Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2011, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06): 524-529. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2011.06.15

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

3.0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer diagnosing and researching with pathology

Ying-ming CHEN1, Xiao-zhao ZHUANG2, Shen-ping YU1,(), Ji CUI3, Chuang-qi CHEN3, Xiao-juan ZHAO1, Bi-tao PAN1, Zi-ping LI1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 510080 Guangzhou, China
  • Received:2011-09-08 Online:2011-12-01 Published:2011-12-01
  • Contact: Shen-ping YU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: YU Shen-ping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) at 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) for diagnosing rectal cancer, and analyze the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and pathological results of tumor.

Methods

The study included 42 patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative routine MRI + DWI examination and were treated by rectal cancer dissection, and then obtained pathological results. ADC values of tumors and normal rectal walls were measured respectively, and statistical analysis was made.

Results

(1) The ADC values of total 42 patients of rectal primary tumors and normal rectal wall were (0.76 ± 0.11) × 10-3 mm2/s and (1.22 ± 0.16) × 10-3 mm2/s respectively. The ADC value of rectal cancer was statistically significant different from that of the normal rectal wall tissue (t = 15.439, P <0.001). The optimal cutoff ADC value in differentiating rectal cancer from normal rectal wall was (0.96 × 10-3) mm2/s, representing 95.2% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. (2) The ADC values of one case of well differentiated, 33 cases of moderately differentiated and 5 cases of poorly differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma were 0.78 × 10-3 mm2/s, (0.75 ± 0.12) × 10-3 mm2/s and (0.77 ± 0.11) × 10-3 mm2/s respectively. There was no statistically difference between moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma in ADC value (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

3.0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging can improve the tumor detection rate of rectal cancer. The ADC value of primary tumor is significantly lower than the normal rectal wall, and there is no statistically difference between different degrees of differentiation of rectal adenocarcinoma in ADC value.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Apparent diffusion coefficient

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd