切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 342 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.05.013

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

改良早期预警评分对腹部闭合性创伤预后的预测价值
孙宏1,(), 鲍华杰1, 汪剑良1   
  1. 1. 241000 安徽省芜湖市第五人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-23 出版日期:2018-10-01
  • 通信作者: 孙宏

Predictive value of modified early warning score for closed abdominal trauma

Hong Sun1,(), Huajie Bao1, Jianliang Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Fifth People’s Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2018-03-23 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Hong, Email:
引用本文:

孙宏, 鲍华杰, 汪剑良. 改良早期预警评分对腹部闭合性创伤预后的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 342-345.

Hong Sun, Huajie Bao, Jianliang Wang. Predictive value of modified early warning score for closed abdominal trauma[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 342-345.

目的

观察改良早期预警评分(MEWS)用于腹部闭合性创伤评估的临床效果。

方法

收集2008年1月至2017年11月芜湖市第五人民医院收治的160例腹部闭合性创伤患者资料,回顾性分析并统计所有患者临床诊治及预后资料,采用MEWS评分系统进行评估,观察患者分诊情况(门诊或专科保守治疗、ICU抢救、中转手术)、治疗过程中并发症发生情况及30 d内预后状况。

结果

160例患者中保守治疗64例(40.0%),入住ICU抢救96例(60.0%);中转手术34例(21.3%)。MEWS评分>8分者16例,均分诊为入住ICU抢救,保守治疗率明显低于其他各分值段(MEWS评分>6~8分除外),入住ICU抢救率明显高于其他各分值段(MEWS评分>6~8分除外),中转手术率明显低于MEWS评分<3分及3~4分值段,上述差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。160例患者30 d内预后良好124例(77.5%),MEWS评分为(2.44±1.32)分;预后不良36例(22.5%),MEWS评分为(6.84±2.12)分,其中死亡12例(7.5%),感染16例(10.0%),多器官衰竭4例(2.5%),应激溃疡4例(2.5%)。ROC曲线分析显示MEWS评分对腹部闭合性创伤患者预后不良有一定预测价值,曲线下面积为0.919(P<0.001,95% CI=0.797~1.000),预测预后不良最佳截断值为5.970分,敏感度0.667,特异度0.986。

结论

采用MEWS预警评分对评估腹部闭合性创伤患者就诊时分诊及预后具有重要作用,减少并发症及死亡率,改善预后。

Objective

To observe the clinical effect of modified early warning score (MEWS) in evaluating closed abdominal trauma.

Methods

From January 2008 to November 2017, one hundred and sixty patients with closed abdominal trauma admitted to the Fifth Peoples Hospital of Wuhu were enrolled. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis data were retrospectively analyzed. The MEWS system was used to evaluate the patients diagnosis (outpatient or specialist conservative treatment, ICU rescue, transfer operation), complications in the course of treatment and 30 days’ prognosis.

Results

Among the 160 patients, 64 cases (40.0%) were treated conservatively, 96 (60.0%) were admitted to ICU, and 34 (21.3%) underwent transfer operation. There were 16 cases with MEWS score >8. The rate of conservative treatment was significantly lower than that of other scores (except of MEWS score >6-8). The rate of rescue in ICU (100.0%) was significantly higher than that in other segments (except of MEWS score >6-8). The conversion rate was significantly lower than the MEWS score <3 and 3-4 segments. The prognosis in 30 d was good in 124 cases (77.5%), the MEWS score was (2.44±1.32), 36 (22.5%) with poor prognosis, and the MEWS score was 6.84±2.12. Twelve cases (7.5%) died, 16 (10.0%) were infected, 4 (2.5%) had multiple organ failure, and 4 cases (2.5%) suffered from stress ulcer. The ROC curve analysis showed that the MEWS score had a certain predictive value for poor prognosis in patients with closed abdominal trauma. Area under the curve was 0.919 (P<0.001, 95% CI=0.797-1.000), the cut-off value was 5.970, the sensitivity was 0.667, and the specificity was 0.986.

