Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01): 62-67. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2011.01.019

Special Issue:

• Evidence-based Version • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Interventional treatmeant for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Wen-zhe FAN1, Jia-ping LI1,(), Jian-yong YANG1, Yu WANG1, Xian-hong XIANG1, He-ping LI1   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2010-08-29 Online:2011-02-01 Published:2011-02-01
  • Contact: Jia-ping LI
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: LI Jia-ping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the therapeutic effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation(RFA) to TACE or RFA alone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UHCC).

Methods

All data of patients with UHCC underwent TACE+RFA versus TACE or RFA in randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCT) were collected from literature by electronic searching. Meta-analysis that recommended was done for the data of 8 researches enrolled in criteria by using RevMan 4.2 software in this study. Objects were survival and rate of complete tumor necrosis.

Results

TACE+RFA group had a statistically higher rate in 1-, 2-, 3-year survival compared with that of TACE group (all P<0.01). It also had a higher rate in 1-, 2-year survival than RFA group (P=0.03, P<0.01), but not in 3-year survival (P=0.16). As to the rate of complete tumor necrosis, combined therapy was better than either monotherapy (both P<0.01).

Conclusions

The local efficacy of TACE plus RFA for UHCC is better than either monotherapy. As to the prospective efficacy combined therapy can elevate the patients’ survival rate compared with that of TACE alone and prolong patients’ 1-, 2-year survival time compared with that of RFA alone. But there is no statistic different in 3-year patients’ survival rate when TACE plus RFA compared to RFA alone.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE, RFA.

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd