切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 417 -421. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.06.007

论著

胰十二指肠切除术后复杂腹腔感染的危险因素分析及病原菌构成
李存权1, 崔磊1, 柳科军2, 李政权1, 刘俊豪1, 卜阳1,()   
  1. 1. 750002 银川,宁夏回族自治区人民医院肝胆外科;750004 银川,宁夏医科大学临床医学院
    2. 750004 银川,宁夏医科大学临床医学院;750004 银川,宁夏医科大学总医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 卜阳

Risk factors and pathogen composition of complicated intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Cunquan Li1, Lei Cui1, Kejun Liu2, Zhengquan Li1, Junhao Liu1, Yang Bu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People’s Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan 750002, China; School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
    2. School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical Universtiy, Yinchuan 750004, China
  • Received:2022-09-29 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yang Bu
引用本文:

李存权, 崔磊, 柳科军, 李政权, 刘俊豪, 卜阳. 胰十二指肠切除术后复杂腹腔感染的危险因素分析及病原菌构成[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 417-421.

Cunquan Li, Lei Cui, Kejun Liu, Zhengquan Li, Junhao Liu, Yang Bu. Risk factors and pathogen composition of complicated intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 417-421.

目的

通过探讨胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后发生复杂腹腔感染(cIAI)的相关影响因素及病原菌构成,为PD后cIAI的预防提供一定的依据。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2020年1月于宁夏医科大学总医院行PD患者病例资料,按照纳入标准收集发生cIAI 89例为感染组;从360余例未发生cIAI患者中按照约1∶1的比例等距随机抽样91例为对照组。收集感染组术后引流液的细菌培养情况,统计描述病原菌构成;单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析PD后发生cIAI的危险因素。

结果

术前减黄(OR=6.569,95% CI:1.178~14.630)、手术时间≥6 h(OR=6.872,95% CI:2.258~20.913)和术后胰瘘(OR=3.426,95% CI:1.219~9.631)是PD后发生cIAI的危险因素(均P<0.05)。培养菌株28种,革兰阴性菌以大肠埃希菌、阴沟肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌居多(总构成比为50.00%),革兰阳性菌以屎肠球菌居多(构成比为52.17%),真菌中以白色念珠菌居多(构成比为92.86%)。

结论

PD后发生cIAI病情危重,合理的术前减黄及缩短手术时间对于cIAI的预防尤为重要,应及时合理应用抗生素进行综合治疗。

Objective

To explore the related factors and pathogen composition of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), providing evidence for the prevention of cIAI after PD.

Methods

From January 2010 to January 2020, 89 patients with cIAI after PD were retrospectively collected as the infectious group in General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. According to the inclusion criteria, 91 patients without cIAI after PD were collected as the control group by equidistant random sampling at a ratio of about 1∶1. The pathogen composition was described statistically according to the results of bacterial culture of the drainage fluid in the infection group. The risk factors of cIAI after PD were analyzed by single- and multi-variate Logistic regression analysis. Preoperative biliary drainage (OR=6.569, 95% CI: 1.178-14.630), operation time ≥ 6 h (OR=6.872, 95% CI: 2.258-20.913) and pancreatic fistula (OR=3.426, 95% CI: 1.219-9.631) were the risk factors for cIAI after PD (all P<0.05). There were 28 varieties of cultivated strains. The majority of gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, the total composition ratio was 50.00%. Enterococcus faecium was the major Gram-positive bacteria, with a composition ratio of 52.17%; and Candida albicans is the most common fungus (92.86%).

Conclusions

The occurrence of cIAI after PD is critical. Rational preoperative biliary drainage and shortening surgery time are particularly vital for the prevention of cIAI. Comprehensive treatment with antibiotics should be carried out in a timely and reasonable manner.