Conclusion

MEWS plays an important role in choosing triage protocols and evaluating prognosis of closed abdominal trauma, reducing complications and mortality, and improving the prognosis.

表1 不同MEWS评分下患者分诊情况[例(%)]
表2 不同MEWS评分下患者预后情况[例(%)]
[1]
陶瑞雨,余稳稳,闫开旭, 等. 腹部闭合性损伤的研究进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2017,20(2):166-168.
[2]
Iaselli F, Mazzei MA, Firetto C, et al. Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma: a review[J]. Radiol Med, 2015,120(1):21-32.
[3]
Roney JK, Whitley BE, Maples JC, et al. Modified early warning scoring (MEWS): evaluating the evidence for tool inclusion of sepsis screening criteria and impact on mortality and failure to rescue[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2015,24(23-24):3343-3354.
[4]
Kruisselbrink R, Kwizera A, Crowther M, et al. Modified early warning score (MEWS) identifies critical illness among ward patients in a resource restricted setting in Kampala, Uganda: A prospective observational study[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(3):e0151408.
[5]
吴孟超,吴在德. 黄家驷外科学[M]. 7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 1756-1759.
[6]
Lee LL, Yeung KL, Lo WY, et al. Evaluation of a simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS-28) and the modified early warning score (MEWS) in predicting physiological deterioration during inter-facility transport[J]. Resuscitation, 2008,76(1):47-51.
[7]
Wykes B, Ahmed S, Dubois S, et al. Implementation of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in a community hospital[J]. CHEST, 2015,148(4):485.
[8]
吴玮玲,黎春常. 分级分区管理模式下急诊分诊现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016,31(20):69-71.
[9]
谭云鹤,韦建革,徐育智, 等. 改良早期预警评分在急诊创伤中的应用研究[J]. 广西医学, 2015,37(9):1352-1353.
[10]
冯海丽,廖春燕,陈世娟, 等. 改良早期预警评分与校正改良早期预警评分在全麻术后患者转运中的应用比较[J]. 广东医学, 2015,36(19):3086-3088.
[11]
王莉荔,杜捷夫,陈威, 等. 改良早期预警评分与国家早期预警评分对老年急诊患者病情评估的比较[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015,18(14):1680-1683.
[12]
陈华,刘海华,张晓毳, 等. 改良早期预警评分在评估急诊外科患者病情及预后中的作用[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2015,16(3):189-191.
[13]
唐碧波. MEWS评分法对急诊创伤患者的评估效果[J]. 现代预防医学, 2014,41(4):768-769.
[14]
顾明,付阳阳,李晨, 等. 改良早期预警评分在急诊重症患者早期死亡中的预测价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2015,27(8):687-690.
[15]
卫婷婷,王艳梅,侯铭, 等. 改良早期预警评分用于预测急诊潜在危重病患者预后的探讨[J]. 中国护理管理, 2015,15(2):153-155.
[16]
卢生芳,郭玉刚,李长风, 等. 改良早期预警评分和生理评分系统及危险患者评分对急诊科抢救室患者预后评估的应用价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016,19(12):1414-1419.
[17]
Bilben B, Grandal L, Søvik S. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) as an emergency department predictor of disease severity and 90-day survival in the acutely dyspneic patient-a prospective observational study[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2016,24:80.
[18]
Dundar ZD, Ergin M, Karamercan MA, et al. Modified Early Warning Score and VitalPac Early Warning Score in geriatric patients admitted to emergency department[J]. Eur J Emerg Med, 2016,23(6):406-412.
[1] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[2] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[3] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[4] 范帅华, 郭伟, 郭军. 基于机器学习的决策树算法在血流感染预后预测中应用现状及展望[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 289-293.
[5] 李圣鹏, 方爱蓝, 刘诗宁, 王丹, 刘湘奇. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的预测因素与评估方法[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 441-445.
[6] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 王万川, 麦广智, 张晓槟, 冯家豪. 腹腔镜下LAR术治疗低位直肠癌保肛术中钉仓数量与术后LARS的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 491-496.
[9] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
[12] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要