Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04): 262-266. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2023.04.005

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of different treatment methods for bile duct injury after cholecystectomy

Yasenjiang Gulimila, Aierken Ayinuer, Jialong Li, Qiang Guo, Tiemin Jiang, Aji Tuerganaili()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Hydatidosis, Digestive Vascular Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia,Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2023-02-06 Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-18
  • Contact: Aji Tuerganaili

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of different treatment methods for the same classification of iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out including the clinical data of 34 patients with Ⅱ 1 type IBDI admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from October 2017 to February 2022. The patients were divided into the endoscopic group (13 cases) and the surgical group (21 cases) according to different treatment methods. The hospitalization days, hospitalization expenses, laboratory examination indicators before and after surgery, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, postoperative complications, and follow-up after discharge were compared between the two groups.

Results

The total bilirubin and direct bilirubin levels in the endoscopic group on the first day after surgery were lower than those in the surgical group, and the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization days, and hospitalization expenses were lower than those in the surgical group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in repair timing between the two groups (χ2=0.095, P>0.05). The patients were followed up for 33.2 (6.4-67.7) months, with a follow-up effective rate of 97.1%. Among the short-term complications, 9 patients with Clavien-Dindo≥Ⅲ were in the surgical group. Follow-up effect Terblanche rating: in the endoscopic group, 9 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was poor; in the surgical group, 16 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 2 cases were poor. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term efficacy between the two groups (χ2=0.051, P>0.05).

Conclusions

The treatment of Ⅱ 1 type IBDI may be determined based on the specific situation of the injury. Endoscopic therapy has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, short operation time, and rapid postoperative recovery. However, long-term and repeated stent replacement increases treatment costs, hospital stays, and complications. Surgical treatment is still the first choice when bile duct transection and vascular injury are immediately detected during IBDI surgery.

Key words: Iatrogenic bile duct injury, Endoscopic treatment, Surgical treatment, Cholecystectomy

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd