Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05): 372-376. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2019.05.009

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of prophylactic ileostomy on laparoscopic radical sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer

Bin Cai1, Tingliang Zhou1, Dujun Jiang1, Yue Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, XuzhouCancer Hospital, Xuzhou 221002, China
  • Received:2018-07-20 Online:2019-10-01 Published:2019-10-01
  • Contact: Yue Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yue, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect of prophylactic ileostomy on inflammatory indexes, prealbumin and anal function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with laparoscopic low rectal cancer radical anal sphincter surgery who were treated in Xuzhou Cancer Hospital from September 2010 to June 2012 were randomly divided into control group (conventional method) and observation group (preventive ileu-endostomy), with 48 cases in each group. The perioperative indicators were compared. The effects of anal function between 0.5-12 months after surgery and complications were recorded, and survival rate by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Compared with the control group, the levels of prealbumin in the observation group increased, and CRP and WBC decreased at the 5th day after operation (t=9.236, 8.335, 9.164, all P<0.05). The resting anal pressure, maximal anal systolic pressure and maximal rectal tolerance volume in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 6, 9 and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The first anal exhaust time, defecation recovery time, hospitalization time and incidence of complications in the observation group were less than those in the control group (t=6.323, 5.913, 6.135, χ2=7.529, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 5-year survival rates, progression-free survival time and mean survival time between the two groups (χ2=0.349, P=0.560; t=2.475, 1.616, P=0.450, 0.329).

Conclusion

Prophylactic distal ileostomy can reduce the inflammatory reaction in patients with laparoscopic low rectal cancer with radical sphincter preserving surgery and significantly improve the anal function of patients.

Key words: Ileostomy, Rectal neoplasms, Laparoscopes, Anus-saving operation

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd