Risk factors for pleural effusion after pericardial devascularization: clinical analysis of 12 cases

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.04.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the risk factors for pleural effusion and the corresponding prophylactico-therapeutic measures after pericardial devascularization in patients with portal hypertension.

Methods

Seventy-seven cases with portal hypertension after hepatitis undergoing pericardial devascularization in the Third Department of General Surgery in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from Mar 2008 to Sep 2012 were selected for a retrospective study.

Results

In these 77 patients, 7 cases(9.1%) accepted nonselective splenic embolism before operation. The types of operation were divided into two groups, 70 cases(90.9%) accepted splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization without esophageal transection, the other 7 cases(9.1%) were given modified Sugiura operation. All patients recovered after operation with an average hospitalization time of (16.7±2.2) days. There was no death or second operation in these 77 cases. Pleural effusion emerged in 12 cases(15.6%) after the operation. By using single factor analysis, the pleural effusion after pericardial devascularization was related to the types of operation, hepatic Child-Pugh classification and nonselective splenic embolism before operation, and to the size of spleen, spleen adhesions around. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). By using multiple factors logistic regression analysis, the type of operation and the nonselective splenic embolism before operation were the independent factors of pleural effusion (P<0.05).

Conculsion

Through avoiding nonselective splenic embolism before operation, selecting appropriate operation type and improving operational skills, we can reduce the occurrence of pleural effusion after pericardial devascularization.

Key words: Pericardial devascularization, Sugiura, Pleural effusion

Genglong Zhu, Dong Chen, Yonghui Su, Yingbin Jia, Nanrenqing Suo, Xiaodong Guan, Xiaopeng Hong, Baimeng Zhang. Risk factors for pleural effusion after pericardial devascularization: clinical analysis of 12 cases[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2014, 08(04): 294-297.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhptwkxwx.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.04.010

https://zhptwkxwx.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2014/V08/I04/294

Figures/Tables 2

References 10

[1]	洪德飞,郑雪咏,彭淑牖, 等. 完全腹腔镜巨脾联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2007, 87(12): 820-822.
[2]	王殿臣,詹一丁,贾守仁, 等. 门奇断流术后肝性胸水原因分析[J]. 实用外科杂志, 1998, 6(7): 362.
[3]	刘星伟,李坚,蔡潮农, 等. 门脉侧支循环状态与肝硬化门脉高压的术式选择[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2011, 5(3): 227-229.
[4]	裘法祖,杨镇. 外科手术在门静脉高压症治疗中的地位和趋势[J]. 外科理论与实践, 1999, 4(2): 65-66.
[5]	李新丰,王高雄,黄天丛, 等. 改良式断流术联合脾肾分流术治疗门静脉高压上消化道出血的疗效评价[[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版, 2013, 7(1): 17-20.
[6]	冷希圣. 门静脉高压症治疗的现状与展望[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2013, 20(1): 1-3.
[7]	钱小星,吴茂松,陈克辉, 等. PSE联合手术治疗门脉高压症合并脾功能亢进的临床研究[J]. 安徽医学, 2012, 33(2): 152-154.
[8]	鲁东,吕维富. 部分性脾栓塞术的临床应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2008, 8(3): 279-281.
[9]	郑进方,王海东,邢贻雷, 等. 右肝癌切除术后胸腔积液的防治[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2001, 21(8): 490-491.
[10]	Jones PW,Moyers JP,Rogers JT, et al. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method?[J]. Chest, 2003, 123(2): 418-423.

影响因素		例数	并发胸腔积液	无胸腔积液	χ²值	P值
性别		?	?	?	?	?
?	男	60	9	51	0.071	1.000
?	女	17	3	14	0.071	1.000
年龄（岁）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<50	40	5	35	0.602	0.438
?	≥50	37	7	30	0.602	0.438
Child-Pugh分级		?	?	?	?	?
?	A	60	6	54	6.442	0.020^a
?	B	17	6	11	6.442	0.020^a
手术时间（min）		?	?	?	?	?
?	≤180	27	2	25	2.113	0.197
?	>180	50	10	40	2.113	0.197
手术失血量（ml）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<500	35	5	30	0.082	0.774
?	≥500	42	7	35	0.082	0.774
脾肿大程度		?	?	?	?	?
?	轻	18	7	11	?	?
?	中	52	4	48	9.902	0.015^b
?	重	7	1	6	?	?
术前吸烟		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	39	3	36	3.741	0.053
?	有	38	9	29	3.741	0.053
术前血小板数（×10⁹/L）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<50	9	2	7	0.341	0.625
?	≥50	68	10	58	0.341	0.625
离断食管		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	70	7	63	18.253	0.001^c
?	有	7	5	2	18.253	0.001^c
脾周粘连		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	68	7	61	12.377	0.004^d
?	有	9	5	4	12.377	0.004^d
术前行脾动脉栓塞		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	70	8	62	10.109	0.010^e
?	有	7	4	3	10.109	0.010^e
急诊手术		?	?	?	?	?
?	否	65	10	55	0.013	1.000
?	是	12	2	10	0.013	1.000

