切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 407 -411. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.06.005

论著

白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的疗效观察
宁涓1,(), 王晓燕2, 魏华萍2   
  1. 1. 100080 北京市海淀医院肿瘤血液内科
    2. 101400 北京怀柔医院肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-18 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 宁涓
  • 基金资助:
    北京市海淀医院面上项目(BHHMEC-XM-2021-08)

Efficacy of albumin bound paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Juan Ning1,(), Xiaoyan Wang2, Huaping Wei2   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Haidian Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100080, China
    2. Department of Oncology, Huairou Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 101400, China
  • Received:2022-08-18 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Juan Ning
引用本文:

宁涓, 王晓燕, 魏华萍. 白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的疗效观察[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 407-411.

Juan Ning, Xiaoyan Wang, Huaping Wei. Efficacy of albumin bound paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 407-411.

目的

探讨白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗吉西他滨为基础的一线化疗失败的转移性胰腺癌的有效性和安全性。

方法

选择2014年1月至2020年7月在北京怀柔医院经穿刺病理确诊为转移性胰腺癌且吉西他滨为基础的一线化疗失败的50例患者,其中对照组25例,采用mFOLFOX6方案治疗;观察组25例,采用白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案治疗。回顾性分析两组患者的临床特征、治疗方法、近远期疗效及不良反应发生情况。

结果

治疗2周期后,对照组完全缓解(CR)0例,部分缓解(PR)10例,疾病稳定(SD)12例,疾病进展(PD)3例,客观缓解率(ORR)为40.0%,疾病控制率(DCR)为88.0%。观察组CR 0例,PR 12例,SD 11例,PD 2例,ORR为48.0%,DCR为92.0%。两组ORR、DCR差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.325,P=0.569;χ2=0.222,P=0.637)。对照组和观察组中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为4.2个月(95% CI:3.711~4.692个月)和4.6个月(95% CI:3.765~5.435个月),中位总生存期(OS)分别为7.4个月(95% CI:7.050~7.750个月)和7.9个月(95% CI:7.679~8.121个月),两组PFS和OS差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.419,P=0.517;χ2=2.978,P=0.084)。观察组的化疗耐受性优于对照组,不良反应主要为嗜中性粒细胞减少(16.0%)、贫血(12.0%)、感觉神经毒性(40.0%)、乏力(20.0%)、肝功能损伤(12.0%)、恶心(8.0%)和腹泻(12.0%),其3、4级不良反应发生率显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对于吉西他滨为基础的一线化疗失败的转移性胰腺癌,白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案与mFOLFOX6方案疗效相当,且不良反应较低。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of albumin bound paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer with first-line gemcitabine based chemotherapy failure.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after first-line gemcitabine based chemotherapy failure in Huairou Hospital of Beijing from January 2014 to July 2020 were divided into two groups according to different treatment regimens. 25 cases in the control group were treated with mFOLFOX6 regimen, while 25 cases in the observation group were treated with albumin bound paclitaxel regimen. The clinical characteristics, treatment methods, short-and long-term effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

After two cycles of treatment, there were 0 case of complete remission (CR), 10 cases of partial remission (PR), 12 cases of stable disease (SD), and 3 cases of disease progression (PD), the objective response rate (ORR) was 40.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 88.0% in the control group. In the observation group, there were 0 case of CR, 12 cases of PR, 11 cases of SD and 2 cases of PD, ORR was 48.0%, DCR was 92.0%. There were no significant differences in ORR and DCR between the two groups (χ2=0.325, P=0.569; χ2=0.222, P=0.637). The median progression free survival (PFS) of the control group and the observation group were 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.711-4.692 months) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.765-5.435 months), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months (95% CI: 7.050-7.750 months) and 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.679-8.121 months), respectively. There were no significant differences in PFS and OS of the two groups ( χ2=0.419, P=0.517; χ2=2.978, P=0.084). The chemotherapy tolerance of the observation group was better than that of the control group. The main adverse reactions were neutropenia (16.0%), anemia (12.0%), sensory neurotoxicity (40.0%), asthenia (20.0%), liver function damage (12.0%), nausea (8.0%) and diarrhea (12.0%). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Albumin bound paclitaxel regimen is comparable to the mFOLFOX6 regimen in the treatment of first-line resistant metastatic pancreatic cancer and the adverse reactions are low.

