切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 288 -292. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.04.010

论著

血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化在原发性胃癌中的诊断价值
朱磊磊, 朱冰, 管佳佳, 骆杰, 杭群, 傅军()   
  1. 233000 蚌埠医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-17 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 傅军
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021A0765)

Detection value of the promoter methylation of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 genes in primary gastric cancer

Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu, Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Qun Hang, Jun Fu()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, China
  • Received:2022-09-17 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Fu
引用本文:

朱磊磊, 朱冰, 管佳佳, 骆杰, 杭群, 傅军. 血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化在原发性胃癌中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 288-292.

Leilei Zhu, Bing Zhu, Jiajia Guan, Jie Luo, Qun Hang, Jun Fu. Detection value of the promoter methylation of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 genes in primary gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 288-292.

目的

通过测定胃癌患者血浆中细胞内游离DNA中PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子的甲基化情况,分析它们与胃癌疾病特征间的联系,并探讨三种基因启动子甲基化在筛查原发性胃癌中的协同检测功能。

方法

利用巢氏甲基化特异性PCR技术(MDA-nMSP)检测2020年12月至2021年12月收治的81例胃癌患者(胃癌组)血液样本中的PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子的甲基化率。另选取同期年龄构成相似的39名健康者作为对照组,比较两组各基因甲基化率的差异,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估血浆甲基化PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1对胃癌的预测价值。

结果

胃癌组血浆PAX5、SEPT9及WIF-1甲基化率分别为38.3%、34.6%、46.9%,高于对照组的7.7%、10.3%、5.1%,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=12.123、7.956、20.683,均P<0.01)。PAX5和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化的发生与患者年龄相关(P<0.05),SEPT9基因启动子甲基化的发生与肿瘤大小相关(P<0.05)。作为诊断靶点,甲基化PAX5诊断胃癌的敏感度为38.27%,特异度为92.31%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.653;SEPT9分别为34.57%、89.74%、0.622,WIF-1分别为46.91%、94.87%、0.709,三者联合诊断胃癌的敏感度、特异度分别为61.73%(95% CI:50.3%~72.3%)、84.62%(95% CI:69.5%~94.1%),AUC为0.732(95% CI:0.653~0.810)。

结论

原发性胃癌患者血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化率较高,三种甲基化基因联合诊断胃癌的特异度与单一基因诊断相似,但敏感度有较大提升,有望成为新的胃癌检测基因组合。

Objective

To determine the methylation of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene promoters in intracellular free DNA in the plasma of gastric cancer (GC) patients, and their relationship with the characteristics of GC, trying to explore the function of promoter methylation of the three genes in screening detection of primary GC.

Methods

The methylation rate of the PAX5, SEPT9, and WIF-1 gene promoters in blood samples from 81 GC patients (GC group) and 39 healthy controls (control group) were measured using the nest methylation-specific PCR technology (MDA-nMSP). The difference of gene methylation rates between the two groups was compared, and the predictive value of plasma methylated PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene in GC were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve.

Results

The methylation rates of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 in GC group were 38.3%, 34.6% and 46.9% respectively, while those in the control group were 7.7%, 10.3%, and 5.1% respectively. There were significant differences in methylation rates of the three genes between the two groups (χ2=12.123, 7.956, 20.683; all P<0.01). The occurrence of PAX5 and WIF-1gene promoter methylation were correlated with patients’ age (P<0.05), and the occurrence of SEPT9 gene promoter methylation was correlated with tumor size (P<0.05). As a diagnostic target of GC, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of methylated PAX5 were 38.27%, 92.31%, and 0.653 respectively; 34.57%, 89.74% and 0.622 respectively for SEPT9; 46.91%, 94.87%, and 0.709 respectively for WIF-1. The sensitivity and specificity of combined diagnosis for GC were 61.73% (95% CI: 50.3%-72.3%), 84.62% (95% CI: 69.5%-94.1%), and AUC value was 0.732 (95% CI: 0.653-0.810).

Conclusions

The methylation rates of PAX5, SEPT9 and WIF-1 gene promoters in plasma of patients with primary GC are high. When the combination of the three genes for diagnosis of GC, the specificity is similar to that by any single gene, but the sensitivity is greatly improved, which is expected to become a new gene combination for GC detection.

表1 基因引物序列表
图1 PAX5、SEPT9、WIF-1基因MDA-nMSP产物凝胶电泳图 marker:DNA marker;a、b、c分别为三个随机样本(甲基化、部分甲基化、非甲基化);1和2分别为阳性对照和阴性对照;M:甲基化条带;U:非甲基化条带;A为PAX5基因;B为SEPT9基因;C为WIF-1基因
表2 血浆PAX5、SEPT9和WIF-1基因启动子甲基化状态与胃癌临床病理特征的关系(例)
图2 甲基化基因PAX5、SEPT9、WIF-1单独及联合检测诊断原发性胃癌的受试者工作特征曲线
表3 甲基化基因PAX5、SEPT9及WIF-1单独和联合检测诊断原发性胃癌的效能
[1]
Liu D, Li L, Wang L, et al. Recognition of DNA methylation molecular features for diagnosis and prognosis in gastric cancer[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12: 758926.
[2]
谭智军, 赵玉国, 肖晓艳. 胃癌患者血浆PAX5和RNF180基因甲基化情况及其临床意义[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2021, 35(6): 584-587.
[3]
Li W, Ma X, Wang F, et al. SNHG3 affects gastric cancer development by regulating SEPT9 methylation[J]. J Oncol, 2022, 2022: 3433406.
[4]
Zhou Y, Li Z, Ding Y, et al. Promoter methylation of WNT inhibitory factor-1 may be associated with the pathogenesis of multiple human tumors[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2018, 14(Supplement): S381-S387.
[5]
Dai X, Ren T, Zhang Y, et al. Methylation multiplicity and its clinical values in cancer[J]. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2021, 23: e2.
[6]
Yang B, Wang JQ, Tan Y, et al. RNA methylation and cancer treatment[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2021, 174: 105937.
[7]
孙昌裕. 血浆PAX5、RNF180、PCDH10基因启动子甲基化检测在胃癌中的意义[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2017.
[8]
Jin L, Ma X, Lei X, et al. Cyclophosphamide inhibits Pax5 methylation to regulate the growth of retinoblastoma via the Notch1 pathway[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2021, 40(12_suppl): S497-S508.
[9]
Zhao L, Li S, Gan L, et al. Paired box 5 is a frequently methylated lung cancer tumour suppressor gene interfering β-catenin signalling and GADD45G expression[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2016, 20(5): 842-854.
[10]
Palmisano WA, Crume KP, Grimes MJ, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of the transcription factor genes PAX5 alpha and beta in human cancers[J]. Cancer Res, 2003, 63(15): 4620-4625.
[11]
余智操, 吴晋, 张琼, 等. SEPT 9基因与恶性肿瘤关系的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2018, 26(2): 297-301.
[12]
Liu SG, Luo GP, Qu YB, et al. Indirubin inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway via promoter demethylation of WIF-1[J]. BMC Complement Med Ther, 2020, 20(1): 250.
[13]
Guo Y, Guo W, Chen Z, et al. Hypermethylation and aberrant expression of Wnt-antagonist family genes in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma[J]. Neoplasma, 2011, 58(2): 110-117.
[14]
Kasztura M, Richard A, Bempong NE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: A scoping review[J]. Int J Public Health, 2019, 64(9): 1261-1271.
[1] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[11] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[12] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[13] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[14] 孙晗, 于冰, 武侠, 周熙朗. 基于循环肿瘤DNA 甲基化的结直肠癌筛查预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 500-506.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要