切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 336 -340. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.05.005

论著

机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析
杨媛媛1, 黄鹤光1,(), 陈燕昌1, 陆逢春1, 林贤超1, 林荣贵1, 王丛菲1   
  1. 1. 350001 福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院基本外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-18 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 黄鹤光
  • 基金资助:
    福建省微创医学中心与普通外科国家临床重点专科(闽卫医政〔2021〕76号)

Clinical analysis of 18 cases with parastomal hernia treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery

Yuanyuan Yang1, Heguang Huang1,(), Yanchang Chen1, Fengchun Lu1, Xianchao Lin1, Ronggui Lin1, Congfei Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2022-07-18 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Heguang Huang
引用本文:

杨媛媛, 黄鹤光, 陈燕昌, 陆逢春, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 王丛菲. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.

Yuanyuan Yang, Heguang Huang, Yanchang Chen, Fengchun Lu, Xianchao Lin, Ronggui Lin, Congfei Wang. Clinical analysis of 18 cases with parastomal hernia treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人和腹腔镜微创手术在造口旁疝治疗中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析2018年4月至2022年4月在福建医科大学附属协和医院使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术的18例患者资料。记录并比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、恢复进食时间、术后切口感染、麻痹性肠梗阻、引流管拔除时间、住院天数等,远期随访指标包括复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。

结果

18例均顺利完成造口旁疝无张力修补术,合并行造口重建术4例(22.2%)。Sugarbaker法修补13例(72.2%),其中使用达芬奇机器人系统2例,使用腹腔镜11例;Keyhole法修补5例(27.7%),其中使用达芬奇机器人系统1例,使用腹腔镜4例。手术时间191~406 min,平均(276.8±71.3)min。术中出血量20~100 ml,平均(29.3±22.2)ml。术后第2天恢复流质饮食,第3天进食半流质;放置引流管病例,术后5~7 d拔除引流管;常规腹带束缚3~6个月。术后住院时间3~19 d,平均(8.2±4.7)d。术后复发1例(5.6%),切口感染1例(5.6%),麻痹性肠梗阻3例(16.7%),肺部感染6例(33.3%),切口感染及麻痹性肠梗阻病例均经过非手术治疗后痊愈出院。随访期间均未出现复发、补片感染、慢性疼痛。

结论

使用达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜进行微创造口旁疝无张力修补术均安全可行,围手术期并发症少,术后恢复快,疗效确切。

Objective

To explore the application of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery in parastomal hernia repair.

Methods

The data of 18 patients who underwent parastomal hernia tension-free repair using robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery from April 2018 to April 2022 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, recovery time of eating, postoperative incision infection, paralytic intestinal obstruction, drainage tube extraction time, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up indicators including recurrence, patch infection, and chronic pain were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

Tension-free repair of parastomal hernia was successfully completed in 18 cases, and 4 cases (22.2%) underwent stoma reconstruction. Sugarbaker method was performed in 13 cases (72.2%), of which 2 cases used robotic surgery and 11 cases used laparoscopic surgery. Keyhole method was performed in 5 cases (27.7%), of which 1 case used robotic surgery and 4 cases used laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 191-406 min, with an average of (276.8±71.3) minutes. Intraoperative blood loss was 20-100 ml, with an average of (29.3±22.2) ml. Liquid diet was resumed on the second day after operation, and semi-liquid diet was taken on the third day. The drainage tube was placed and removed 5-7 days after the operation. The routine abdominal girdle was restrained for 3-6 months. The postoperative hospital stay was 3-19 days, with an average of (8.2±4.7) days. Postoperative recurrence occurred in 1 case (5.6%), incision infection in 1 case (5.6%), paralytic intestinal obstruction in 3 cases (16.7%), pulmonary infection in 6 cases (33.3%), and incision infection and paralytic intestinal obstruction were cured and discharged after non-surgical treatment. There was no recurrence, patch infection or chronic pain during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The tension-free repair of parastomal hernia using robotic system and laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible, with few perioperative complications, fast postoperative recovery, and definite curative effects.

图1 机器人造口旁疝修补术Sugarbaker法病例手术过程 A为部分肠管粘连于疝囊与疝环;B为分离还纳疝内容物并分离粘连肠管;C为拉拢缝合关闭疝环;D为置入补片(20 cm×15 cm);E为机器人下补片上方近侧缝合固定;F为造口旁疝补片修补完成(Sugarbaker法)
图2 机器人造口旁疝修补术Keyhole法病例手术过程 A为部分肠管粘连于疝囊与疝环;B为分离还纳疝内容物并分离粘连肠管,肠系膜短小固定;C为缩小疝环并缝合关闭疝囊;D为置入补片(30 cm×20 cm)并裁剪造口肠管通过处;E为放置补片花瓣状包绕造口肠管周围(Keyhole法);F为下缝合补片固定于造口肠管
[1]
Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, et al. Parastomal hernia:A growing problem with new solutions[J]. Dig Surg, 2014, 31(4-5): 366-376.
[2]
Serra-Aracil X, Moreno-Matias J, Mora-Lopez J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(4):583-587.
[3]
Târcoveanu E, Vasilescu A, Cotea E, et al. Parastomal hernias-clinical study of therapeutic strategies[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2014, 109(2): 179-184.
[4]
Keller P, Totten CF, Plymale MA, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair delays recurrence relative to open repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(1): 415-422.
[5]
杨媛媛,黄鹤光. 机器人辅助食管裂孔疝手术临床应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 449-451, 498.
[6]
杨媛媛,黄鹤光. 机器人手术在造口旁疝修补手术中的应用价值[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(5): 404-406.
[7]
Hong SY, Oh SY, Lee JH, et al. Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2013, 84(1): 43-47.
[8]
Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, et al. Prospective,randomized study on the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia of permanent colostomy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015, 58(10): 943-949.
[9]
Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh:A 5-year follow-up of a randomized study[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(1): 118-123.
[10]
Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(8): 931-936.
[11]
Figel NA, Rostas JW, Ellis CN. Outcomes using a bioprosthetic mesh at the time of permanent stoma creation in preventing a parastomal hernia:A value analysis[J]. Am J Surg, 2012, 203(3): 323-326.
[12]
Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57(5): 623-631.
[13]
Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, et al. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate:A randomized trial[J]. Colorecta Dis, 2015, 17(10): 191-197.
[14]
López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(6): 923-928.
[15]
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(4): 535-541.
[16]
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy reduces the rate of parastomal hernia:short-term results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(4): 663-669.
[17]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia AJM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[18]
Porcheron J, Payan B, Balique JG. Mesh repair of paracolostomal hernia by laparoscopy[J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12(10):1281.
[19]
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS,et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair:A systematic review of the literature[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 685-695.
[20]
何凯,姚琪远,陈浩. 腹腔镜造口重做造口旁疝补片修补术的手术效果及安全性评估[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2010, 15(6): 616-619.
[21]
DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, et al. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(28): 8670-8677.
[22]
张剑. 造口旁疝的发生机制和预防注意事项[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 1-3.
[1] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[2] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[3] 孟令展, 朱震宇. 达芬奇机器人辅助肝中叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-373.
[4] 段东峰, 王成果, 王青, 王健, 惠立良, 莘玮, 杨媛. 两种造口旁疝修补术的临床效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 435-438.
[5] 谢秋波, 周宇, 宋健, 涂忠, 李想, 汪仁昊, 伍依依, 潘铁军. 全息影像在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中保留膀胱颈的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-213.
[6] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[7] 方红燕, 刘晓昌, 方家旭. 腹部按压联合综合护理在腹壁造口旁疝患者肠镜检查中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-629.
[8] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[9] 刘宁, 耿伟民, 刘昆强. 腹腔高位隐睾Fowler-Stephen手术二期开放与腹腔镜手术对比分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 299-302.
[10] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[11] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科单孔腹腔镜全国科研协作组. 妇科单孔腹腔镜手术镜下联合体外操作模式临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 200-209.
[12] 朱伟权, 叶善平, 唐和春, 刘东宁, 鞠后琼, 仲崇晗, 黄智翔, 李太原. 机器人辅助直肠癌NOSES术后细菌学及肿瘤学结果的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 282-287.
[13] 邱文龙, 刘军广, 胡刚, 梅世文, 汤坚强. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后的长期生存结果及预后因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 207-213.
[14] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[15] 马洪庆, 于淼, 张建锋, 武雪亮, 胡旭华, 王光林, 孟泽松, 于滨, 王贵英. 混合入路与传统中央入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 545-550.
阅读次数
全文


摘要