切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 288 -292. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.04.010

论著

血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化在原发性胃癌中的诊断价值
朱磊磊, 朱冰, 管佳佳, 骆杰, 杭群, 傅军()   
  1. 233000 蚌埠医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-17 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 傅军
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021A0765)

Detection value of the promoter methylation of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 genes in primary gastric cancer

Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu, Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Qun Hang, Jun Fu()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, China
  • Received:2022-09-17 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Fu
引用本文:

朱磊磊, 朱冰, 管佳佳, 骆杰, 杭群, 傅军. 血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化在原发性胃癌中的诊断价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 288-292.

Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu, Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Qun Hang, Jun Fu. Detection value of the promoter methylation of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 genes in primary gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 288-292.

目的

通过测定胃癌患者血浆中细胞内游离DNA中PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子的甲基化情况,分析它们与胃癌疾病特征间的联系,并探讨三种基因启动子甲基化在筛查原发性胃癌中的协同检测功能。

方法

利用巢氏甲基化特异性PCR技术(MDA-nMSP)检测2020年12月至2021年12月收治的81例胃癌患者(胃癌组)血液样本中的PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子的甲基化率。另选取同期年龄构成相似的39名健康者作为对照组,比较两组各基因甲基化率的差异,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估血浆甲基化PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1对胃癌的预测价值。

结果

胃癌组血浆PAX5、SEPT9及WIF-1甲基化率分别为38.3%、34.6%、46.9%,高于对照组的7.7%、10.3%、5.1%,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=12.123、7.956、20.683,均P<0.01)。PAX5和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化的发生与患者年龄相关(P<0.05),SEPT9基因启动子甲基化的发生与肿瘤大小相关(P<0.05)。作为诊断靶点,甲基化PAX5诊断胃癌的敏感度为38.27%,特异度为92.31%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.653;SEPT9分别为34.57%、89.74%、0.622,WIF-1分别为46.91%、94.87%、0.709,三者联合诊断胃癌的敏感度、特异度分别为61.73%(95% CI:50.3%~72.3%)、84.62%(95% CI:69.5%~94.1%),AUC为0.732(95% CI:0.653~0.810)。

结论

原发性胃癌患者血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化率较高,三种甲基化基因联合诊断胃癌的特异度与单一基因诊断相似,但敏感度有较大提升,有望成为新的胃癌检测基因组合。

Objective

To determine the methylation of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene promoters in intracellular free DNA in the plasma of gastric cancer (GC) patients, and their relationship with the characteristics of GC, trying to explore the function of promoter methylation of the three genes in screening detection of primary GC.

Methods

The methylation rate of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 gene promoters in blood samples from 81 GC patients (GC group) and 39 healthy controls (control group) were measured using the nest methylation-specific PCR technology (MDA-nMSP). The difference of gene methylation rates between the two groups was compared, and the predictive value of plasma methylated PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene in GC were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve.

Results

The methylation rates of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 in GC group were 38.3%, 34.6% and 46.9% respectively, while those in the control group were 7.7%, 10.3%, and 5.1% respectively. There were significant differences in methylation rates of the three genes between the two groups (χ2=12.123, 7.956, 20.683; all P<0.01). The occurrence of PAX5 and WIF-1gene promoter methylation were correlated with patients’ age (P<0.05), and the occurrence of SEPT9 gene promoter methylation was correlated with tumor size (P<0.05). As a diagnostic target of GC, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of methylated PAX5 were 38.27%, 92.31%, and 0.653 respectively; 34.57%, 89.74% and 0.622 respectively for SEPT9; 46.91%, 94.87%, and 0.709 respectively for WIF-1. The sensitivity and specificity of combined diagnosis for GC were 61.73% (95% CI: 50.3%-72.3%), 84.62% (95% CI: 69.5%-94.1%), and AUC value was 0.732 (95% CI: 0.653-0.810).

Conclusions

The methylation rates of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene promoters in plasma of patients with primary GC are high. When the combination of the three genes for diagnosis of GC, the specificity is similar to that by any single gene, but the sensitivity is greatly improved, which is expected to become a new gene combination for GC detection.

表1 基因引物序列表
图1 PAX5、SEPT9、WIF-1基因MDA-nMSP产物凝胶电泳图 marker:DNA marker;a、b、c分别为三个随机样本(甲基化、部分甲基化、非甲基化);1和2分别为阳性对照和阴性对照;M:甲基化条带;U:非甲基化条带;A为PAX5基因;B为SEPT9基因;C为WIF-1基因
表2 血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化状态与胃癌临床病理特征的关系(例)
图2 甲基化基因PAX5、SEPT9、WIF-1单独及联合检测诊断原发性胃癌的受试者工作特征曲线
表3 甲基化基因PAX5、SEPT9及WIF-1单独和联合检测诊断原发性胃癌的效能
[1]
Liu D, Li L, Wang L, et al. Recognition of DNA methylation molecular features for diagnosis and prognosis in gastric cancer[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12: 758926.
[2]
谭智军, 赵玉国, 肖晓艳. 胃癌患者血浆PAX5和RNF180基因甲基化情况及其临床意义[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2021, 35(6): 584-587.
[3]
Li W, Ma X, Wang F, et al. SNHG3 affects gastric cancer development by regulating SEPT9 methylation[J]. J Oncol, 2022, 2022: 3433406.
[4]
Zhou Y, Li Z, Ding Y, et al. Promoter methylation of WNT inhibitory factor-1 may be associated with the pathogenesis of multiple human tumors[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2018, 14(Supplement): S381-S387.
[5]
Dai X, Ren T, Zhang Y, et al. Methylation multiplicity and its clinical values in cancer[J]. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2021, 23: e2.
[6]
Yang B, Wang JQ, Tan Y, et al. RNA methylation and cancer treatment[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2021, 174: 105937.
[7]
孙昌裕. 血浆PAX5、RNF180、PCDH10基因启动子甲基化检测在胃癌中的意义[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2017.
[8]
Jin L, Ma X, Lei X, et al. Cyclophosphamide inhibits Pax5 methylation to regulate the growth of retinoblastoma via the Notch1 pathway[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2021, 40(12_suppl): S497-S508.
[9]
Zhao L, Li S, Gan L, et al. Paired box 5 is a frequently methylated lung cancer tumour suppressor gene interfering β-catenin signalling and GADD45G expression[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2016, 20(5): 842-854.
[10]
Palmisano WA, Crume KP, Grimes MJ, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of the transcription factor genes PAX5 alpha and beta in human cancers[J]. Cancer Res, 2003, 63(15): 4620-4625.
[11]
余智操, 吴晋, 张琼, 等. SEPT 9基因与恶性肿瘤关系的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2018, 26(2): 297-301.
[12]
Liu SG, Luo GP, Qu YB, et al. Indirubin inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway via promoter demethylation of WIF-1[J]. BMC Complement Med Ther, 2020, 20(1): 250.
[13]
Guo Y, Guo W, Chen Z, et al. Hypermethylation and aberrant expression of Wnt-antagonist family genes in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma[J]. Neoplasma, 2011, 58(2): 110-117.
[14]
Kasztura M, Richard A, Bempong NE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: A scoping review[J]. Int J Public Health, 2019, 64(9): 1261-1271.
[1] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[2] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 闫笑生, 郑智, 翟育豪, 张海翘, 王鈢, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. Borrmann Ⅳ型胃癌临床诊断、病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 346-351.
[5] 王龙彪, 刘洪, 董天雄. 中心体扩增细胞占比和C反应蛋白-白蛋白比值对胃癌根治术治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 352-356.
[6] 韩晓帆, 段降龙, 付小庆, 马文星, 王泽正, 刘哲魁. 老年胃癌根治性全胃切除术围手术期并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 282-287.
[7] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[10] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[11] 高静, 严学倩, 及月茹, 郝淼旺, 刘苍春. 胃癌患者以慢性贫血为首发表现的高危因素Logistic分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 534-537.
[12] 张彬, 贾贵清, 吴东松, 曹绿洲, 张焰凌, 黄灏, 赵高平. 早期胃癌保功能手术治疗13例病例分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-579.
[13] 徐瑜杰, 赵国栋. 晚期胃癌治疗方法的研究进展和挑战[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 451-455.
[14] 黄勇, 郑智, 张海翘, 王龙, 辛城霖, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 456-460.
[15] 潘玮瑄, 郝少龙, 韩威. 低氧微环境与实体恶性肿瘤m6A修饰的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 461-464.
阅读次数
全文


摘要