切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 336 -340. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.05.005

论著

机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析
杨媛媛1, 黄鹤光1,(), 陈燕昌1, 陆逢春1, 林贤超1, 林荣贵1, 王丛菲1   
  1. 1. 350001 福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院基本外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-18 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 黄鹤光
  • 基金资助:
    福建省微创医学中心与普通外科国家临床重点专科(闽卫医政〔2021〕76号)

Clinical analysis of 18 cases with parastomal hernia treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery

Yuanyuan Yang1, Heguang Huang1,(), Yanchang Chen1, Fengchun Lu1, Xianchao Lin1, Ronggui Lin1, Congfei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2022-07-18 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Heguang Huang
引用本文:

杨媛媛, 黄鹤光, 陈燕昌, 陆逢春, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 王丛菲. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.

Yuanyuan Yang, Heguang Huang, Yanchang Chen, Fengchun Lu, Xianchao Lin, Ronggui Lin, Congfei Wang. Clinical analysis of 18 cases with parastomal hernia treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人和腹腔镜微创手术在造口旁疝治疗中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析2018年4月至2022年4月在福建医科大学附属协和医院使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术的18例患者资料。记录并比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、恢复进食时间、术后切口感染、麻痹性肠梗阻、引流管拔除时间、住院天数等,远期随访指标包括复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。

结果

18例均顺利完成造口旁疝无张力修补术,合并行造口重建术4例(22.2%)。Sugarbaker法修补13例(72.2%),其中使用达芬奇机器人系统2例,使用腹腔镜11例;Keyhole法修补5例(27.7%),其中使用达芬奇机器人系统1例,使用腹腔镜4例。手术时间191~406 min,平均(276.8±71.3)min。术中出血量20~100 ml,平均(29.3±22.2)ml。术后第2天恢复流质饮食,第3天进食半流质;放置引流管病例,术后5~7 d拔除引流管;常规腹带束缚3~6个月。术后住院时间3~19 d,平均(8.2±4.7)d。术后复发1例(5.6%),切口感染1例(5.6%),麻痹性肠梗阻3例(16.7%),肺部感染6例(33.3%),切口感染及麻痹性肠梗阻病例均经过非手术治疗后痊愈出院。随访期间均未出现复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。

结论

使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜进行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术均安全可行,围手术期并发症少,术后恢复快,疗效确切。

Objective

To explore the application of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery in parastomal hernia repair.

Methods

The data of 18 patients who underwent parastomal hernia tension-free repair using robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery from April 2018 to April 2022 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, recovery time of eating, postoperative incision infection, paralytic intestinal obstruction, drainage tube extraction time, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up indicators including recurrence, patch infection, and chronic pain were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

Tension-free repair of parastomal hernia was successfully completed in 18 cases, and 4 cases (22.2%) underwent stoma reconstruction. Sugarbaker method was performed in 13 cases (72.2%), of which 2 cases used robotic surgery and 11 cases used laparoscopic surgery. Keyhole method was performed in 5 cases (27.7%), of which 1 case used robotic surgery and 4 cases used laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 191-406 min, with an average of (276.8±71.3) minutes. Intraoperative blood loss was 20-100 ml, with an average of (29.3±22.2) ml. Liquid diet was resumed on the second day after operation, and semi-liquid diet was taken on the third day. The drainage tube was placed and removed 5-7 days after the operation. The routine abdominal girdle was restrained for 3-6 months. The postoperative hospital stay was 3-19 days, with an average of (8.2±4.7) days. Postoperative recurrence occurred in 1 case (5.6%), incision infection in 1 case (5.6%), paralytic intestinal obstruction in 3 cases (16.7%), pulmonary infection in 6 cases (33.3%), and incision infection and paralytic intestinal obstruction were cured and discharged after non-surgical treatment. There was no recurrence, patch infection or chronic pain during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The tension-free repair of parastomal hernia using robotic system and laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible, with few perioperative complications, fast postoperative recovery, and definite curative effects.

图1 机器人造口旁疝修补术Sugarbaker法病例手术过程 A为部分肠管粘连于疝囊与疝环;B为分离还纳疝内容物并分离粘连肠管;C为拉拢缝合关闭疝环;D为置入补片(20 cm×15 cm);E为机器人下补片上方近侧缝合固定;F为造口旁疝补片修补完成(Sugarbaker法)
图2 机器人造口旁疝修补术Keyhole法病例手术过程 A为部分肠管粘连于疝囊与疝环;B为分离还纳疝内容物并分离粘连肠管,肠系膜短小固定;C为缩小疝环并缝合关闭疝囊;D为置入补片(30 cm×20 cm)并裁剪造口肠管通过处;E为放置补片花瓣状包绕造口肠管周围(Keyhole法);F为下缝合补片固定于造口肠管
[1]
Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, et al. Parastomal hernia:A growing problem with new solutions[J]. Dig Surg, 2014, 31(4-5): 366-376.
[2]
Serra-Aracil X, Moreno-Matias J, Mora-Lopez J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(4):583-587.
[3]
Târcoveanu E, Vasilescu A, Cotea E, et al. Parastomal hernias-clinical study of therapeutic strategies[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2014, 109(2): 179-184.
[4]
Keller P, Totten CF, Plymale MA, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair delays recurrence relative to open repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(1): 415-422.
[5]
杨媛媛,黄鹤光. 机器人辅助食管裂孔疝手术临床应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 449-451, 498.
[6]
杨媛媛,黄鹤光. 机器人手术在造口旁疝修补手术中的应用价值[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(5): 404-406.
[7]
Hong SY, Oh SY, Lee JH, et al. Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2013, 84(1): 43-47.
[8]
Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, et al. Prospective,randomized study on the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia of permanent colostomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015, 58(10): 943-949.
[9]
Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh:A 5-year follow-up of a randomized study[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(1): 118-123.
[10]
Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(8): 931-936.
[11]
Figel NA, Rostas JW, Ellis CN. Outcomes using a bioprosthetic mesh at the time of permanent stoma creation in preventing a parastomal hernia:A value analysis[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 203(3): 323-326.
[12]
Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(5): 623-631.
[13]
Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, et al. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate:A randomized trial[J]. Colorecta Dis, 2015, 17(10): 191-197.
[14]
López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(6): 923-928.
[15]
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(4): 535-541.
[16]
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy reduces the rate of parastomal hernia:short-term results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(4): 663-669.
[17]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia AJM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[18]
Porcheron J, Payan B, Balique JG. Mesh repair of paracolostomal hernia by laparoscopy[J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12(10):1281.
[19]
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS,et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair:A systematic review of the literature[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 685-695.
[20]
何凯,姚琪远,陈浩. 腹腔镜造口重做造口旁疝补片修补术的手术效果及安全性评估[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2010, 15(6): 616-619.
[21]
DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, et al. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(28): 8670-8677.
[22]
张剑. 造口旁疝的发生机制和预防注意事项[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 1-3.
[1] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[4] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[5] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[6] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[7] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[8] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[9] 张蕾, 彭超, 周应芳. 直肠阴道隔子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 257-261.
[10] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[11] 李干斌, 侯睿, 郭雅萍, 张潇, 邱小原, 牛备战, 林国乐. 改良经辅助切口回肠造口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 271-276.
[12] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[13] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[14] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[15] 吕东, 朱盛, 胡秋平, 徐如祥. 腹腔镜下直肠癌手术并发颅内静脉窦血栓一例报道[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 250-253.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?