表1 两组转移性胰腺癌患者一般资料的比较[例(%)]
表2 两组转移性胰腺癌患者治疗2周期后的短期疗效比较[例(%)]
图1 两组转移性胰腺癌患者的无进展生存期Kaplan-Meier曲线
图2 两组转移性胰腺癌患者的总生存期Kaplan-Meier曲线
表3 两组转移性胰腺癌3级和4级不良反应比较[例(%)]
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30.
[2]
Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Korn RL, et al. Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase Ⅲ trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27(4): 648-653.
[3]
Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, et al. Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(4): 317-327.
[4]
Philip PA, Lacy J, Portales F, et al. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPACT): A multicentre, open-label phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(3): 285-294.
[5]
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364(19): 1817-1825.
[6]
Grimaldi S, Terroir M, Caramella C. Advances in oncological treatment: limitations of RECIST 1.1 criteria[J]. Q J Nucl Me Mol Imaging, 2018, 62(2): 129-139.
[7]
Han SY, Kim DU, Seol YM, et al. Comparison of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2020, 8(17): 3718-3729.
[8]
Thomas H. IL-6 drives niche formation in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 16(5): 263.
[9]
刘梦奇,吉顺荣,徐晓武, 等. 2019年胰腺癌研究及诊疗新进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(1): 1-10.
[10]
Foschini F, Napolitano F, Servetto A, et al. FOLFIRINOX after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: A retrospective comparison with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI schedules[J]. Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2020, 12: 1758835920947970.
[11]
Hoy SM. Albumin-bound paclitaxel: A review of its use for the first-line combination treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. Drugs, 2014, 74(15): 1757-1768.
[12]
翟鹏涛,李梅,庞宏涛. 吉西他滨联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效及安全性[J]. 癌症进展, 2021, 19(6): 619-622.
[13]
唐美月,石宇,王思亮, 等. 白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗局部进展期胰腺癌的疗效观察[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2016, 19(5): 565-567.
[1] 赵之明, 尹注增, 刘荣. 胰腺癌转化治疗及机器人胰体尾癌根治性切除[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 160-160.
[2] 贾成朋, 王代宏, 陈华, 孙备. 可切除性胰腺癌预后术前预测模型的建立及应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-570.
[3] 李泽乾, 郝少龙, 张博, 纪凯伦, 韩威. 外周血非编码RNA在胰腺癌中研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 217-220.
[4] 张太平, 翁桂湖, 刘悦泽. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胰腺癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 120-123.
[5] 田锋, 郭俊超. 中国微创技术在胰腺癌手术中的应用现状和展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 124-128.
[6] 韩显林, 林伯铮, 洪夏飞. 腹腔镜胰腺癌手术研究进展及血管解剖要点[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 129-132.
[7] 毛永欢, 奚玲, 陆晨, 刘理想, 喻春钊, 沈晓菲. PI3K/Akt信号通路通过Plk1影响胰腺癌细胞PANC-1对吉西他滨的化疗敏感性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 135-138.
[8] 李永宁, 付雪芹, 李英, 刘鹏, 刘松柏, 潘耀振. 基因相似序列家族成员126A靶向调控波形蛋白促进胰腺癌细胞侵袭和迁移及其机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 139-144.
[9] 张原, 李小龙, 王亚鹏. 胰腺癌中ANGPTL2蛋白与免疫抑制细胞浸润的关系及临床意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 145-148.
[10] 郭伟林, 李运涛, 尚培中, 李晓武, 李伟. 胰腺癌S100A4和Midkine表达研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 149-152.
[11] 张博, 韩威, 郝少龙, 李泽乾, 纪智礼. 竞争内源性RNA在胰腺癌研究中的进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 213-216.
[12] 韩显林. 完全腹腔镜根治性胰十二指肠切除术(联合肠系膜上静脉切除人工血管重建)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 133-133.
[13] 黄彩英, 陈萍, 潘杰, 莫彩云, 尚敏红, 周俊. 紫杉醇治疗胸腺鳞癌致大疱性表皮松解坏死性药疹救治成功一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 442-444.
[14] 王迪, 吕少诚, 黄金灿, 潘飞, 姜涛, 郎韧. 肺腺癌胰腺转移伴门静脉侵犯一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 457-460.
[15] 曹文玺, 陈箫, 竺来法, 周永平. 尼妥珠单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 409-413.
阅读次数
全文


摘要