结直肠癌术前机械性肠道准备的可行性分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.05.012

目的

探讨结直肠癌患者术前不实施机械性肠道准备（MBP）的可行性。

方法

前瞻性选择2016年9月至2018年1月攀枝花市中心医院收治的结直肠癌患者104例，采用随机数字表法分为非机械性肠道准备组（non-MBP组）53例和机械性肠道准备组（MBP组）51例。观察两组术后并发症的发生和机体应激反应指标的变化。

结果

两组术前的hs-CRP、IL-6、Cor水平差异无统计学意义；non-MBP组术后24、48 h时的IL-6、Cor及hs-CRP水平均显著低于同期MBP组，差异有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。监测术后30 d并发症，两组患者均未发生腹腔感染，吻合口漏、切口感染、术野冲洗液细菌培养、术后肠梗阻的发生率比较，差异无统计学意义。non-MBP组患者球杆菌比例失调、腹泻的发生率分别为7.5%（4/53）、5.6%（3/53），显著低于MBP组的23.5%（12/51）、15.6%（8/51），差异有统计学意义（χ²=4.367、8.341，P=0.037、0.009）。

结论

术前MBP会加重结直肠癌患者术后机体的应激反应，结直肠癌择期手术术前可不行MBP，并不增加术后并发症的发生。

关键词: 结直肠肿瘤, 机械性肠道准备, 应激反应

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of non preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for the colorectal cancer resection.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on one hundred and four patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted to the Central Hospital of Panzhihua City from September 2016 to January 2018. They were divided into non-MBP group (53 cases) and MBP group (51 cases) using random number table method. The incidence of postoperative complications and the changes of stress response in both groups were observed.

Results

There were no significant differences in the levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and Cor before operation between the two groups. The levels of IL-6, Cor and hs-CRP at postoperative 24 and 48 h in the non-MBP group were significantly lower than those of the MBP group in the same period, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). No intra-abdominal infection occurred in both groups. No significant differences were found in the postoperative complications of 30 d including wound infection rate, anastomotic leakage rate, early postoperative bowel obstruction rate and bacterial culture of surgical area rinse solution. The incidence of bacillus/coccus ratio imbalance and diarrhea in non-MBP group were 7.5% (4/53) and 5.6% (3/53) respectively, which were significantly lower than 23.5% (12/51) and 15.6% (8/51) in MBP group, the differences were statistically significant (χ²=4.367, 8.341; P=0.037, 0.009).

Conclusions

Preoperative MBP can aggravate postoperative stress response in patients with colorectal cancer, which is not necessary for elective surgery. Non-MBP does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: Colorectal neoplasms, Mechanical bowel preparation, Stress response

表1 两组结直肠癌患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	性别(男/女,例)	年龄(岁, ±s)	TNM分期(例)			ASA评分(例)			术前CEA(μg/L，例)		术前CA19-9(kU/L，例)
组别	例数	性别(男/女,例)	年龄(岁, ±s)	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	≤5	>5	≤37	>37
non-MBP组	53	31/22	56.29±10.47	22	26	5	2	32	19	45	8	48	5
MBP组	51	28/23	54.67±11.28	20	28	3	3	26	22	42	9	47	4
统计值	?	0.213	0.616^a	0.618			0.731			2.174		2.629
P值	?	0.507	0.473	0.607			0.854			0.926		0.905
组别	合并疾病(例)					肿瘤部位(例)				吻合方式(例)
组别	糖尿病	冠心病	慢性阻塞性肺病	高血压	肝病	升结肠	横结肠	降结肠	直肠	回-结肠	结肠-结肠	结肠-直肠	Miles术
non-MBP组	6	1	2	7	2	10	5	11	27	10	16	25	2
MBP组	4	2	3	9	1	12	3	12	24	12	15	22	2
χ²值	0.426					0.461				0.648
P值	0.619					0.714				0.928

表1 两组结直肠癌患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	性别(男/女,例)	年龄(岁, ±s)	TNM分期(例)			ASA评分(例)			术前CEA(μg/L，例)		术前CA19-9(kU/L，例)
组别	例数	性别(男/女,例)	年龄(岁, ±s)	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	≤5	>5	≤37	>37
non-MBP组	53	31/22	56.29±10.47	22	26	5	2	32	19	45	8	48	5
MBP组	51	28/23	54.67±11.28	20	28	3	3	26	22	42	9	47	4
统计值	?	0.213	0.616^a	0.618			0.731			2.174		2.629
P值	?	0.507	0.473	0.607			0.854			0.926		0.905
组别	合并疾病(例)					肿瘤部位(例)				吻合方式(例)
组别	糖尿病	冠心病	慢性阻塞性肺病	高血压	肝病	升结肠	横结肠	降结肠	直肠	回-结肠	结肠-结肠	结肠-直肠	Miles术
non-MBP组	6	1	2	7	2	10	5	11	27	10	16	25	2
MBP组	4	2	3	9	1	12	3	12	24	12	15	22	2
χ²值	0.426					0.461				0.648
P值	0.619					0.714				0.928

表2 两组结直肠癌患者手术前后机体应激反应指标水平比较（±s）

组别	例数	IL-6(ng/L)			Cor(μg/L)			hs-CRP(mg/L)
组别	例数	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h
non-MBP组	53	3.74±1.25	5.28±1.72	5.36±1.32	171.4±30.8	247.8±34.3	238.3±30.7	0.74±0.37	5.79±0.68	5.27±0.53
MBP组	51	3.52±1.46	8.94±2.18	7.61±1.47	173.1±31.6	368.1±37.9	342.5±32.6	0.79±0.25	9.43±1.45	8.64±1.86
t值	?	0.637	2.374	2.638	1.482	2.547	2.645	-0.705	3.486	3.419
P值	?	0.508	0.013	0.004	0.169	0.016	0.008	0.416	0.001	0.002

表2 两组结直肠癌患者手术前后机体应激反应指标水平比较（±s）

组别	例数	IL-6(ng/L)			Cor(μg/L)			hs-CRP(mg/L)
组别	例数	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h	术前4 d	术后24 h	术后48 h
non-MBP组	53	3.74±1.25	5.28±1.72	5.36±1.32	171.4±30.8	247.8±34.3	238.3±30.7	0.74±0.37	5.79±0.68	5.27±0.53
MBP组	51	3.52±1.46	8.94±2.18	7.61±1.47	173.1±31.6	368.1±37.9	342.5±32.6	0.79±0.25	9.43±1.45	8.64±1.86
t值	?	0.637	2.374	2.638	1.482	2.547	2.645	-0.705	3.486	3.419
P值	?	0.508	0.013	0.004	0.169	0.016	0.008	0.416	0.001	0.002

表3 两组结直肠癌患者术后并发症情况比较［例(%)］

组别	例数	吻合口漏	切口感染	术野冲洗液细菌阳性	球杆菌比例失调	腹泻	术后早期肠梗阻
non-MBP组	53	1(1.8)	2(3.7)	5(9.4)	4(7.5)	3(5.6)	1(1.8)
MBP组	51	0(0)	3(5.8)	7(13.7)	12(23.5)	8(15.6)	0(0)
χ²值	?	-	0.184	0.215	4.367	8.341	-
P值	?	0.153	0.209	0.418	0.037	0.009	0.153^a

表3 两组结直肠癌患者术后并发症情况比较［例(%)］

组别	例数	吻合口漏	切口感染	术野冲洗液细菌阳性	球杆菌比例失调	腹泻	术后早期肠梗阻
non-MBP组	53	1(1.8)	2(3.7)	5(9.4)	4(7.5)	3(5.6)	1(1.8)
MBP组	51	0(0)	3(5.8)	7(13.7)	12(23.5)	8(15.6)	0(0)
χ²值	?	-	0.184	0.215	4.367	8.341	-
P值	?	0.153	0.209	0.418	0.037	0.009	0.153^a

[1]	陈孝平，汪建平. 外科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013: 406.
[2]	Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, et al. Nationwide analysis of outcomes of bowel preparation in colon surgery[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015,220(5):912-920.
[3]	Ji WB, Hahn KY, Kwak JM, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation does not affect clinical severity of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery[J]. World J Surg, 2017,41(5):1366-1374.
[4]	胡艳杰，李卡，李立, 等. 术前机械性肠道准备对结肠癌患者早期康复疗效的影响：随机对照试验[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2017,37(1):13-17.
[5]	Allaix ME, Arolfo S, Degiuli M, et al. Laparoscopic colon resection: to prep or not to prep? Analysis of 1 535 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016,30(6):2523-2529.
[6]	王云飞，宋延安，杨维勇, 等. 传统与快速肠道准备方法对结直肠癌术后肠道微生态的影响[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2017,32(7):1195-1198.
[7]	Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, et al. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2015,262(3):416-425.
[8]	Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS^®) Society recommendations[J]. Clin Nutr, 2012,31(6):801-816.
[9]	Alfonsi P, Slim K, Chauvin M, et al. French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery[J]. J Visc Surg, 2014,151(1):65-79.
[10]	中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会加速康复外科协作组. 结直肠手术应用加速康复外科中国专家共识（2015版）[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献（电子版）, 2015,9(5):335-337.
[11]	Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011,(9):CD001544.
[12]	Ikehara K, Endo S, Kumamoto K, et al. Positive detection of exfoliated colon cancer cells on linear stapler cartridges was associated with depth of tumor invasion and preoperative bowel preparation in colon cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2016,14(1):233.
[13]	李琳，李岩. 肠道菌群失调与功能性腹泻[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2014,23(7):723-726.
[14]	Tyagi A, Bansal A, Das S, et al. Effect of thoracic epidural block on infection-induced inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Crit Care, 2017,38(1):6-12.
[15]	Ding X, Zhang J, Liu D, et al. Serum expression level of IL-6 at the diagnosis time contributes to the long-term prognosis of SCLC patients[J]. J Cancer, 2018,9(5):792-796.
[16]	Vassiliadi DA, Tsagarakis S. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: the role of the decompression test in the diagnosis and follow-up of Cushing's syndrome[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2018,178(5):R201-R214.

[1]	康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2]	代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3]	王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4]	付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[5]	薛永婷, 高峰, 王雅楠, 屈莲平. 溶瘤病毒治疗在结直肠癌中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 380-384.
[6]	武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[7]	唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8]	张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[9]	李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[10]	于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11]	倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[12]	范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[13]	关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14]	顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[15]	邹勇, 顾应江, 丁昊, 杨呈浩, 陈岷辉, 蔡昱. 基于Nrf2/HO-1及NF-κB信号通路探讨葛根素对大鼠脑出血后早期炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 271-277.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Feasibility analysis of colorectal cancer with preoperative mechanical bowel preparation

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Feasibility analysis of colorectal cancer with preoperative mechanical bowel preparation