切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 480 -484. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.06.013

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

MRI图像融合技术在肛瘘评估中的初步应用
李新文1, 王猛2, 蔡华崧2, 沈冰奇2,()   
  1. 1. 518067 深圳市南山区妇幼保健院放射科
    2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院医学影像科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 沈冰奇

A pilot study of magnetic resonance image fusion technology in the evaluation of anal fistula

Xinwen Li1, Meng Wang2, Huasong Cai2, Bingqi Shen2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518067, China
    2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2018-12-05 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Bingqi Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Bingqi, Email:
引用本文:

李新文, 王猛, 蔡华崧, 沈冰奇. MRI图像融合技术在肛瘘评估中的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 480-484.

Xinwen Li, Meng Wang, Huasong Cai, Bingqi Shen. A pilot study of magnetic resonance image fusion technology in the evaluation of anal fistula[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 480-484.

目的

采用图像融合技术获得T2WI与T2WI-FS的融合图像,评估其在肛瘘及肛周结构显示中的优势。

方法

2016年6月至2018年6月,前瞻性选择中山大学附属第一医院29例肛瘘患者进行肛管磁共振(MR)检查,采用图像融合技术获取T2WI与T2WI-FS的融合图像T2WI-Fusion,利用Fisher score算法计算瘘管及肛门括约肌的组织间分辨力Fisher值、脂肪与肛门括约肌间的Fisher值,评估融合图像中瘘管及肛周结构的显示情况。采用改进的双刺激连续质量量表(DSCQS)对T2WI-FS、T2WI、增强3D-VIBE和T2WI-Fusion序列图像进行主观图像质量评价。

结果

29例患者均成功获得T2WI与T2WI-FS的融合图像T2WI-Fusion。T2WI-Fusion、T2WI瘘管与括约肌间Fisher均值分别为6.46、3.31,T2WI-Fusion图像对瘘管的显示优于T2WI序列图像(P<0.001)。T2WI-Fusion、T2WI-FS脂肪与括约肌间Fisher均值分别为10.61、2.45,T2WI-Fusion图像对括约肌的显示优于T2WI-FS序列图像(P<0.001)。T2WI-Fusion对瘘管与括约肌的图像质量评价总评分均高于T2WI-FS、T2WI、增强3D-VIBE序列(P<0.001)。

结论

MRI图像融合技术同时具备T2WI及T2WI-FS的优势,无需增加扫描序列及扫描时间,且操作简单,花费时间短,显著提高病变及肛周解剖结构的对比度和图像质量。

Objective

To get the fusion image of T2WI and T2WI-FS sequence by applying the image fusion technology, and evaluate the advantages in anal fistulas and surrounding structures.

Methods

From June 2016 to June 2018, twenty-nine patients with anal fistula were collected prospectively in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. All the patients received anal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. T2WI and T2WI-FS images were used to generate fusion images (T2WI-Fusion). The discriminability of fistula, perianal sphincter, and perianal fat in T2WI, T2WI-FS, and T2WI-Fusion images was quantified with Fisher’s scoring algorithm. For subjective visual image assessment by researchers, five-point scale scores were determined using a modified double-stimulus continuous quality-scale (DSCQS) test to evaluate T2WI-FS, T2WI, enhanced axial 3D-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE), and T2WI-Fusion sequence images.

Results

Mean Fisher scores for fistulas vs sphincters obtained from T2WI-Fusion images (value=6.46) were significantly higher than those from T2WI images (value=3.31) (P<0.001). Mean Fisher scores for sphincters vs fat from T2WI-Fusion images (value=10.61) were significantly higher than those from T2WI-FS images (value=2.45) (P<0.001). T2WI-Fusion images showed better whole anal fistula and sphincter discriminability than that of T2WI-FS, T2WI and enhanced 3D-VIBE images (P<0.001).

Conclusions

MRI fusion technology combines the advantages of the T2WI and T2WI-FS images without increasing scan sequence and scan time. This technology is easy to operate and timesaving, and can significantly increase the anal fistula and sphincter discriminability and improve the imaging quality.

图1 基于像素的MRI图像融合 A为T2WI;B为T2WI-FS;C为T2WI-Fusion;A和B被分为无数像素单元,两者像素进行灰度值叠加,将所得灰度值之和进行图像重建即可得到融合图像
图2 Fisher值测定 对三种序列图像上瘘管、括约肌、脂肪的信号均值测量;A为T2WI;B为T2WI-FS;C为T2WI-Fusion
图3 MR图像融合对肛瘘及肛周结构的显示 A、B、C均为同一患者;A为T2WI;B为T2WI-FS,肛周解剖结构显示模糊;C为T2WI-Fusion,瘘管的显示相对A明显,且瘘管周边的纤维显示更明显;B和C均可见两个瘘管(箭头所示);D、E、F为同一患者,D为T2WI,瘘管显示不明显;E为T2WI-FS,可见一高信号瘘管影,但肛周解剖结构难辨;F为T2WI-Fusion,瘘管显示清楚,瘘位于内外括约肌之间
表1 T2WI-Fusion序列与T2WI、T2WI-FS序列的组织分辨力Fisher值
表2 MR评估肛瘘不同序列图像质量的DSCQS主观量表评分
[1]
傅传刚, 陆建平, 李卫萍, 等. 盆底与肛管直肠疾病影像学图谱[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2010: 59-67.
[2]
de Miguel Criado J, del SLG, Rivas PF, et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features[J]. Radiographics, 2012, 32(1): 175-194.
[3]
盛蕾. MR不同序列成像在肛周脓肿及肛瘘的诊断和分型中的应用[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2011.
[4]
Misaki M, Savitz J, Zotev V, et al. Contrast enhancement by combining T1- and T2-weighted structural brain MR Images[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 74(6): 1609-1620.
[5]
Miao J, Huang F, Narayan S, et al. A new perceptual difference model for diagnostically relevant quantitative image quality evaluation: A preliminary study[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 31(4): 596-603.
[6]
Ziech ML, Lavini C, Bipat S, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in determining disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn disease: A pilot study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2013, 200(2): W170-W177.
[7]
胡道予, 王承缘. MR不同序列成像诊断肛瘘的研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2004, 38(1): 66-69.
[8]
杨艳春, 李娇, 王阳萍. 图像融合质量评价方法研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2018, 12(7): 1021-1035.
[9]
Yoshizako T, Kitagaki H. A pictorial review of the impact of adding diffusion-weighted MR imaging to other MR sequences for assessment of anal fistulae[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2013, 31(6): 371-376.
[10]
Yoshizako T, Wada A, Takahara T, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for evaluating perianal fistula activity: feasibility study[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(9): 2049-2053.
[11]
李美芹, 张现坡, 孙新海, 等. DWI联合常规MR扫描对肛瘘的诊断价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2011, 26(2): 213-215.
[12]
余留森, 贾小强, 余海霞, 等. HDe不同扫描序列对肛瘘的诊断的比较研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2012, 10(2): 101-103.
[13]
冷晓明, 盖荣荣, 姜胜攀, 等. 3.0T磁共振LAVA-FLEX动态增强扫描序列对肛瘘诊断价值的研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2015, 13(6): 80-83.
[14]
Loeffelbein DJ, Souvatzoglou M, Wankerl V, et al. Diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2014, 14: 846.
[15]
Peach MS, Trifiletti DM, Libby B. Systematic review of focal prostate brachytherapy and the future implementation of image-guided prostate HDR brachytherapy using MR-ultrasound fusion[J]. Prostate Cancer, 2016, 2016: 4754031.
[16]
Barnaure I, Pollak P, Momjian S, et al. Evaluation of electrode position in deep brain stimulation by image fusion (MRI and CT)[J]. Neuroradiology, 2015, 57(9): 903-908.
[17]
杨星, 张林, 李丽琴, 等. PET与CT、MRI图像融合在肿瘤诊断中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2006, 4(2): 57-59.
[1] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[2] 谢峰, 伍玉晗, 赵胜, 杨小红, 王玉波, 石珍, 范建华, 章敏. 产前超声和MRI诊断胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形的联合应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[5] 吴少敏, 张世豪, 刘炳光, 李婵, 尹嘉敏, 郑昌业, 黄素然. 胎儿巨大蛛网膜囊肿并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[6] 王莉, 曹蕾, 王亚丹, 张伟. Krabbe病1例临床分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 339-345.
[7] 陈海香, 王元银, 蒋盼. 冠突过长患者的临床表现及磁共振影像学分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 169-174.
[8] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[9] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[10] 臧书芹, 陈巧玲, 江思源, 朱晓明, 沈浮, 王颢, 张卫, 邵成伟. 基于直肠高分辨MRI的直肠侧系膜分析及其临床价值的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 312-320.
[11] 吴浩凡, 刘元豪, 张锋敏, 张现中, 朱金浩, 黄嘉莹, 刘忠臣, 丁良福, 庄成乐. 基于术前MRI的盆底解剖参数对超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 209-216.
[12] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[13] 姜超, 夏旭东, 王功夏, 何向宇, 王海彬, 李媛. 磁共振DWI及其ADC对乳腺导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 234-243.
[14] 欧阳川, 朱巧珍, 欧阳林. 腰椎间盘退变的生物代谢特征及评价技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 206-211.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要