影响因素		例数	并发胸腔积液	无胸腔积液	χ²值	P值
性别		?	?	?	?	?
?	男	60	9	51	0.071	1.000
?	女	17	3	14	0.071	1.000
年龄（岁）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<50	40	5	35	0.602	0.438
?	≥50	37	7	30	0.602	0.438
Child-Pugh分级		?	?	?	?	?
?	A	60	6	54	6.442	0.020^a
?	B	17	6	11	6.442	0.020^a
手术时间（min）		?	?	?	?	?
?	≤180	27	2	25	2.113	0.197
?	>180	50	10	40	2.113	0.197
手术失血量（ml）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<500	35	5	30	0.082	0.774
?	≥500	42	7	35	0.082	0.774
脾肿大程度		?	?	?	?	?
?	轻	18	7	11	?	?
?	中	52	4	48	9.902	0.015^b
?	重	7	1	6	?	?
术前吸烟		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	39	3	36	3.741	0.053
?	有	38	9	29	3.741	0.053
术前血小板数（×10⁹/L）		?	?	?	?	?
?	<50	9	2	7	0.341	0.625
?	≥50	68	10	58	0.341	0.625
离断食管		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	70	7	63	18.253	0.001^c
?	有	7	5	2	18.253	0.001^c
脾周粘连		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	68	7	61	12.377	0.004^d
?	有	9	5	4	12.377	0.004^d
术前行脾动脉栓塞		?	?	?	?	?
?	无	70	8	62	10.109	0.010^e
?	有	7	4	3	10.109	0.010^e
急诊手术		?	?	?	?	?
?	否	65	10	55	0.013	1.000
?	是	12	2	10	0.013	1.000

因素	B	标准误（SE）	Wald	P值	相对危险度（OR）	95%可信区间（95% CI）
性别	-2.406	2.275	1.119	0.290	0.090	0.001~7.787
年龄	-0.096	1.574	0.004	0.951	0.908	0.042~19.866
Child-Pugh分级	-0.135	1.567	0.007	0.931	0.874	0.040~18.860
手术时间	2.666	2.450	1.184	0.276	14.381	0.118~1749.727
手术失血量	-0.981	1.309	0.562	0.454	0.375	0.029~4.880
脾肿大程度1	?	?	0.215	0.898	?	?
脾肿大程度2	1.365	3.590	0.144	0.704	3.914	0.003~4454.051
脾肿大程度3	0.818	3.575	0.052	0.819	2.265	0.002~2498.718
术前吸烟	0.913	1.614	0.320	0.571	2.492	0.105~58.898
术前血小板数值	2.330	2.127	1.201	0.273	10.279	0.159~663.961
手术方式	4.527	2.040	4.925	0.026^a	92.453	1.697~5037.641
脾周粘连	3.512	2.509	1.959	0.162	33.514	0.245~4583.141
术前脾动脉栓塞	5.337	2.540	4.413	0.036^b	207.833	1.430~30201.980
急诊手术	-1.132	2.384	0.225	0.635	0.323	0.003~34.519

因素	B	标准误（SE）	Wald	P值	相对危险度（OR）	95%可信区间（95% CI）
性别	-2.406	2.275	1.119	0.290	0.090	0.001~7.787
年龄	-0.096	1.574	0.004	0.951	0.908	0.042~19.866
Child-Pugh分级	-0.135	1.567	0.007	0.931	0.874	0.040~18.860
手术时间	2.666	2.450	1.184	0.276	14.381	0.118~1749.727
手术失血量	-0.981	1.309	0.562	0.454	0.375	0.029~4.880
脾肿大程度1	?	?	0.215	0.898	?	?
脾肿大程度2	1.365	3.590	0.144	0.704	3.914	0.003~4454.051
脾肿大程度3	0.818	3.575	0.052	0.819	2.265	0.002~2498.718
术前吸烟	0.913	1.614	0.320	0.571	2.492	0.105~58.898
术前血小板数值	2.330	2.127	1.201	0.273	10.279	0.159~663.961
手术方式	4.527	2.040	4.925	0.026^a	92.453	1.697~5037.641
脾周粘连	3.512	2.509	1.959	0.162	33.514	0.245~4583.141
术前脾动脉栓塞	5.337	2.540	4.413	0.036^b	207.833	1.430~30201.980
急诊手术	-1.132	2.384	0.225	0.635	0.323	0.003~34.519

[1]	Liantu He, Qing Tang, Haixing Liao, Xinghua Zhou, Yingshan Li, Yi Hu, Minxuan Tang, Yuxin Zhang, Wuxi Chen, Dongjun Wei. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound guided urokinase injection for precise treatment of encapsulated pleural effusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(11): 1250-1255.
[2]	Shiyuan Liu, Feng Zhao, Qian Li, Danjie Zhang, Zhenchuan Ma, Jiantao Jiang, Shaomin Li. Vacuum negative pressure drainage of pleural effusion by ultrasound-guided thoracentesis and central venous catheterization [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(12): 1241-1245.
[3]	Xia Zhang, Libo Wang, Shengzheng Wu, Cong Feng, Dongdong Wu, Faqin Lyu, Tanshi Li. Diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax by ultrasonography: an experimental study [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(12): 967-971.
[4]	Yiting Du, Rong Ju, Sheng Yang, Biao Li, Shuqiang Gao. Clinical values of lung ultrasound in diagnosis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in full-term infants [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(02): 198-204.
[5]	Hansheng Wang, Xiao Chen, Hui You, Liu Yan, Tao Ren, Meifang Wang. Clinical analysis of exudative pleural effusion caused by paragonimus infection in 6 patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 348-353.
[6]	Mei Yang, Chun Zhou, Aihong Zhao, Qin Wang. Construction of a risk nomograph model for plastic bronchitis caused by refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children [J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 274-281.
[7]	Xueyi Gong, Xiaofeng Zhu, Zemin Hu, Qian Wang. Risk factor analysis of the persistent pleural effusion for thoracocentesis treatment after liver transplantion [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 446-449.
[8]	Yu Wang, Ke Dong. Clinical analysis of modified laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for patients with cirrhosis complicated with portal hypertension [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 65-68.
[9]	Qing Liu, Yunchao Wang, Tongyi Men, Huayu Gao, Jianning Wang. A case of acute pancreatitis complicated with pleural effusion and allergic purpura after donation after cardiac death kidney transplantation [J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 52-54.
[10]	Zhongzhong Chen, Jiachang Liu, Xingxiang Xu, Lingfeng Min. Diagnosis value of medical thoracoscopy combine with rapid on-site evaluation in undiagnosed pleural effusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 14(02): 135-140.
[11]	Zhoufei Wang, Zihan Xu, Guangkuo Zhu, Wenlei Zhuo, Zhengtang Chen. Clinical analysis of intrapleural therapy with endostar or cisplatin for primary lung cancer mediated malignant pleural effusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 12(05): 539-543.
[12]	Shigeng Chen, Mingjun Liang, Jiao Guan, Zunqiang Zhou, Guangwen Zhou. Comparison of application of three ligation methods in pericardial devascularization [J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 599-603.
[13]	Qiucheng Cai, Siyi Cai, Qing Ruan, Fang Yang, Yi Jiang. Effect of preoperative devascularization and impact of gastrointestinal hemorrhage on the efficacy of liver transplantation for cirrhotic portal hypertension patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(06): 493-496.
[14]	Professional Committee on Tumor Metastasis of Shaanxi Province Anticancer Association, Professional Committee on Rare Tumors of Shaanxi Province Anticancer Association: Expert Alliance for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malignant Serous Effusion. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of malignant serous effusion in Shaanxi Province (2021 version) [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 1-16.
[15]	Qiang Wang, Huan Zhang, Jun Pan. Significance of tumor markers in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion in elderly patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(04): 16-21.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export