切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 413 -421. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.06.003

论著

急性肠系膜静脉血栓形成致透壁性肠坏死的临床危险因素分析
黄应雄, 叶子, 蒋鹏, 詹红, 姚陈, 崔冀()   
  1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院急诊科
    510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院血管外科
    510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-25 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 崔冀
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2023101); 广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2022A1515012457)

Clinical risk factors for transmural intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric venous thrombosis

Yingxiong Huang, Zi Ye, Peng Jiang, Hong Zhan, Chen Yao, Ji Cui()   

  1. Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2023-08-25 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ji Cui
引用本文:

黄应雄, 叶子, 蒋鹏, 詹红, 姚陈, 崔冀. 急性肠系膜静脉血栓形成致透壁性肠坏死的临床危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 413-421.

Yingxiong Huang, Zi Ye, Peng Jiang, Hong Zhan, Chen Yao, Ji Cui. Clinical risk factors for transmural intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric venous thrombosis[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 413-421.

目的

探讨急性肠系膜静脉血栓形成(MVT)致透壁性肠坏死(TIN)的临床危险因素,并建立预测模型。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2017年12月中山大学附属第一医院经急诊收治最终诊断为急性MVT的患者102例。根据肠切除术后的病理观察及随访结果,将患者分为TIN组(35例)和非TIN组(67例)。收集并比较两组患者的临床症状、生命体征、腹部体征、急诊首次实验室检查及CT等临床资料,采用多因素Logistic回归分析急性MVT致TIN的临床危险因素,应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价危险因素预测TIN的价值。

结果

102例急性MVT患者中,男性77例(75.5%),年龄(42.9±14.9)岁,中位随访时间40(3~84)个月。41例于首次入院后行剖腹探查,其中40例(39.21%)行肠切除术,术后病理分析31例发生TIN,9例为小肠黏膜及黏膜下坏死;剩余61例于首次入院后行非手术治疗,其中2例因广泛肠坏死无法行肠切除病死,2例在3个月的随访期内因发生肠坏死行肠切除术。62例(60.8%)存在MVT的继发性病因。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,血白细胞(WBC)计数>14.87×109/L(OR=10.574, 95% CI:1.762~63.468;P=0.010)、凝血酶时间(TT) ≤15.9 s (OR=7.880, 95% CI:1.302~47.696;P=0.025)、CT显示中量腹腔积液(OR=11.730, 95% CI:1.747~78.753;P=0.011)为急性MVT致TIN的独立危险因素。存在0、1、2和3个独立危险因素的急性MVT患者发生TIN的风险分别为0、4.76%、54.55%和100.00%,依据危险因素建立预测模型,其对急性MVT致TIN的预测性能较高,ROC曲线下面积为0.928(95% CI:0.848~0.974)。

结论

WBC>14.87×109/L、TT≤15.9 s和CT显示中量腹腔积液,是急性MVT患者发生TIN的独立危险因素。密切监测这些危险因素可以避免不必要的手术和肠切除,减少TIN进行手术治疗的延误。

Objective

To investigate clinical risk factors for transmural intestinal necrosis (TIN) in acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) and establish a predictive model for TIN.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out in 102 consecutive patients admitted to Department of Emergency in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University with diagnosis of acute MVT during January 2010 and December 2017. These patients were divided into TIN group (35 cases) and non-TIN group (67 cases) based on histopathologic examination of the resected bowel intraoperatively and clinical follow-up. Clinical data including symptoms, vital signs, abdominal physical examination, laboratory results and CT investigations at admission were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for TIN of acute MVT, and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to assess the prediction value of the risk factors for TIN.

Results

Of the 102 patients with acute MVT, there were 77 males (75.5%), with a age of (42.9±14.9) years old, and the median follow-up period was 40 months (ranging from 3 to 84 months). A total of 41 patients experienced exploratory laparotomy during first hospitalization and 40 (39.21%) of them underwent intestinal resection, whereas only 31 patients were diagnosed with TIN by histopathologic examination of the resected bowel, and the rest 9 patients were identified to have mucosal necrosis without TIN. 61 patients received conservative treatment during first hospitalization, 2 of whom were unable to undergo surgery as the extensive intestinal necrosis and died soon, whereas 2 patients failed to respond to anticoagulation therapy and underwent intestinal resection within 3 months of follow-up period. A total of 62 patients (60.8%) were found to have secondary etiologies. Multivariable analysis using binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the significant independent predictors for TIN in patients with acute MVT were WBC count >14.87×109/L (OR=10.574, 95% CI: 1.762-63.468; P=0.010), TT≤ 15.9 s (OR=7.880, 95% CI: 1.302-47.696; P=0.025) and a medium amount of ascites on CT scan (OR=11.730, 95% CI: 1.747-78.753; P=0.011). The rate of TIN in patients with acute MVT with no predictive factor were 0, 4.76%, 54.55% and 100.00% in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 factors, respectively. The predictive model according to these risk factors revealed an excellent predictive performance with an area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of TIN in patients with acute MVT was 0.928 (95% CI: 0.848-0.974).

Conclusions

WBC count >14.87×109/L, TT≤15.9 s and a medium amount of ascites on CT scan are the significantly independent predictors for TIN in patients with MVT. Close monitoring of these risk factors may help avoid unnecessary surgery and bowel resection, and reduce the delayed operative treatment of TIN.

图1 CT示急性肠系膜上静脉血栓形成并透壁性肠坏死的典型征象 A为冠状位静脉期显示肠系膜上静脉管腔增粗,腔内呈低密度充盈缺损(红色箭头),为SMVT。B为小肠肠腔扩张(五角星),最宽约43 mm,并肠腔内液气平面形成腹腔中量积液(三角星);C为部分肠壁内可见小类圆形积气影(白色箭头);D为肠壁水肿、增厚,强化程度较同层面正常肠壁减低并呈分层样强化(蓝色箭头),且肠周渗出明显可见积液包绕(四角星)
图2 手术标本组织病理学改变(苏木精-伊红染色) A为不可逆的透壁性肠坏死(×10),存在全层凝固性出血坏死;B为不可逆透壁性肠坏死(×100),累及大部分肌层或肌层全层断裂(黑色箭头);C为可逆性肠缺血(×10),黏膜及黏膜下坏死;D为可逆性肠缺血(×100),肌层结构连续性未被破坏(蓝色箭头)
表1 102例急性MVT患者基线资料的比较
临床因素 总体(102例) TIN组(35例) 非TIN组(67例) 统计值 P
年龄(岁)a 42.9±14.9 41.6±15.2 43.5±14.8 -0.612 0.542
男性b 77(75.5) 28(80.0) 49(73.1) 0.586 0.444
合并症/既往史b          
高血压 7(6.9) 4(11.4) 3(4.5) 0.820 0.365
糖尿病 6(5.9) 0(0) 6(9.0) 1.909 0.167
血脂异常 4(3.9) 0(0) 4(6.0) 0.879 0.348
脑梗死 2(2.0) 0(0) 2(3.0) - 0.545
恶性肿瘤 3(2.9) 2(5.7) 1(1.5) 0.337 0.561
颅内静脉窦血栓形成史 2(2.0) 0(0) 2(3.0) - 0.545
门静脉系统血栓形成史 3(2.9) 1(2.9) 2(3.0) <0.001 1.000
既往肺栓塞史 6(5.9) 0(0) 6(9.0) 1.909 0.167
既往下肢DVT史 15(14.7) 9(25.7) 6(9.0) 5.148 0.023
下肢静脉炎 5(4.9) 5(14.3) 0(0) 7.234 0.007
风湿免疫疾病 5(4.9) 0(0) 5(7.5) 1.379 0.240
血液系统疾病 2(2.0) 1(2.9) 1(1.5) - 1.000
乙肝病史 17(16.7) 3(8.6) 14(20.9) 2.514 0.113
肝硬化 13(12.7) 3(8.6) 10(14.9) 0.361 0.548
既往腹腔手术史 15(14.7) 0(0) 15(22.4) 9.187 0.002
胰腺炎史 3(2.9) 0(0) 3(4.5) 0.427 0.513
妊娠相关 3(2.9) 1(2.9) 2(3.0) <0.001 1.000
口服激素史 2(2.0) 1(2.9) 1(1.5) - 1.000
口服避孕药史 1(1.0) 0(0) 1(1.5) - 1.000
原发性MVTb 40(39.2) 14(40.0) 26(38.8) 0.014 0.907
发病时间(d) a 7.5±4.8 7.8±4.3 7.3±5.0 0.472 0.638
临床症状b          
发热 31(30.4) 13(34.3) 18(26.7) 2.278 0.131
腹胀 72(70.6) 25(71.4) 47(70.1) 0.018 0.893
呕吐 36(35.3) 17(48.6) 19(28.4) 4.113 0.043
腹痛 94(92.2) 32(91.4) 62(92.5) <0.001 1.000
腹痛进行性加重 47(46.1) 20(57.1) 27(40.3) 2.625 0.105
消化道出血 33(32.4) 19(54.3) 14(20.9) 11.712 <0.001
入院体征          
脉搏(次/分)c 89(77, 102) 101(85, 140) 84(76, 94) -3.928 <0.001
收缩压(mmHg)a 129±19 131±21 127±18 0.771 0.443
舒张压(mmHg)a 80±13 82±13 80±13 0.729 0.468
腹膜刺激征b 53(52.0) 30(85.7) 23(34.3) 24.320 <0.001
肠梗阻b 39(38.2) 23(65.7) 16(23.9) 17.037 <0.001
表2 两组患者急诊首次实验室生物学标志物比较
表3 危险因素对疑诊TIN患者的诊断性能及界值
表4 两组患者本院急诊首次CT征象比较
表5 80例急性MVT致TIN早期诊断的单因素Logistic分析[例(%)]
表6 急性MVT致TIN的多因素Logistic回归分析
图3 危险因素个数预测急性MVT致TIN的ROC曲线
表7 危险因素对急性MVT患者中TIN的诊断价值
[1]
Acosta S, Ogren M, Sternby NH, et al. Mesenteric venous thrombosis with transmural intestinal infarction: A population-based study[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 41(1): 59-63.
[2]
Kumar S, Sarr M G, Kamath PS. Mesenteric venous thrombosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345(23): 1683-1688.
[3]
Acosta S, Alhadad A, Svensson P, et al. Epidemiology, risk and prognostic factors in mesenteric venous thrombosis[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(10): 1245-1251.
[4]
Riva N, Donadini MP, Dentali F, et al. Clinical approach to splanchnic vein thrombosis: risk factors and treatment[J]. Thromb Res, 2012, 130 Suppl 1: S1-S3.
[5]
Brunaud L, Antunes L, Collinet-Adler S, et al. Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis: case for nonoperative management[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 34(4): 673-679.
[6]
Nuzzo A, Maggiori L, Ronot M, et al. Predictive factors of intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric ischemia: prospective study from an intestinal stroke center[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017, 112(4): 597-605.
[7]
Corcos O, Castier Y, Sibert A, et al. Effects of a multimodal management strategy for acute mesenteric ischemia on survival and intestinal failure[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 11(2): 158-165.
[8]
Kassahun WT, Schulz T, Richter O, et al. Unchanged high mortality rates from acute occlusive intestinal ischemia: six year review[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2008, 393(2): 163-171.
[9]
Leone M, Bechis C, Baumstarck K, et al. Outcome of acute mesenteric ischemia in the intensive care unit: A retrospective, multicenter study of 780 cases[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41(4): 667-676.
[10]
Piton G, Belon F, Cypriani B, et al. Enterocyte damage in critically ill patients is associated with shock condition and 28-day mortality[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(9): 2169-2176.
[11]
王新宇, 丁威威, 刘宝晨, 等. 急性肠系膜上静脉血栓形成继发透壁性肠坏死的相关因素分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(10): 763-769.
[12]
Emile SH. Predictive factors for intestinal transmural necrosis in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(8): 2364-2372.
[13]
Akyildiz HY, Sozuer E, Uzer H, et al. The length of necrosis and renal insufficiency predict the outcome of acute mesenteric ischemia[J]. Asian J Surg, 2015, 38(1): 28-32.
[14]
刘大方, 叶颖江, 谢启伟, 等. 急性肠系膜血管闭塞性疾病发生肠坏死预测因素的研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(7): 787-791.
[15]
吕和平, 倪海真, 沈传利, 等. D二聚体测定及肠壁厚度测量筛查肠系膜上静脉血栓致肠坏死[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2014, 29(12): 923-926.
[16]
王之, 王康, 赵泽华, 等. 不同性质腹腔积液CT表现的分析探讨[J]. 放射学实践, 2008, 23(11): 1249-1252.
[17]
Reginelli A, Genovese E, Cappabianca S, et al. Intestinal ischemia: US-CT findings correlations[J]. Crit Ultrasound J, 2013, 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S7.
[18]
Lee SS, Ha HK, Park SH, et al. Usefulness of computed tomography in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia of the small intestine in patients with acute mesenteric venous thrombosis[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2008, 32(5): 730-737.
[1] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[2] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[3] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[4] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[5] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[6] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[7] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[8] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[9] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[12] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[15] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?