表1 两组胰十二指肠切除术患者一般资料的比较
表2 胰十二指肠术后发生复杂腹腔感染术前和术后危险因素的单因素分析
变量 对照组 感染组 统计值 P
例数 91 89    
白细胞(×109/L)        
  术前a 5.76±1.74 6.29±1.99 -1.896 0.065
  术后b 9.95(7.84,11.75) 12.41(8.56,15.32) -3.136 0.002e
NLRb        
  术前 4.00(1.86,4.29) 3.45(2.08,4.31) -1.538 0.124
  术后 11.23(6.48,13.53) 11.75(6.64,14.32) -0.044 0.965
PLRb        
  术前 192.90(165.39, 220.40) 196.27(166.77, 225.78) -0.512 0.398
  术后 224.01(154.90, 288.88) 254.89(149.15, 325.30) -1.124 0.261
血红蛋白(g/L)b        
  术前 129.00(120.00, 138.00) 131.00(117.00, 140.00) -0.572 0.567
  术后 96.91(87.00, 108.00) 100.10(90.50, 108.00) -1.576 0.115
血小板(×109/L)b        
  术前 217.70(175.00, 255.00) 252.69(119.00, 305.00) -1.628 0.129
  术后 169.71(130.00, 210.00) 226.45(163.00, 291.50) -4.595 <0.001e
总胆红素(μmol/L)b        
  术前 82.20(16.40, 204.60) 149.40(26.75, 257.65) -2.282 0.023d
  术后 78.21(18.50, 126.50) 122.21(34.25, 188.05) -3.008 0.003e
非结合胆红素(μmol/L)b        
  术前 29.16(9.90, 35.30) 34.74(12.59, 38.40) -1.561 0.119
  术后 22.28(10.40, 28.80) 28.57(12.45, 40.15) -1.898 0.058
白蛋白(g/L)b        
  术前 36.17(33.80, 38.40) 34.78(31.95, 38.09) -1.671 0.095
  术后 29.56(27.00, 32.30) 30.13(27.55, 32.20) -0.856 0.392
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L)c        
  术前 203.60(45.10, 307.50) 175.13(47.40, 229.45) -1.036 0.300
  术后 80.54(41.30, 101.20) 91.06(35.25, 79.30) -0.303 0.762
天冬氨酸转氨酶(U/L)c        
  术前 148.24(28.00, 224.00) 114.12(34.65, 162.70) -0.239 0.811
  术后 44.12(23.20, 49.30) 50.43(35.25, 79.30) -1.604 0.109
CA19-9(kU/L)c     1.858 0.173
  阴性 27(29.70) 35(39.30)    
  阳性 64(70.30) 54(60.70)    
癌胚抗原(μg/L)c     1.285 0.257
  阴性 73(80.20) 77(86.50)    
  阳性 18(19.80) 12(13.50)    
术前减黄     26.479 <0.001e
  50(54.90) 16(18.00)    
  41(45.10) 73(82.00)    
术后入住ICUc     3.630 0.057
  52(57.10) 63(70.80)    
  39(42.90) 26(36.10)    
术后肺部感染c     4.981 0.260
  34(37.40) 48(53.90)    
  57(62.60) 41(46.10)    
术后胰瘘c     34.032 <0.001e
  21(23.10) 30(33.70)    
  70(76.90) 59(66.30)    
表3 胰十二指肠术后发生复杂腹腔感染术中指标的单因素分析
表4 胰十二指肠术后发生复杂腹腔感染的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Cameron JL, Jin He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(4): 530-536.
[2]
Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Catena F, et al. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A prospective multicentre study (WISS Study)[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2015, 10: 61.
[3]
Leone S, Damiani G, Pezone I, et al. New antimicrobial options for the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2019, 38(5): 819-827.
[4]
Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, et al. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2010, 11(1): 79-109.
[5]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(3): 584-591.
[6]
Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D, et al. Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(3): 313-318.
[7]
Mazuski JE, Tessier JM, May AK, et al. The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2017, 18(1): 1-76.
[8]
Tu RH, Lin JX, Desiderio J, et al. Does intra-abdominal infection after curative gastrectomy affect patients’ long-term prognosis? A multi-center study based on a large sample size[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2019, 20(4): 271-277.
[9]
张芬菊,胡国妃,徐灵剑, 等. 气管插管患者术后下呼吸道感染的危险因素及病原菌分析[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2021, 38(11): 850-852.
[10]
Wu JM, Ho TW, Yen HH, et al. Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage causes intra-abdominal abscess in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients: An important but neglected risk factor[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(4): 1086-1092.
[11]
van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(2): 129-137.
[12]
Shen Z, Chen H, Wang W, et al. Machine learning algorithms as early diagnostic tools for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy and guide drain removal: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 102: 106638.
[13]
薛鸿,陈江明,谢胜学, 等. 胰十二指肠切除术后发生胰瘘的危险因素分析[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志, 2020, 20(4): 259-264.
[14]
缪琦,杜华劲,高学键, 等. 普外科患者复杂腹腔感染的病原菌分布及药敏分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2021, 16(9): 1064-1068.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[5] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[6] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[7] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[8] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[13] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
[14] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
[15] 孙培培, 张二明, 时延伟, 赵春燕, 宋萍萍, 张硕, 张克, 周玉娇, 赵璨, 闫维, 吴蓉菊, 宋丽萍, 郭伟安, 马石头, 安欣华, 包曹歆, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病情况及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-719.
阅读次数
全文


摘要