Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2013, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03): 222-230. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1647-0793.2013.03.015

Special Issue:

• Evidence-based Version • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Meta-analysis of the risk factors for ananstomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer in China

Shi-bang LI1, Mu-lin LIU1,(), Ling-shang KONG1, Zong-bing ZHANG1, Rui-lin LIU1, Cong-qiao JIANG1, Shi-qing LI1, Jie LUO1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, China
  • Received:2012-12-08 Online:2013-06-01 Published:2013-06-01
  • Contact: Mu-lin LIU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: LIU Mu-lin, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for cancer of rectum.

Methods

A Meta analysis was conducted among all the studies published in China from Jun 2002 to Jun 2012.

Results

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 6454 patients. The overall positive rate of anastomotic leakage was 6.79%. The risk of anastomotic leakage was significantly increased in male compared with female (OR=1.79, 95% CI = 1.44-2.23, P < 0.001). Those patients who had preoperative complications such as diabetes mellitus, anemia, hypoalbuminemia and intestinal obstruction were associated with higher risk for anastomotic leakage. The OR was 2.41 (95% CI = 1.78-3.26, P < 0.001), 1.74 (95% CI = 1.12-2.71, P = 0.01), 3.18 (95% CI = 1.63-6.18, P < 0.001), 4.47 (95% CI = 2.69-7.45, P < 0.001), respectively. With regard to the Duke's stage, stage C and D had a higher risk of anastomotic leakage than stage A and B (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.22-2.17, P < 0.001). The distance between lower margin of tumor and anal verge was also a risk factor of anastomotic leakage among patients with ≥7 cm vs < 7 cm (OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.07-8.98, P = 0.04). However, age, the approach of anastomosis and the size and degree of malignancy of tumor were not correlated to anastomotic leakage.

Conclusions

The common risk factors of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal carcinoma in China are gender, preoperative complications such as diabetes, anemia, hypoalbuminemia and intestinal obstruction, Duke's stage, the distance between the lower margin of tumor and anal verge.

Key words: Rectal cancer, Anastomotic leakage, Risk factors, Meta analysis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd