Prognosis of early breast cancer sentinel lymph node negative patients with axillary lymphadenec-tomy

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.01.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the prognosis of early breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) treated only by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and SLNB plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of early breast cancer patients in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2010 with negative SLN (only SLNB in 241 cases and SLNB+ALND in 220 cases) was carried out. According to the clinical and pathological data, we compared postop-erative complications and long-term prognosis in the two groups.

Results

The average postoperative hos-pital stay of NALND group and ALND group was (5.2±1.3) d and (8.1±1.8) d (t=1.450, P=0.003), respec-tively, upper extremity with abnormal sensation after resection was 3.7% (9/241) and 73.2% (161/220) (χ²=283.239, P<0.000 1), and upper limb edema was 0 (0/241) and 10.9% (24/220) (χ²=7.735, P<0.000 1), and the differences were statistically significant. 5-year disease free survival rates of two groups were 95.4% and 95.5% (χ²=0.231, P=0.902).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing only SLNB without ALND has less trauma and less postoperative complications than ALND in early breast cancer of negative SLN, and the long-term efficacy is comparable to ALND. We propose it is not necessary to carry out ALND for early breast cancer patients with negative SLN.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Lymph node excision, Prognosis

Yunlong Zeng, Jun Li. Prognosis of early breast cancer sentinel lymph node negative patients with axillary lymphadenec-tomy[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 10(01): 36-39.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhptwkxwx.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.01.005

https://zhptwkxwx.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V10/I01/36

Figures/Tables 3

References 10

1	Ann S,Emi Y,Annouschka L, et al. Is the sentinel lymph node biopsy more sensitive for the identification of positive lymph nodes in breast cancer than the axillary lymph node dissection?[J]. SpringerPlus, 2013, 23(2): 275.
2	Giuliano AE,Hunt KK,Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(6): 569-575.
3	Fisher B,Jeong JH,Anderson S, et al. Twenty-five-year follow-up of randomized comparing radical mastestomy, total mastecto-my and total mastectomy followed by irradiation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(8): 567-575.
4	Krag DN,Anderson SJ,Julian TB, et al. Sentinel lymph node re-section compared with conventional axillary lymph node dissec-tion in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: over-all survival findings from NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(10): 927-933.
5	Langer I,Guller U,Hsu-Schmitz SF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved survival compared to level Ⅰ&Ⅱ axillary lymph node dissection in node negative breast can-cer patients[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35(8): 805-813.
6	Martin RC,Edwards MJ,Wong SL, et al. Practical guidelines for optimal gamma probe detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: results of a multi-institutional study. For the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Study Group[J]. Surgery, 2015, 128(2): 139-144.
7	Takei H,Kurosumi M,Yoshida T, et al. Axillary lymph node dis-section can be avoided in women with breast cancer with intraop-erative, false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies[J]. Breast Cancer, 2010, 17(1): 9-16.
8	Atif AH,Naveen F,Amna K, et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for the detection of Asian breast cancer micrometastasis-experience from Pakistan[J]. Asian Pacif-ic J Cancer Prev, 2013, 14 (4): 2657-2662.
9	Tvedskov TF. Staging of women with breast cancer after introduc-tion of sentinel node guided axillary dissection[J]. Dan Med J, 2012, 59(7): B4475.
10	Pernas S, Gil M, Benítez A, Bajen MT, et al. Avoiding axillary treatment in sentinel lymph node micrometastases of breast can-cer: a prospective analysis of axillary or distant recurrence[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(3): 772-777.

特征变量		NALND组(241例)	ALND组(220例)	统计值	P值
年龄（ ± s，岁）		58.2±6.1	57.9±5.6	1.134	0.977
临床分期［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	Ⅰ期	131(54.4)	118(53.6)	0.024	0.877
?	Ⅱ期	110(45.6)	102(46.4)	0.024	0.877
组织学分类［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	导管内癌	80(33.2)	71(32.3)	?	?
?	浸润性导管癌	86(35.7)	69(31.4)	0.930	0.335
?	浸润性乳头状癌	72(34.0)	74(33.6)	0.930	0.335
?	黏液癌	3(1.2)	6(2.7)	?	?
手术方式［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	保乳术	90(37.3)	73(33.2)	0.872	0.350
?	改良根治术	151(62.7)	147(66.8)	0.872	0.350
ER状态［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	阳性	180(74.7)	165(75.0)	0.006	0.939
?	阴性	61(25.3)	55(25.0)	0.006	0.939

特征变量		NALND组(241例)	ALND组(220例)	统计值	P值
年龄（ ± s，岁）		58.2±6.1	57.9±5.6	1.134	0.977
临床分期［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	Ⅰ期	131(54.4)	118(53.6)	0.024	0.877
?	Ⅱ期	110(45.6)	102(46.4)	0.024	0.877
组织学分类［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	导管内癌	80(33.2)	71(32.3)	?	?
?	浸润性导管癌	86(35.7)	69(31.4)	0.930	0.335
?	浸润性乳头状癌	72(34.0)	74(33.6)	0.930	0.335
?	黏液癌	3(1.2)	6(2.7)	?	?
手术方式［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	保乳术	90(37.3)	73(33.2)	0.872	0.350
?	改良根治术	151(62.7)	147(66.8)	0.872	0.350
ER状态［例(%)］		?	?	?	?
?	阳性	180(74.7)	165(75.0)	0.006	0.939
?	阴性	61(25.3)	55(25.0)	0.006	0.939

预后指标	NALDN组(241例)	ALND组(220例)	χ²值	P值
局部复发	5(2.1)	3(1.4)	0.340	0.560
远处转移	7(2.9)	7(3.2)	1.223	0.269
复发和（或）转移	11(4.6)	10(4.5)	0.001	0.992

预后指标	NALDN组(241例)	ALND组(220例)	χ²值	P值
局部复发	5(2.1)	3(1.4)	0.340	0.560
远处转移	7(2.9)	7(3.2)	1.223	0.269
复发和（或）转移	11(4.6)	10(4.5)	0.001	0.992

[1]	Yaping Jia, Shu'e Zeng. Ultrasound and pathological characteristics of breast metaplastic carcinoma containing squamous cell carcinoma components [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2]	Yuezhou Li, Kongxi Zhang, Xiaohong Li, Zhonghua Shang. Prognostic significance of PUM in gastric carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3]	Jun Zhang, Zai Luo, Mingyu Duan, Zhengjun Qiu, Chen Huang. Research progress of prognostic prediction models for gastric cancer [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4]	Qian Yang, Cuifang Li, Wanqiu Zhang. Analysis of short-term and long-term prognosis and influencing factors of primary liver cancer with spontaneous ruptured hemorrhage after emergency TACE surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5]	Yansong Li, Huimin Feng, Mingchao Liu, Zepeng Liu, Qiuxia Jiang. Expression and clinical significance of STIP1 in triple negative breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6]	Zhenjian Jiang, Ming Jiang, Dali Huang. The expression and prognostic value of TK1 and Ki67 proteins in differentiated thyroid carcinoma [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7]	Qingyan Yan, Xiaomei Yong, Hong Luo, Min Du. Prognostic factors and survival analysis of multicenter elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8]	Zhiming Li, Chenming Guo, Xiaochen Zhuang, Xueqin Hou, Junxi Gao. Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative indicators of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[9]	Xin Lu, Jiayi Xu, Yang Liu, Qin Yang, Wenwen Ju, Yinglong Xu. Comparison of the effects of early LC and PTCD continuous LC on liver function and prognosis of patients with acute cholecystitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[10]	Ming Jiang, Rui Luo, Chengchao Long. Diagnosis and treatment of obturator hernia: An experience of 73 cases over 10 years [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[11]	Yanjun Lu, Jian Ma, Pengyu Bai, Linghong Guo, Haiyi Liu, Bo Jiang, Wenqi Bai, Yixun Zhang. Clinical effect of Nano-carbon on 253 groups of lymph node dissection in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[12]	Guangjun Zhong, Chunhua Liu, Wansen Zhu, Xiaolei Xu, Zhaojun Wang. Application of conventional MRI combined with different scanning sequences in preoperative staging diagnosis, chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[13]	Yongsheng Li, Jiahe Sun, Shuwei Guo, Yikang Lu, Hongzhou Liu. Short-term postoperative complications and their influencing factors in elderly patients with colorectal cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14]	Jun Wang, Kunpeng Liu, Lan Yao, Hua Zhang, Yue Wei, Libin Suo, Jun Chen, chengli Miao, Chenghua Luo. Retrospective analysis of anesthesia management of massive transfusion patients undergoing retroperitoneal tumor resection [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15]	Libin Suo, Kunpeng Liu, Lan Yao, Hua Zhang, Yue Wei, Jun Wang, Jun Chen, Chengli Miao, Chenghua Luo. Key points of anesthesia management and prognostic factors in patients undergoing primary retroperitoneal paraganglioma resection [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export