To compare the effect of areola edge arc incision, submammary fold inci-sion, and anterior axillary fold incision in the treatment of breast tumor, and to explore clinical value for nice chest incision.

Eighty cases with breast tumor treated in our hospital from January 2013 to February 2015 were selected in the study, then according to paired grouping method they were divided into two groups with 40 cases in each group. The control group adopted the traditional radial incision while observation group adopted breast incision surgical treatment, implementation of areola edge arc inci-sion, submammary fold incision, and anterior axillary fold incision according to the location and size of the tu-mor. General operation data and postoperative scar between two groups were compared.

There was no significant difference in operation time and bleeding volume between the two groups [(35.4±11.3) min vs (36.9±12.1) min, (25.6±12.5) ml vs (27.8±14.5) ml, P>0.05]. The observation group had 27 cases (67.5%) of mild scar, 13 cases (32.5%) of moderate, and 0 cases of severe scar; with no significant differ-ence of control group (χ²=4.698, P=0.09). The satisfaction degree of the observation group was signifi-cantly better than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=6.598, P=0.01). There was no significant difference in complication between the two groups (χ²=1.013, P=0.31).

Nice chest incision in the treatment of breast cancer has better effect, the degree of scar is lighter and it has higher degree of satisfaction in patients, so it has important clinical value.