Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2014, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05): 399-401. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2014.05.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy vs open splenectomy

Yonghui Bi1,(), Shaowei Sun1, Xinxing Lin2   

  1. 1. Weihai Municipal Hospital, Weihai 264200, China
  • Received:2014-03-11 Online:2014-10-01 Published:2014-10-01
  • Contact: Yonghui Bi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Bi Yonghui, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy.

Methods

Clinical parameters of twelve cases treated with laparoscopic splenectomy and another twelve with open splenectomy were enrolled from July 2011 to July 2013. The clinical parameters such as operative time, blood loss, fasting time, postoperative wound pain scores, postoperative hospital stay were analyzed statistically.

Results

Compared to the open surgery group, splenectomy group had shorter operation time [(170±9.7) min vs (89±4.4) min, t=24.087], postoperative fasting time[(40±8.4) h vs (68±5.8) h, t=8.558], and postoperative hospital stay[(7.3±0.8) d vs (13.2±0.9) d, t=-15.122]. VAS on postoperative day 1 and day 3 of splenectomy group were both significantly less than the other group [ (3.1±0.8) vs (5.5±0.5) , t=8.813; (1.2±0.4) vs (2.7±0.5) , t=8.115] (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a better choice for the patients, with less trauma, less pain, and lower rate of complications.

Key words: Splenectomy, Laparoscopic, Prognosis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd