Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06): 393-396. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2016.06.002

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on MACBAR of sevoflurane in children

Qian Zhou1, Yan Wu2, Chanyan Huang2, Qiwen Deng2, Yuxin Qiu2, Cai Li3,()   

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Epidemiological Research Office, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    3. Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2015-12-15 Online:2016-12-01 Published:2016-12-01
  • Contact: Cai Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Cai, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To observe the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane to blockade adrenergic response to surgical incision in 50% of children (MACBAR).

Methods

Eighty-one children, 2-6 years old, with ASAⅠ or Ⅱ undergoing lower abdominal surgery, were randomly allocated into three groups, receiving saline only (27 cases) or a bolus dose of 0.5 μg/kg and maintenance dose of 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 Dex (27 cases) or a bolus dose of 1 μg/kg and maintenance dose of 1 μg·kg-1·h-1 Dex (27 cases) before induction. The initial concentration of sevoflurane was 4% for each group after intubation. The "modified up-and-down" method (Sympathetic responses to surgical incision was considered positive if the MAP or HR increased≥15%) was used, and the MACBAR of sevoflurane and its 95% confidence interval were calculated.

Results

The differences in the three groups were significant (P<0.01). The MACBAR of sevoflurane was respectively (3.95±0.1)% (95%CI=3.88%-4.02%) in group D0, (3.05±0.1)% (95% CI=2.98%-3.12%) in group D0.5, and (1.90±0.0)% (95% CI=1.90%-1.90%) in group D1. The MACBAR reduction of sevoflurane was 23% in group D0.5 and 52% in group D1 (P<0.01).

Conclusions

A bolus dose of 0.5 μg/kg and maintenance dose of 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine results in a 23% decrease in the MACBAR of sevoflurane. Increasing the dose of dexmedetomidine to 1 μg/kg and 1 μg·kg-1·h-1 produces a further 29% decrease in the MACBAR values of sevoflurane.

Key words: Pediatrics, Sevoflurane, Dexmedetomidine, Minimum alveolar concentration

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd