Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06): 410-413. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.06.012

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for different esophageal jejunal anastomosis

Niu Huang1,(), Xin Wang1, Xiongbing Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongcheng County People’s Hospital, Xianning 437400, China
  • Received:2017-07-28 Online:2017-12-01 Published:2017-12-01
  • Contact: Niu Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Niu, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) with different methods of esophageal and jejunal anastomosis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of four hundred and twenty-five patients with TLTG in Tongcheng County People's Hospital of Xianning from October 2011 to July 2016 was performed. The patients were divided into the end to side anastomosis group (Group A), the side anastomosis group (Group B), the triangle anastomosis group (Group C) and the manual suture group (Group D), according to different methods of the anastomosis of the esophagus and jejunum. The clinical data including operation time, time of anastomosis, postoperative eating and complication rate were compared and analyzed.

Results

Preoperative ASA classification divided the 425 patients into 219 of grade Ⅰ, 192 of grade Ⅱ, 14 of grade Ⅲ. There were no significant differences on ASA and the number of lymph node among four groups. No deaths occurred during the perioperative period. The complication rate of Group D was 7.5%, which was lower than 25.3% of Group A, 22.6% of Group B and 11.1% of Group C, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference among the four groups in the length of operation, the time required for the anastomosis and the postoperative feeding. The amount of bleeding, time of exhaust and length of hospital stay in Group D were significantly shorter than those of the other three groups (F=5.744, 4.325, 5.687, P=0.032, 0.025, 0.021).

Conclusions

TLTG has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding and quick recovery after operation. There are advantages and disadvantages in the clinical application of different methods of esophageal and jejunal anastomosis, among which laparoscopic manual suture is relatively safe and feasible.

Key words: Gastrectomy, Laparoscopes, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd