Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 214-217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2020.03.012

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of low-dose dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for sedation in pediatric outpatient MRI

Jinghui Chen1, Xinhe Liu2, Shangyi Jin3, Gaofeng Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China
    3. Department of Cardiology, Lingnan Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-01
  • Contact: Gaofeng Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Gaofeng, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the clinical application of low-dose dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for sedation in pediatric outpatient MRI.

Methods

From January 2019 to March 2019, three hundred children who needed sedation for outpatient MRI in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center were randomly divided into three groups: chloral hydrate sedation group (group H, oral take 10% chloral hydrate sedation), propofol sedation group (group P, propofol iv), and low-dose dexmedetomidine combined with propofol sedation group (group DP, dexmedetomidine 0.3 μg/kg iv + propofol iv), 100 cases in each group. The success rate of sedation, sedation effect, incidence of vomiting, agitation and respiratory inhibition were compared among the three groups.

Results

The sedation success rate of group P and group DP was significantly higher than that of group H (χ2=18.560, P<0.001), while the incidence of vomiting and agitation was significantly lower (χ2=54.224, 17.023; P<0.001, 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of respiratory depression and the number of cases requiring respiratory support among the three groups (χ2=1.049, 1.798; P=0.591, 0.407). The number of cases requiring propofol was significantly less in group DP than in group P during the sedation (χ2=67.520, P<0.001).The sedation onset time and recovery time and discharge time of group P and group DP were significantly shorter than those of group H (F=634.100, 243.800, 42.930, all P<0.001).

Conclusion

Low-dose dexmedetomidine combined with propofol intravenous sedation for MRI examination in pediatric outpatient clinics has such advantages as fast onset, fewer adverse reactions, high safety, quick recovery, and can be widely used in pediatric sedation.

Key words: Child, Conscious sedation, Nuclear magnetic resonance, biomolecular, Dexme-detomidine, Propofol

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd