超声内镜引导下胆囊穿刺引流治疗低位恶性梗阻性黄疸的动物实验研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.06.006

目的

基于动物实验模型，探讨超声内镜引导下胆囊穿刺引流术（EUS-GBD）在低位恶性梗阻性黄疸（MOJ）姑息治疗中的应用效果。

方法

纳入SPF级小型实验猪24只，均于腹腔镜下建立低位MOJ模型。按照随机数字表法将模型猪分为实验组和对照组，每组12只，实验组给予EUS-GBD治疗方案，对照组给予经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术（PTGBD）治疗方案。观察两组手术操作成功率、治疗效果、肝功能指标（总胆红素、直接胆红素、天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶）水平变化及术后并发症发生情况。

结果

24只实验猪均成功建立低位MOJ模型。两组首次操作成功率和治疗总有效率差异均无统计学意义。术后7 d，两组肝功能指标水平均较同组术前明显降低（均P<0.05），但组间差异无统计学意义。实验组术后并发症发生率为25.0%（3/12），低于对照组的41.7%（5/12），但组间差异无统计学意义（P=0.667）；两组均无出血、穿孔及导管脱落发生。

结论

EUS-GBD治疗低位MOJ操作成功率高，能有效缓解MOJ的梗阻症状，改善肝功能，整体效果不亚于PTGBD。

关键词: 超声内镜, 胆囊穿刺引流, 恶性梗阻性黄疸, 操作成功率, 肝功能, 并发症

Objective

To investigate the effect of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) in palliative treatment of low malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) based on animal experimental model.

Methods

A total of 24 SPF miniature experimental pigs were included, and the low MOJ model was established under laparoscopy. The model pigs were divided into experimental group and control group according to random number table method, with 12 pigs in each group. The experimental group was given EUS-GBD treatment, and the control group was given percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) treatment. The success rate of operation, therapeutic effect, changes of liver function indexes such as total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and postoperative morbidity were compared.

Results

The MOJ model was successfully established in 24 experimental pigs. There were no significant differences in the success rate of the first operation and the total effective rate between the two groups. On the 7th day after operation, the levels of liver function indexes in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation in the same group (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was 25.0% (3/12), lower than 41.7% (5/12) in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.667). No bleeding, perforation or catheter shedding were observed in both groups.

Conclusion

EUS-GBD has a high success rate in the treatment of low MOJ, which can effectively alleviate the obstructive symptoms of MOJ and improve liver function of patients, and the overall effect is superior to PTGBD.

Key words: Endoscopic ultrasonography, Gallbladder drainage, Malignant obstructive jaundice, Operation success rate, Liver function, Complications

表1 建模前后各时间点实验猪肝功能指标水平变化(n=24,±s)

项目	建模前	建模后第1周	建模后第2周	建模后第3周	建模后第4周
总胆红素(μmol/L)	19.6±3.1	48.3±12.3^a	99.5±24.8^ab	195.2±32.4^abc	312.8±40.5^abd
直接胆红素(μmol/L)	7.6±2.8	29.7±8.4^a	67.5±19.5^ab	98.4±27.2^abc	188.9±36.3^abd
天冬氨酸转氨酶(U/L)	36.4±5.2	64.5±9.6^a	103.2±18.4^ab	142.6±26.8^abc	220.5±33.7^abd
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L)	38.9±6.2	51.6±11.3^a	69.2±16.7^ab	97.5±24.8^abc	141.3±31.4^abd

表1 建模前后各时间点实验猪肝功能指标水平变化(n=24,±s)

项目	建模前	建模后第1周	建模后第2周	建模后第3周	建模后第4周
总胆红素(μmol/L)	19.6±3.1	48.3±12.3^a	99.5±24.8^ab	195.2±32.4^abc	312.8±40.5^abd
直接胆红素(μmol/L)	7.6±2.8	29.7±8.4^a	67.5±19.5^ab	98.4±27.2^abc	188.9±36.3^abd
天冬氨酸转氨酶(U/L)	36.4±5.2	64.5±9.6^a	103.2±18.4^ab	142.6±26.8^abc	220.5±33.7^abd
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L)	38.9±6.2	51.6±11.3^a	69.2±16.7^ab	97.5±24.8^abc	141.3±31.4^abd

表2 两组实验猪治疗效果比较[n(%)]

组别	n	显效	有效	无效	总有效
实验组	12	7(58.4)	4(33.3)	1(8.3)	11(91.7)
对照组	12	6(50.0)	4(33.7)	2(16.7)	10(83.3)
统计值			Z=-0.515		-
P值			0.671^a		1.000^b

表2 两组实验猪治疗效果比较[n(%)]

组别	n	显效	有效	无效	总有效
实验组	12	7(58.4)	4(33.3)	1(8.3)	11(91.7)
对照组	12	6(50.0)	4(33.7)	2(16.7)	10(83.3)
统计值			Z=-0.515		-
P值			0.671^a		1.000^b

表3 两组实验猪手术前后肝功能指标水平比较(±s)

组别	n	时间	TBIL(μmol/L)	DBIL(μmol/L)	AST(U/L)	ALT(U/L)
实验组	12	术前	313.4±41.2	189.6±35.4	221.3±31.5	142.5±32.3
实验组	12	术后7 d	165.5±28.8^a	86.8±24.9^a	103.6±22.7^a	69.2±19.8^a
		t₁值	10.123	8.228	10.501	6.432
		P₁值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
对照组	12	术前	314.3±40.3	188.2±37.6	219.7±33.3	140.9±35.7
对照组	12	术后7 d	171.7±25.6^a	89.6±27.7^a	107.5±23.6^a	74.5±20.5^a
		t₁值	10.274	7.314	9.523	5.587
		P₁值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
t₂值			0.557	0.260	0.413	0.644
P₂值			0.583	0.797	0.684	0.526

表3 两组实验猪手术前后肝功能指标水平比较(±s)

组别	n	时间	TBIL(μmol/L)	DBIL(μmol/L)	AST(U/L)	ALT(U/L)
实验组	12	术前	313.4±41.2	189.6±35.4	221.3±31.5	142.5±32.3
实验组	12	术后7 d	165.5±28.8^a	86.8±24.9^a	103.6±22.7^a	69.2±19.8^a
		t₁值	10.123	8.228	10.501	6.432
		P₁值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
对照组	12	术前	314.3±40.3	188.2±37.6	219.7±33.3	140.9±35.7
对照组	12	术后7 d	171.7±25.6^a	89.6±27.7^a	107.5±23.6^a	74.5±20.5^a
		t₁值	10.274	7.314	9.523	5.587
		P₁值	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
t₂值			0.557	0.260	0.413	0.644
P₂值			0.583	0.797	0.684	0.526

[18]	Choi JH, Kim HW, Lee JC, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic versus EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for malignant cystic duct obstruction[J]. Gastrointest Endos, 2017, 85(2): 357-364.
[1]	Romashchenko PN, Maistrenko NA, Kuznetsov AI, et al. Malignant obstructive jaundice: justification of the method of biliary decompression[J]. Ann HPB Surg, 2020, 25(2): 124-136.
[2]	刘丰豪，蒋晓忠，余钰, 等. ERCP与PTCD应用于恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(3): 43-51.
[3]	Duan F, Cui L, Bai Y, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2017, 17(1): 27.
[4]	曾江潮，隆洪木，许仲平, 等. 两种姑息性引流方式治疗低位恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效及免疫学变化分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2018, 15(12): 1858-1860.
[5]	赵凯越，张凯，王晟, 等. 超声内镜引导下胆囊介入治疗研究进展[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(12): 1503-1506.
[6]	龚建平，程瑶. 恶性梗阻性黄疸术前减黄的标准、指征及效果[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(7): 781-783.
[7]	高建平，李爽，孙震, 等. 术前减黄在中度恶性梗阻性黄疸胰十二指肠切除中的价值[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(4): 381-385.
[8]	梁勇，母齐鸣，万波,等. ERCP放置胆道内支架行姑息性胆道引流术治疗低位恶性梗阻性黄疸的临床疗效分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 348-351.
[9]	孙敏志，徐阿曼，袁笑, 等. PTCD与胆肠内引流术治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的临床分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2018, 26(3): 191-194.
[10]	潘孜博，王宇宏，孔哲, 等. 低位恶性梗阻性黄疸术前胆道引流方式的选择[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2020, 26(4): 259-264.
[11]	陆磊，杨建锋，张筱凤. 内镜超声引导下胆囊穿刺引流术的研究进展[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017, 34(7): 526-529.
[12]	Teoh AY, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R, et al. Outcomes of an international multicenter registry on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2019, 7(8): E964-E973.
[13]	齐中，邢颖，汪鑫, 等. 恶性梗阻性黄疸的微创减黄治疗[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2021, 49(4): 391-393.
[14]	朱宏毅，沈火剑，李奇为, 等. 三种胆道引流手术治疗恶性阻塞性黄疸的疗效分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2018, 30(6): 467-470.
[15]	刘恩硕，张凯，杨飞, 等. 内镜超声引导下胆囊引流术的方法和价值[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2019, 36(9): 636-639.
[16]	Minaga K, Yamashita Y, Ogura T, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage replacement of percutaneous drainage: A multicenter retrospective study[J]. Dig Endosc, 2019, 31(2): 180-187.
[17]	Luk SW, Irani S, Krishnamoorthi R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(8): 722-732.

[1]	杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[2]	李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3]	逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4]	杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[5]	鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[6]	陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[7]	阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[8]	叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[9]	袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10]	夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11]	代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[12]	王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[13]	潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14]	崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15]	王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage in the treatment of low malignant obstructive jaundice: An animal experimental study

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage in the treatment of low malignant obstructive jaundice: An animal experimental study