切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 96 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2025.02.004

论著

肝圆韧带全程包裹肝门区动脉在预防腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后肝门区动脉性出血中的应用体会
王勇1,2, 金浩1,2, 陈石磊1, 胡小四1, 周帅1, 朱超1, 庞青1,2, 潘洪涛1, 刘会春1,2,()   
  1. 1. 230041 合肥,安徽省第二人民医院肝胆胰外科
    2. 233004 蚌埠医学院第一附属医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-13 出版日期:2025-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘会春
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省教育厅重点项目(KJ2021A1267)

Experience of wrapping the hepatic portal artery via ligamentum teres hepatis in the prevention of portal arterial hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Yong Wang1,2, Hao Jin1,2, Shilei Chen1, Xiaosi Hu1, Shuai Zhou1, Chao Zhu1, Qing Pang1,2, Hongtao Pan1, Huichun Liu1,2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Anhui No.2 Provincial People's Hospital, Hefei 230041, China
    2. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
  • Received:2024-08-13 Published:2025-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Huichun Liu
引用本文:

王勇, 金浩, 陈石磊, 胡小四, 周帅, 朱超, 庞青, 潘洪涛, 刘会春. 肝圆韧带全程包裹肝门区动脉在预防腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后肝门区动脉性出血中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 96-100.

Yong Wang, Hao Jin, Shilei Chen, Xiaosi Hu, Shuai Zhou, Chao Zhu, Qing Pang, Hongtao Pan, Huichun Liu. Experience of wrapping the hepatic portal artery via ligamentum teres hepatis in the prevention of portal arterial hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 96-100.

目的

探索肝圆韧带(LTH)全程包裹肝门区动脉在预防腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)后肝门区动脉性出血中的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2019年9月至2024年6月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院和安徽省第二人民医院行LPD的127例患者资料,根据是否采用LTH全程包裹肝门区动脉技术分为包裹组(75例)和非包裹组(52例),比较两组患者的围手术期情况。

结果

两组患者术前的基线资料差异无统计学意义。包裹组患者的手术时间为306 (270~356) min,略长于非包裹组[300(290~330)min],差异无统计学意义(Z=0.823,P=0.411)。包裹组术后未发生肝门区动脉性出血,非包裹组5例术后发生肝门区动脉性出血(胃十二指肠动脉4例,肝总动脉1例),差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.180,P=0.023)。

结论

LTH全程包裹肝门区动脉在LPD中安全易行,可有效预防术后肝门区动脉性出血,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of the technique of wrapping the hepatic portal artery via the ligamentum teres hepatis in the prevention of hepatic portal arterial hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

Methods

The data of 127 patients who underwent LPD from September 2019 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the wrapped group (75 patients) and the non-wrapped group (52 patients). The perioperative data of the two groups were compared to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this technique.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups. The operative time in the wrapped group was 306 (270-356) min,which was slightly longer than [300 (290-330) min]in the non-wrapped group, and the difference was not statistically significant (Z=0.823, P=0.411). There was no portal arterial hemorrhage in the wrapped group, while there were 5 cases of portal arterial hemorrhage (4 cases of gastroduodenal artery, 1 case of common hepatic artery) in the non-wrapped group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=5.180,P=0.023).

Conclusion

It is safe and feasible to wrap the hepatic portal artery in LPD by ligamentum teres hepatis, which can effectively prevent the incidence of hepatic portal arterial hemorrhage after LPD and is worthy of clinical promotion.

图1 肝圆韧带全程包裹肝门区动脉操作流程图 A:自足侧向头侧完整游离LTH与壁腹膜之间粘连;B:游离LTH与肝脏脏面之间粘连组织;C:LTH由肝门区动脉后方自右向左拖至动脉左上方;D:自胃右动脉残端上缘位置对拢缝合一针;E:自腹侧向背侧贯穿缝合胰腺上缘并收紧缝线封闭胰肠吻合口上方和肝总动脉之间间隙;F:包裹后效果图。GDA:胃十二指肠动脉;PHA:肝固有动脉;CHA:肝总动脉;RGA:胃右动脉;LTH:肝圆韧带
表1 两组行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者的术前资料比较
项目 非包裹组 (52 例) 包裹组(75 例) 统计值 P
年龄(岁) 63.0 (54.3~68.5) 65.00(54.0~72.0) Z=-0.927 0.354
体质指数(kg/m2 21.3 (19.8~22.8) 21.3 (19.5~24.2) Z=-0.333 0.739
丙氨酸转氨酶(U/L) 99.0 (41.5~158.0) 70.0 (22.5~192.0) Z=-1.059 0.290
天冬氨酸转氨酶(U/L) 70(42~159) 48 (24~119) Z=-1.899 0.058
γ-谷氨酸转移酶(U/L) 446.5 (179.0~655.8) 262.0 (43.0~678.5) Z=-1.618 0.106
总胆红素(μmol/L) 78.5 (28.5~140.8) 29.9 (13.9~149.6) Z=-1.900 0.057
白蛋白(g/L) 37.9 (35.2~39.8) 37.0 (35.1~39.01) Z=-1.145 0.252
凝血酶原时间(s) 10.8 (10.4~11.3) 11.0 (10.4~11.4) Z=-0.860 0.389
白细胞计数(×109/L) 5.8 (4.7~7.6) 5.5 (4.6~6.9) Z=-0.934 0.350
血红蛋白(×1012/L) 120.5 ± 17.3 119.3 ± 18.4 t=0.370 0.712
性别a χ 2=0.353 0.552
20 (38.5) 25 (33.3)
32 (61.5) 50 (66.7)
腹部手术史a χ 2=0.254 0.614
36 (69.2) 55 (73.3)
16 (30.8) 20 (26.7)
术前减黄a χ 2=0.224 0.636
42 (80.8) 63 (84.0)
10 (19.2) 12 (16.0)
术前Child-Pugh分级a χ 2=1.467 0.226
A 20 (38.5) 37 (49.3)
B 32 (61.5) 38 (50.7)
合并高血压a χ 2=0.234 0.628
39 (75.0) 59 (78.7)
13 (25.0) 16 (21.3)
合并糖尿病a χ 2=0.024 0.877
46 (88.5) 67 (89.3)
6 (11.5) 8 (10.7)
合并COPDa χ 2=0.028 0.868
48 (92.3) 71 (94.7)
4 (7.7) 4 (5.3)
表2 两组行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者术中资料比较
表3 两组行腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者术后资料比较
[1]
冯道夫, 李琪, 沙元朴, 等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术疗效与安全性的单中心回顾性分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022,31(3): 295-303.
[2]
耿小平. 关于开展腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的一些思考[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(1): 90-92.
[3]
金浩, 刘会春, 王勇, 等. 完全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中“洪氏一针法”联合“陈氏缝合技术”的临床应用体会[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2021, 48(13): 670-674.
[4]
谭晓开, 陈宏泽, 李乐, 等. 伴临床相关性胰瘘的胰十二指肠切除术后出血临床特征与诊治分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020, 40(2): 208-213.
[5]
Raza SS, Nutu A, Powell-Brett S, et al. Early postoperative risk stratification in patients with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surgery, 2023, 173(2): 492-500.
[6]
Wang JG, Lei K, You K, et al. Wrapping pancreaticojejunostomy using the ligamentum teres hepatis during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis[J].World J Surg Oncol, 2023, 21(1): 356.
[7]
Klimopoulos S, Charakopoulou A, Pantelis A, et al. Embedment of the gastroduodenal artery stump into the jejunal serosa: A new technique aiming to prevent post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage[J]. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol, 2019, 26(4): e32-e36.
[8]
张树彬, 周新博, 胡子轩, 等. 肝左外叶及左尾状叶包裹胃十二指肠动脉残端预防腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后出血的初步研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(2): 145-149.
[9]
Lee JS, Yoon YC, Hong TH, et al. Hepatic artery protection using a polyglycolic acid sheet during pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multicenter study[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2023, 30(12):1343-1350.
[10]
Wu Y, Dai J, Shen J, et al. Complete embolisation of the proper hepatic artery for delayed haemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report[J]. J Int Med Res, 2020,48(10): 1220760768.
[11]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery, 2017,161(3): 584-591.
[12]
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying(DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J].Surgery, 2007, 142(5): 761-768.
[13]
Schuh F, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, et al. A simple classification of pancreatic duct size and texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2023, 277(3): e597-e608.
[14]
张成, 安东均, 王羊, 等. 胰肠吻合方式对腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘发生率的影响[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021,27(8): 610-613.
[15]
Mussle B, Zuhlke L, Wierick A, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without prophylactic falciform ligament wrap around the gastroduodenal artery stump for prevention of pancreatectomy hemorrhage[J]. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 222.
[16]
Yu Z, Wu X, Zhou X, et al. Ligamentum teres hepatis wrapping of the gastroduodenal artery stump for protection in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center experience[J]. J Int Med Res, 2023, 51(8): 655718080.
[17]
Huang L, Jiang B, Lai J, et al. Efficacy of the two-parts wrapping technique in reducing postoperative complications in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(8): 4731-4744.
[18]
Andreasi V, Partelli S, Crippa S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of omental or falciform ligament wrapping during pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2020,22(9): 1227-1239.
[19]
Welsch T, Mussle B, Korn S, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without prophylactic falciform ligament wrap around the hepatic artery for prevention of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage:randomized clinical trial (PANDA trial)[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 109(1):37-45.
[20]
Martin WT, Bonds M, Fischer L, et al. Learning curve of a laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy program at a second institution[J]. Am Surg, 2024, 90(6): 1582-1590.
[21]
Xu C, Yang X, Luo X, et al. “Wrapping the gastroduodenal artery stump” during pancreatoduodenectomy reduced the stump hemorrhage incidence after operation[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2014,26(3): 299-308.
[22]
Hu XS, Wang Y, Pan HT, et al. “Five steps four quadrants”modularized en bloc dissection technique for accessing hepatic hilum lymph nodes in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].World J Gastrointest Surg, 2024, 16(2): 503-510.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[3] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[4] 杨培容, 潘刚, 周春霞. 胰腺癌术后胰瘘的危险因素及治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 228-230.
[5] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[6] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[7] 史成宇, 季晓琳, 田莉莹, 张来香. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中第14c/d组淋巴结清扫在胰头癌中的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 430-433.
[8] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[9] 李昂, 商福超, 石鑫, 徐晨, 李凤山. 全内脏反位腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治联合门静脉切除重建术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 62-64.
[10] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 腹腔镜肝脏尾状叶切除术中国专家共识(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 1-7.
[11] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 腹腔镜脾部分切除术中国专家共识(2024 版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 8-14.
[12] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[13] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[14] 王冬澳, 林超, 鄂长勇. 胰腺术后出血原因及诊治策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 472-480.
[15] 张畅, 周昆明, 黄桢雅, 孙鸿儒, 蔺宏伟. 符合脐解剖的经脐横行小切口在单孔腹腔镜减重手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 46-52.
阅读次数
全文


摘要