切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 205 -209. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2022.03.009

论著

肝切除术中不同断肝方式治疗多病灶原发性肝癌的临床效果研究
周保富1,(), 吴乐乐1, 李永红1, 胡世超1   
  1. 1. 237000 六安,安徽医科大学附属六安医院普外科(肝胆外科)
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-28 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 周保富

Effect of different liver cutting methods in hepatectomy for multifocal primary liver cancer

Baofu Zhou1,(), Lele Wu1, Yonghong Li1, Shichao Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery (Hepatobiliary Surgery), Lu’ an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Lu’ an 237000, China
  • Received:2021-10-28 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Baofu Zhou
引用本文:

周保富, 吴乐乐, 李永红, 胡世超. 肝切除术中不同断肝方式治疗多病灶原发性肝癌的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 205-209.

Baofu Zhou, Lele Wu, Yonghong Li, Shichao Hu. Effect of different liver cutting methods in hepatectomy for multifocal primary liver cancer[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 205-209.

目的

探讨肝切除术中不同断肝方式治疗多病灶原发性肝癌的临床效果,分析射频消融术(RFA)辅助断肝治疗多病灶原发性肝癌的优势。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2019年12月于安徽医科大学附属六安医院确诊为多病灶原发性肝癌的156例患者临床资料,其中72例为肝切除术中应用RFA辅助断肝(RFA组),84例采用传统肝切除术(对照组)。观察两组患者手术时间、肝门阻断时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间等手术相关指标;对比两组患者手术前后丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、总胆酸(TBA)及总胆红素(TBIL)等肝功能指标水平,以及术后并发症、术后生存情况。

结果

与对照组相比,RFA组患者的手术时间、肝门阻断时间、术后住院时间显著缩短,术中出血量亦明显减少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前两组患者肝功能指标ALT、AST、AFP、TBA及TBIL水平比较,差异无统计学意义,术后7 d时均显著下降(P<0.05),且RFA组ALT、AST、AFP水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后RFA组并发症发生率为5.56%(4/72),低于对照组的15.48%(χ2=3.930,P=0.047)。对照组患者术后1、3、5年累积总生存率和无病生存率分别为92.85%、64.28%、57.14%和88.10%、58.33%、47.62%;RFA组术后1、3、5年累积生存率和无病生存率分别为100.0%、87.50%、69.44%和95.83%、75.00%、61.11%。两组术后3、5年累积总生存率和1、3、5年累积无病生存率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

在肝切除术中应用RFA辅助断肝,对于治疗多病灶原发性肝癌患者具有出血少、手术并发症发生率低、远期生存率高等优势,可在临床中大力推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of different liver transection methods in hepatectomy for multifocal primary liver cancer, and analyze the advantages of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) assisted liver transection in hepatectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of 156 patients with multifocal primary liver cancer diagnosed in Lu’ an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from January 2014 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 72 cases were treated with RFA assisted liver transection during hepatectomy (RFA group), and 84 cases only underwent hepatectomy as the control group. The operation time, hilar blocking time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay were observed. The levels of liver function indexes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), total cholic acid (TBA) and total bilirubin (TBIL) before and after operation, as well as postoperative complications and postoperative survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the control group, the operation time, hilar blocking time, postoperative hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in RFA group were significantly shorter or less (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of ALT, AST, AFP, TBA and TBIL between the two groups before operation, and the corresponding liver function indexes of all patients were significantly decreased on the 7th day after surgery (P<0.05). In addition, the levels of ALT, AST and AFP in the RFA group after surgery were significantly different from those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in RFA group was 5.56% (4/72), which was lower than 15.48% in the control group (χ2=3.930, P=0.047). The cumulative overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate at 1-, 3- and 5-year were 92.85%, 64.28%, 57.14% and 88.10%, 58.33% and 47.62% in the control group; 100.0%, 87.50%, 69.44%, and 95.83%, 75.00%, and 61.11% in RFA group, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups in the 3-, 5-year cumulative overall survival rate and 1-, 3-, 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate (P<0.05).

Conclusions

RFA assisted liver transection in hepatectomy has the advantages of less bleeding, lower incidence of postoperative complications and higher long-term survival rate for the treatment of paitents with multifocal primary liver cancer. It can be used in the combination with hepatectomy in clinical application and has high promotion value.

表1 两组多病灶原发性肝癌患者一般资料比较
表2 两组多病灶原发性肝癌患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组多病灶原发性肝癌患者手术前后肝功能指标比较(±s
图1 两组多病灶原发性肝癌患者5年累积总生存率和无病生存率比较
[1]
Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: A secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7): 783-791.
[2]
Zheng R, Wei W, Chen W, et al. Liver cancer incidence and mortality in China: temporal trends and projections to 2030[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2018, 30(6): 571-579.
[3]
Chen SW, Xia HX, Fan QQ, et al. Precise hepatectomy in the treatment of patients with primary liver cancer[J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2019, 33(1): 225-230.
[4]
Picchi SG, Lassandro G, Bianco A, et al. RFA of primary and metastatic lung tumors: long-term results[J]. Med Oncol, 2020, 37(5): 35.
[5]
Ye QW, Pang SJ, Yang N, et al. Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (3-5 cm):A propensity score matching cohort study[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(2): 1549-1558.
[6]
郝以杰, 牛哲禹, 卢俊. 循环肿瘤细胞在肝癌中的研究及应用进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2019, 46(13): 690-693.
[7]
Cai J, Zheng J, Xie Y, et al. Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy for treating recurrent liver cancer[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2021, 17(1): 1-6.
[8]
Gavriilidis P, Askari A, Azoulay D. Survival following redo hepatectomy vs radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Hpb, 2017, 19(1): 3-9.
[9]
Lee HW, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2018, 94(2): 74-82.
[10]
Chua DW, Koh YX, Syn NL, et al. Repeat hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: An average treatment effect analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(12): 7731-7740.
[11]
杨海棠, 杨磊, 杨凯歌. 腹腔镜超声辅助射频消融术治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 癌症进展, 2018, 16(5): 619-622.
[12]
Kang TW, Lim HK, Cha DI. Aggressive tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2017, 23(1): 95-101.
[13]
Sandri GB, Werra ED, Masciana G, et al. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, are we going to dismiss the traditional approach?[J]. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg, 2017, 2(34): 1-6.
[14]
Matsumoto M, Yanaga K, Shiba H, et al. Treatment of intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2021, 5(4): 538-552.
[15]
Li B, Qin Y, Qiu Z, et al. A cohort study of hepatectomy-related complications and prediction model for postoperative liver failure after major liver resection in 1,441 patients without obstructive jaundice[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(4): 305-312.
[16]
何建新, 王永波, 何文平, 等. 射频消融术辅助部分肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的效果及复发率随访研究[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2017, 25(2): 126-129.
[17]
李玉民, 马臻, 陈昊. 原发性肝癌射频消融治疗[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 6(5): 337-342.
[18]
Chen CL. Does artificial ascites induce heat sink effect or electricity steal effect in the radiofrequency ablation of superficial liver tumor?[J]. Adv Dig Med, 2019, 6(4): 141-143.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[4] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[5] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[6] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[7] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[8] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[9] 马俊永, 王毅州, 李锡锋, 吴雅丽, 张小峰. 浅谈腹腔镜肝切除术出血防控策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 495-498.
[10] 李双喜, 胡宗凯, 赵静, 黄洁. 肝血管瘤治疗指征及治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 504-510.
[11] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[12] 张海涛, 贾哲, 马超, 张其坤, 武聚山, 郭庆良, 曾道炳, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 手术切除与射频消融治疗血管周围型单发小肝癌临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 523-527.
[13] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要