Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 189-194. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.03.006

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Eiffcacy of diffusion kurtosis MR imaging for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from benign hepatic nodules

Zedi Huang1, Meng Wang2, Bingqi Shen2,(), Sicong Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Central Hospital of Baoan District, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518102, China
    2. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2020-02-25 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-01
  • Contact: Bingqi Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Bingqi, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other benign hepatic nodules.

Methods

According to the pathological results, 150 hepatic nodules of 112 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were divided into two groups: benign group (26 of focal nodular hyperplasia, 24 of hemangioma, 6 of hepatocellular adenoma) and malignant group (94 of HCC). Preoperative MRI examinations including DKI (b values: 0, 50, 200, 400, 800 and 2 000 s/mm2) were performed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and DKI-derived parameters such as diffusivity values (D), kurtosis values (K) were analyzed by Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate their efficacy for distinguishing HCC from benign hepatic nodules.

Results

The median (interquartile range) values of ADC, D and K of malignant group were 1.172(0.389)×10-3 mm2/s, 1.751(0.759)×10-3 mm2/s, and 0.013(0.315), while those of benign group were 1.670(0.675)×10-3 mm2/s, 2.510(1.186)×10-3 mm2/s and 0.162(0.223), respectively. There were statistically significant differences in ADC, D and K between the two groups(all P<0.001). The area under the curve of ADC, D, and K to identify HCC and liver benign nodules were 0.815, 0.779, and 0.722, and the optimal cut-off values were 1.238×10-3 mm2/s, 1.881×10-3 mm2/s, 0.056, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 87.5%, 59.6%, 76.7% (ADC) ; 83.9%, 62.8%, 76.0% (D); 75.0%, 60.6%, 70.0% (K), respectively.

Conclusions

DKI parameter values D, K and conventional DWI parameter value ADC can be used to distinguish HCC from focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma and hepatocellular adenoma. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ADC are higher than D and K.

Key words: Focal nodular hyperplasia, Liver neoplasms, Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, Apparent diffusion codfficient, Diffusivity values, Kurtosis values

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd