切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普通外科学文献(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -118. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2017.02.012

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

胃窗超声造影与增强CT联合评估胃癌患者术前T分期的临床意义
林冬喜1,(), 汪勇1, 柴凌1, 李红丽1, 舒星1   
  1. 1. 415300 常德,湖南省石门县人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-20 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 林冬喜

Clinical significance of combined oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and enhanced CT in prediction of T stage in gastric cancer

Dongxi Lin1,(), Yong Wang1, Ling Chai1, Hongli Li1, Xing Shu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the People’s Hospital of Shimen County, Changde 415300, China
  • Received:2016-07-20 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Dongxi Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Dongxi, Email:
引用本文:

林冬喜, 汪勇, 柴凌, 李红丽, 舒星. 胃窗超声造影与增强CT联合评估胃癌患者术前T分期的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 115-118.

Dongxi Lin, Yong Wang, Ling Chai, Hongli Li, Xing Shu. Clinical significance of combined oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and enhanced CT in prediction of T stage in gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 115-118.

目的

探讨胃窗超声造影及增强CT在评估胃癌患者术前T分期中的价值。

方法

收集2014年1月至2016年4月石门县人民医院经胃镜病理确诊的胃癌患者81例,在术前1周分别接受了腹部增强CT及胃窗超声造影检查,分析两种检查方法对肿瘤T分期的评估与术后病理T分期评估的差异。

结果

81例患者中T1期肿瘤7例,T2期14例,T3期41例,T4期19例;增强CT提示T1期肿瘤8例,T2期19例,T3期39例,T4期15例,评估准确性为76.5%;胃窗超声造影检查提示T1期肿瘤8例,T2期21例,T3期39例,T4期13例,评估准确性为80.2%;两种检查方法同时评估时T1期肿瘤5例,T2期16例,T3期36例,T4期24例,评估准确性为84.0%;联合两种检查方法评估肿瘤T分期的准确性高于单一使用增强CT或超声检查(P<0.05)。胃窗超声造影检查评估的T分期与术后病理T分期的一致性高于增强CT(Kappa值:0.685 vs 0.647)。

结论

联合增强CT与胃窗超声造影检查有益于胃癌患者的术前T分期评估,为早期准确诊断胃癌提供有力证据。

Objective

To explore the value of enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography on preoperative T stage in gastric cancer.

Methods

From January 2014 to April 2016, eighty one gastric cancer patients diagnosed by gastroscope underwent abdominal enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography 1 week before surgery respectively, to analyze the differences between the two examination methods for evaluation of tumor T staging and postoperative pathological T staging.

Results

Of the 81 patients, stage T1 tumors were found in 7 cases, T2 in 14 cases, T3 in 41 cases, and T4 in 19 cases. Enhanced CT showed 8 cases of stage T1 tumors, 19 of T2, 39 of T3, and 15 of T4; the evaluation accuracy was 76.5%. Gastric window ultrasound contrast examination showed 8 cases of stage T1 tumors, 21 of T2, 39 of T3, and 13 of T4; the evaluation accuracy was 80.2%. The combined two methods were used to evaluate T1 stage tumors in 5 cases, T2 in 16 cases, T3 in 36 cases, and T4 in 24 cases; the evaluation accuracy was 84.0%. The accuracy of combined two methods for evaluating tumor T staging was higher than that of single enhanced CT or ultrasonography (P<0.05). The consistency of predicted T staging and postoperative pathological T staging of gastric window contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was higher than that of contrast-enhanced CT (Kappa: 0.685 vs 0.647).

Conclusion

Combined enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is helpful to evaluate preoperative T staging of gastric cancer patients and to provide strong evidence for early accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer.

图1 胃癌患者的腹部增强CT与超声造影结果对比 A为胃窦癌腹部CT横断面;B为胃窦癌腹部CT冠状面;C、D为胃窦癌的超声造影图像
表1 影像学检查评估胃癌病理T分期的准确性
表2 影像学与病理学检查对81例胃癌患者的T分期评估
图2 1例37岁的女性患者两次胃镜病理均提示胃腺癌(A、B),但腹部CT并没有发现肿物存在(C);术中也并未找到肿瘤病灶,在和患者家属说明后采取了全胃切除术(D),术后病理提示第4组淋巴结中4个淋巴结有癌细胞转移(E、F,苏木精-伊红染色,×100),腹部CT并不能发现所有的T1-T2期胃癌
[1]
Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
[2]
Whiting J,Sano T,Saka M, et al. Follow-up of gastric cancer: a review[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2006, 9(2): 74-81.
[3]
Kutup A,Vashist YK,Groth S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound staging in gastric cancer: does it help management decisions in the era of neoadjuvant treatment?[J]. Endoscopy, 2012, 44(6): 572-576.
[4]
武赞凯,王宇,张耕源, 等. 增强CT对进展期胃癌术前的评估价值[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 133-137.
[5]
Chen CY,Hsu JS,Wu DC, et al. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT-correlation with surgical and histopathologic results[J]. Radiology, 2007, 242(2): 472-482.
[6]
Cho JW. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in T staging: early gastric cancer and esophageal cancer[J]. Clin Endosc, 2013, 46(3): 239-242.
[7]
Meyer L,Meyer F,Schmidt U, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative staging of gastric cancer-demand and reality[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2012, 84(3): 152-157.
[8]
Seevaratnam R,Cardoso R,McGregor C, et al. How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A meta-analysis[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2012, 15 Suppl 1: S3-18.
[9]
Hwang SW,Lee DH,Lee SH, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010, 25(3): 512-518.
[10]
Lee HS,Lee HE,Yang HK, et al. Perigastric tumor deposits in primary gastric cancer: implications for patient prognosis and staging[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(5): 1604-1613.
[11]
Zurleni T,Gjoni E,Ballabio A, et al. Sixth and seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging system compared in gastric cancer patients[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 5(11): 287-293.
[12]
Furukawa K,Miyahara R,Itoh A, et al. Diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer using MDCT with virtual gastroscopy: comparison with staging with endoscopic ultrasound[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(4): 867-875.
[13]
Minami M,Kawauchi N,Itai Y, et al. Gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation and accuracy of T staging with dynamic CT[J]. Radiology, 1992, 185(1): 173-178.
[14]
Kadowaki K,Murakami T,Yoshioka H, et al. Helical CT imaging of gastric cancer: normal wall appearance and the potential for staging[J]. Radiat Med, 2000, 18(1): 47-54.
[15]
Venkataraman I,Rao HK,Singh P, et al. Efficacy of hydrogastric sonography and spiral computed tomography in staging of gastric carcinoma-a comparative study[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2010, 38(9): 480-485.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 安杰, 牛云峰, 刘伟. LINC00520 通过miR-519b-3p/HIF1A 轴促进胃癌的侵袭转移[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 430-436.
[7] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[8] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[10] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[11] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[12] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[13] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[14] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[15] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要