, 李伟男, 李敬东. 超高龄胆胰壶腹周围疾病行治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影的临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 279-282.

Han Yue, Cong Hu, Shaohua Zhang, Weinan Li, Jingdong Li. Clinical characteristics of ultra-elderly patients with biliary pancreatic periampullary disease treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 279-282.

目的

探讨超高龄胆胰壶腹周围病变行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗的可行性及患者的临床特征。

方法

回顾性分析2014年5月至2018年5月川北医学院附属医院收治的307例行ERCP治疗的患者临床资料。根据患者年龄分为超高龄组(≥80岁)和非超高龄组(<80岁),探讨两组患者的临床特征。

结果

92例超高龄组患者年龄(85.29±7.32)岁,215例非超高龄组患者年龄(57.81±14.26)岁。超高龄组患者原发病以壶腹部癌为主(P<0.01),ASA Ⅲ、Ⅳ级患者以及合并高血压、冠心病、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、十二指肠乳头旁憩室的比例明显高于非超高龄组(P<0.05)。超高龄组支架植入指征为胆管恶性狭窄以及采取支架植入或更换的患者比例明显更高(P=0.023、<0.001),而胆总管结石内镜取石比例更低(P=0.005),术后出血的发生率明显升高(P=0.021)。单因素分析显示原发疾病为壶腹部癌(P=0.044),合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室(P<0.001)、高血压(P=0.022)及冠心病(P=0.012),内镜下乳头括约肌切开术进行十二指肠乳头处理(P=0.012)为ERCP术后出血的危险因素。

结论

超高龄胆胰壶腹周围病变患者恶性疾病患病率高、合并疾病多,但并非治疗性ERCP术的绝对禁忌证,临床需防范术后出血的风险。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics of ultra-elderly patients with biliary pancreatic periampullary disease treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Methods

The clinical data of three hundred and seven patients with ERCP treated in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were analyzed retrospectively. According to the age, the patients were divided into the ultra-elderly group (aged over 80 years) and the control group (aged under 80 years), and the clinical characteristics were explored.

Results

The average age of 92 patients in the ultra-elderly group was (85.29±7.32) years, and that of 215 patients in the control group was (57.81±14.26) years. The primary disease of the ultra-elderly group was ampullary cancer (P<0.01). The proportions of ASA grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and duodenal diverticulum in the ultra-elderly group were significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of patients with malignant biliary stricture and stent implantation or replacement in the ultra-elderly group was significantly higher (P=0.023, <0.001), while the proportion of patients with choledocholithiasis was lower (P=0.005), and the incidence of postoperative bleeding was significantly higher (P=0.021). Univariate analysis showed that malignant obstructive jaundice as the primary disease (P=0.044), accompanied by duodenal diverticulum (P<0.001), hypertension (P=0.022) and coronary heart disease (P=0.012), endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment of duodenal papillae (P=0.012) were risk factors for postoperative bleeding after ERCP.

Conclusions

Periampullary malignant diseases of gallbladder, pancreas and ampulla have a high incidence in the ultra-elderly patients with many complications, but they are not absolute contraindication of therapeutic ERCP. The risk of bleeding after operation should be prevented clinically.

表1 两组胆胰壶腹周围病变患者的临床特征比较[例(%)]
表2 两组胆胰壶腹周围病变患者的手术方式[例(%)]
表3 两组胆胰壶腹周围病变患者的术后并发症情况[例(%)]
表4 超高龄胆胰壶腹周围病变患者的出血危险因素亚组分析[例(%)]
[1]
Maydeo A, Patil GK. ERCP: does patient position count?[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2018, 6(11): E1302-E1303.
[2]
Han SJ, Lee TH, Park SH, et al. Efficacy of midazolam-versus propofol-based sedations by non-anesthesiologists during therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients aged over 80 years[J]. Dig Endosc, 2017, 29(3): 369-376.
[3]
Platt TE, Smith K, Sinha S, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; a preferential pathway for elderly patients[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2018, 30: 13-17.
[4]
Park CS, Jeong HS, Kim KB, et al. Urgent ERCP for acute cholangitis reduces mortality and hospital stay in elderly and very elderly patients[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2016, 15(6): 619-625.
[5]
Garcia CJ, Lopez OA, Islam S, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly[J]. Am J Med Sci, 2016, 351(1): 84-90.
[6]
Inatomi O, Imai T, Fujimoto T, et al. Dexmedetomidine is safe and reduces the additional dose of midazolam for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2018, 18(1): 166.
[7]
Sousa M, Pinho R, Proença L, et al. Choledocholithiasis in elderly patients with gallbladder in situ - is ERCP sufficient?[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2018, 53(10-11): 1388-1392.
[8]
Brown NG, Camilo J, Nordstrom E, et al. Advanced ERCP techniques for the extraction of complex biliary stones: a single referral center's 12-year experience[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2018, 53(5): 626-631.
[9]
Korpela T, Cárdenas-Jaén K, Archibugi L, et al. Chronic use of statins and risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (STARK): Study protocol for an international multicenter prospective cohort study[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2018, 50(12): 1362-1365.
[10]
Cao J, Peng C, Ding X, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP cholecystitis: a single-center retrospective study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2018, 18(1): 128.
[11]
梅永,贾继虎,曾鹏飞, 等. 治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后十二指肠乳头出血的客观危险因素分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(9): 6-10.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[6] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[7] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[12] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[13] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[14] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[15] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要