Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05): 373-377. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2015.05.011

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical comparison between dilated papillary sphincter via T tube and via choledochoscope in the treatment of bile duct stones: video attached

Yunfu Sun1,(), Wenxiao Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Weihai 264200, China
  • Received:2015-07-13 Online:2015-10-01 Published:2015-10-01
  • Contact: Yunfu Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Yunfu, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare dilated papillary sphincter via T-tube balloon catheter to extrude stones and calculus removal with choledochoscope.

Methods

Forty-one patients with residual common bile duct stones after common bile duct exploration with T-tube drainage were enrolled in the study from February 2008 to June 2014. Twenty patients were treated with balloon dilation of the papilla and the use of an occlusion balloon for clearance of bile duct calculi via T tube, and were allocated to balloon sphincteroplasty group. The other 21 patients, treated with choledochoscope through T tube sinus, were allocated to choledochoscope group. The size of common bile duct, retention time of T tube, the size and number of stones, operation time, clearance rate of bile duct stones, and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared.

Results

The preoperative T tube indwelling time in balloon sphincteroplasty group was significantly shorter than that in choledochoscope group [(24.2±9.7) d vs (65.4±14.6) d, t=16.4, P<0.01]. The size of common bile duct and the diameter of T tube in balloon sphincteroplasty group were significantly shorter than those in choledochoscope group [(13±5) mm vs (19±7) mm, t=3.144, P<0.01; (5.3±0.7) mm vs (7.2±0.9) mm, t=7.152, P<0.01]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clearance rate of bile duct calculi, overall postoperative morbidity rate, postoperative WBC count, C-reactive protein concentration, stone recurrence rate and bile duct stricture rate throughout the follow-up period after complete clearance of bile duct.

Conclusions

Common bile duct stone clearance by dilation of the papilla and evacuation of the residual stones with an occlusion balloon via T tube is as safe and effective as stone extraction with choledochoscope through T tube sinus. The technique can shorten T tube retention time and is still available to slim common bile duct and T tube.

Key words: Residual stone, Papillary balloon dilation, Interventional procedures, Stone extraction, Choledochoscope

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-87331056 E-mail: pwwxcma2007@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd