Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01): 43-45. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2010.01.112

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of propofol and remifentanil for conscious sedation during breast biopsy surgery

Hui ZHANG1,(), Hai JIANG2, Ying XIAO1, Lu YANG1, Kang-qing XU1, Wen-qi HUANG1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2009-03-11 Online:2010-02-01 Published:2010-02-01
  • Contact: Hui ZHANG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: ZHANG Hui, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the sedation effects of propol and remifentanil during breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care(MAC).

Methods

Forty patients undergoing single-lateral breast biopsy were randomly assigned to propofol group and remifentanil group, with 20 patients in each group. In propofol group, and infusion was initiated 2 mg·kg-1·h-1, then decreased to 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 5 minutes later before operation, and maintained 2 mg·kg-1·h-1 during operation. In remifentanil group, and infusion was initiated 0.1 μg·kg-1·min, then decreased to 0.05μg·kg-1·min-1 until end of procedure. The pain was evaluated with a ten-point visual analogue scale(VAS) and the sedation was evaluated with OAA/S scale during local anesthetic infiltration and deep tissue dissection. The awake time after operation(OAA/S score was 5), the pain scores 30min after operation and any postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

The pain scores and sedation scores were similar between two groups. Seven patients in remifentanil group and one patient in propofol group experienced a decline in respiratory rate lower than 8 bpm(P<0.05), but correction was rapid following verbal instruction.

Conclusion

Both propofol and remifentanil provide good sedation druing breast biopsy under monitored anesthesia care, but remifentanil decrease respiratory rate significantly.

Key words: Propofol, Remifentanil, Conscious sedation

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd