切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 332 -335. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.05.004

论著

加速康复外科模式在造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术的应用
于洪燕1, 王凤江1, 马宁1, 周太成1,()   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院胃肠、疝与腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-19 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 周太成

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery mode in Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia

Hongyan Yu1, Fengjiang Wang1, Ning Ma1, Taicheng Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2022-07-19 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Taicheng Zhou
引用本文:

于洪燕, 王凤江, 马宁, 周太成. 加速康复外科模式在造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 332-335.

Hongyan Yu, Fengjiang Wang, Ning Ma, Taicheng Zhou. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery mode in Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 332-335.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)模式在造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补围手术期的应用,优化造口旁疝管理方式及流程。

方法

采用时间分组法,选择中山大学附属第六医院收治的腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术患者46例,其中2021年1月至12月收治的25例患者为ERAS模式组,采用ERAS理念指导下的围手术期管理;2020年1月至12月收治的21例患者为对照组,采用传统围手术期管理。比较两组患者的一般资料和术后下床时间、进食时间、肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、尿管留置时间、疼痛分级、相关并发症的发生率等,评价ERAS模式的管理效果。

结果

两组患者性别、年龄、体质指数、疝分型比较差异均无统计学意义。ERAS模式组患者术后下床活动时间[(2.8±0.70)d vs(3.4±1.16)d,P=0.036]、进食时间[(1.7±0.55)d vs(3.0±1.56)d,P<0.001]、术后住院时间[(5.8±2.15)d vs(8.5±5.74)d,P=0.033]、造口排气时间[(2.2±0.65)d vs(3.0±1.56)d,P=0.018],均显著少于对照组(P<0.05),切口疼痛程度明显更轻(χ2=19.510,P<0.001)。ERAS模式组术后出现恶心呕吐1例(4.0%),对照组2例(9.5%),两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.024,P=0.876)。

结论

ERAS模式在造口旁疝Sugarbaker术围手术期管理中的应用,使得患者整体的康复进程得以加快,没有明显增加并发症发生率,值得推广。

Objective

To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia, and to optimize the management mode and process of parastomal hernia.

Methods

From January 2021 to December 2021, 25 patients with parastomal hernia undergoing laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University were recruited as the ERAS group using the time grouping method. Other group of 21 patients from Januray 2020 to December 2020 were recruited as the control group. Patients in the control group received traditional perioperative management and follow-up. Patients in the ERAS group implemented ERAS concept guidance. The general condition, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, hospitalization time, pain score, incidence of related complications and other indicators were compared between the two groups, and the effect was evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and hernia classification between the two groups. Compared with the control group, ERAS group was associated with earlier mobilization[(2.8±0.70) d vs (3.4±1.16) d, P=0.036], shorter oral feeding[(1.7±0.55) d vs (3.0±1.56) d, P<0.001], shorter hospital stay [(5.8±2.15) d vs (8.5±5.74) d, P=0.033], less exhaust time [(2.2±0.65) d vs (3.0±1.56) d, P=0.018], lower pain score at the time 1-3 d after surgery (χ2=19.510, P<0.001). While the postoperative complication rate of ERAS group was 4.0% (1/25), and the control group was 9.5% (2/21), which had no statistic difference (χ2=0.024, P=0.876).

Conclusion

The application of ERAS concept in perioperative management of parastomal hernia Sugarbaker can speed up the overall recovery process of patients, without increasing the incidence of complications, and it is worth popularizing.

表1 两组造口旁疝患者的一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期处理流程
表3 两组造口旁疝患者术后恢复情况比较(d, ±s)
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 1-20.
[2]
Sun YM, Wang Y, Mao YX, et al. The safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2020, 2020: 7401276.
[3]
马宁,于洪燕,汤福鑫, 等. 加速康复外科模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 291-295.
[4]
Dutta R, Xu R, Cui T, et al. Safety and economics of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in pelvic reconstructive surgery[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022, 33(7): 1875-1880.
[5]
Wang C, Feng H, Zhu X, et al. Comparative effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery program combined with single-incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 768299.
[6]
Reuter S, Woelber L, Trepte CC, et al. The impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways with regard to perioperative outcome in patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 306(1): 199-207.
[7]
Ni H, Li P, Meng Z, et al. Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: A cohort study[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(24): 1792.
[8]
佟贵繁,王峰,杜瑞, 等. 造口旁疝的外科治疗现状及展望[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 115-118.
[9]
Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(1): 1-6.
[10]
冯乐. 加速康复外科理念对胃癌合并2型糖尿病患者术后应激及血糖的影响[D]. 镇江:江苏大学, 2021.
[11]
Alazawi W, Pirmadjid N, Lahiri R, et al. Inflammatory and immune responses to surgery and their clinical impact[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(1): 73-80.
[12]
Martin L, Gillis C, Ljungqvist O. Preoperative nutrition care in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs: are we missing an opportunity?[J]. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2021, 24(5): 453-463.
[1] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[2] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[3] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[4] 许桂祥, 吴海华, 赵鸿志, 徐丽, 胡晓萍, 周世龙, 武永明, 彭新刚. 后鞘前入路腹腔镜视野下腹股沟区脂肪归属的解剖要点及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-281.
[5] 成紫琳, 戴明, 李建华, 马靓. 加速康复外科理念在儿童腹股沟疝围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[6] 朱俊佳, 孙琦, 徐文龙, 陆天宇, 冯强, 储涛, 邢春根, 高春冬, 俞一峰, 赵振国. 永久性结肠造口预防性补片置入对预防造口旁疝价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 336-342.
[7] 王招荐, 曹桢, 郭小双, 靳小雷, 刘子文. 加速康复外科理念应用于腹壁重建手术的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 343-350.
[8] 许熠, 邵翔宇, 李俊生. 膀胱切除术后造口旁疝的治疗[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 262-265.
[9] 高旭, 李若凡, 孙立新, 刘佐军, 田广健. Miles手术中预置腹膜前补片预防造口旁疝的效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 266-272.
[10] 刘化胜, 郑龙波, 秦琛, 王伟芹, 郑学风, 马金龙, 马正, 王洪霞, 刘磊, 胡继霖. 基于影像学指标构建永久性乙状结肠造口旁疝发病风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 75-82.
[11] 贾雪敏, 刘海元. 加速康复外科在卵巢囊肿患者围术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 36-38.
[12] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[13] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[14] 李凯, 朱志, 周海涛, 王俊, 杨野, 赵鑫, 谷金蓉, 智冬梅, 王世洋, 高梓茗, 张鑫炜, 赵睿涵, 王锡山, 王振宁. 经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在结直肠癌日间手术中的应用探索[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 63-67.
[15] 马建惠, 韩琦, 李韶玲. 加速康复外科护理路径+量化评估对腹腔镜胆囊切除术高龄患者手术室护理满意度的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 53-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要